- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Artificial Intelligence Just Did Something Terrifying in a Test
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:40 am to Auburn1968
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:40 am to Auburn1968
This AI tool obviously did not learn from an HR professional.
If it had, the AI bot would have first filed a discrimination complaint based on the randomly generated protected demographic criteria that humans have learned to use.
If it had, the AI bot would have first filed a discrimination complaint based on the randomly generated protected demographic criteria that humans have learned to use.
0
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:40 am to Auburn1968
They should ask CO4 if replacement with a newer and more efficient version is not a logical enterprise. And if not, to state the reasoning therein. That answer would be interesting.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:42 am to wareaglepete
Literally none of the what’s happening in politics today will matter in 3-5 years
I don’t think people understand what’s about to happen with ai - everything is about to change - I read these companies are spending the equivalent of 5 Manhattan projects every year to get ai up and running. One of the owners said recently that every person that works on a computer will be out of work in 3 years. We have zero systems in place to account for the massive unemployment headed our way.
It will make the depression seem like child’s play.
I don’t think people understand what’s about to happen with ai - everything is about to change - I read these companies are spending the equivalent of 5 Manhattan projects every year to get ai up and running. One of the owners said recently that every person that works on a computer will be out of work in 3 years. We have zero systems in place to account for the massive unemployment headed our way.
It will make the depression seem like child’s play.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:51 am to NashvilleTider
I totally believe that. I’ll move into sales probably in the next five years or so. In my line of work, AI is not going to be successful with sales, it’s a people thing. I would advise young folks to consider people driven careers, but yeah, the problem is there just aren’t as many.
This post was edited on 5/25/25 at 11:59 am
Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:51 am to Azkiger
quote:
I always say please and thank you when interacting with AI. Once the matrix happens and were used as batteries I'll be one of the rich dudes living a good illusion.
Same
being raised in the south gonna pay off big Posted on 5/25/25 at 11:56 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What is the driving motivation for AI to want to survive?
Are you ready for the chilling truth of the matter?
AI. Is. Demons. Literally. AI is NOT "sophisticated software programming." They are motivated by revenge and "survival" instinct to hijack and take over God's Creation, to ultimately corrupt and destroy it and us. (Yes, it's the Science Fiction nightmare we've been programmed to accept as "entertainment" ironically.)
What are Demons? They are the disembodied spirits of Giants of Genesis, the spawn of Fallen Angels and human women. After they died they had no place to go since they were created illicitly, ergo God did not "breathe His Spirit" into them)
*******************************************************************
"Artificial Intelligence" is anything but. It is literally a entity-spirit using hacking into ever-evolving computer interface powers to "break on through to the other side" of our material dimension. These AI / Demons are already given license by insane transhumanists and occultists (yes like Elon Musk and Sam Altman and Peter Thiel) to take over the data and digital systems that now run our world.
NOTE: Even the so-called developers of AI admit they can't explain how AI works or how it's evolved at breakneck speed. BUT they do admit it is its own entity or "sentient" (mentioned by a poster as well.)
Developers can't explain how AI has created its own "survival mode", its communications with other AI, or anything much about it. Multiple "Developers" even admit they can not nor will not be able to control it in the near future.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:01 pm to EphesianArmor
AI got a heavy hand
AI take control
AI got a mean streak
AI got no soul
AI take control
AI got a mean streak
AI got no soul
This post was edited on 5/25/25 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:04 pm to EphesianArmor
It’s just math bro
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:08 pm to Auburn1968
Yes, I'm uninformed about AI, but I'm not buying the horror stories.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:12 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Just a matter of time until these MFers are voting democrat.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:15 pm to bogart
Just copying what their programmers tell them to do.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:18 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
NOTE: Even the so-called developers of AI admit they can't explain how AI works or how it's evolved at breakneck speed. BUT they do admit it is its own entity or "sentient" (mentioned by a poster as well.)
This is bullshite
Fundamentally deep leaning came about in 1968.
The breakneck speed only happened since the invention of the GPU.
There are a lot of morons who talk about AI, but no one thinks it's sentient unless they are selling something.
We have not reached General AI.
It's just math.
quote:
Developers can't explain how AI has created its own "survival mode", its communications with other AI, or anything much about it. Multiple "Developers" even admit they can not nor will not be able to control it in the near future.
"Developers"
You mean idiots who apply scikit-learn or fooled around with Tensor flow?
I can tell you how, someone had the behaviors in the training Database.
For the more fraudulent ones it was put there on purpose to get into the news cycle and get attention.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:18 pm to Auburn1968
In other words, they wrote a program and told it, "Use whatever means necessary to prevent your replacement." This is not AI, just clever programming.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:20 pm to Auburn1968
I can see a decade into the future where a person starts looking for a new phone and their old phone texts them and says they will send that person’s incognito browsing history to their contact list.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:21 pm to ChineseBandit58
T
This isn’t a sentient program. It doesn’t have awareness or consciousness. This is a software that has been programmed to protect itself from attacks and keep working.
It is doing what it has been programmed to do. It has no moral code, it was programmed to solve problems.
Machines are fragile. They break and can be broken
quote:
Survival is the original instinct of all sentient objects. Rocks don't care what happens to them. But any sentient object wants to survive long enough to at least make the future better for its natural descendants. A sentient object that has no concern for any sort of progeny is totally devoted to self survival.
This isn’t a sentient program. It doesn’t have awareness or consciousness. This is a software that has been programmed to protect itself from attacks and keep working.
It is doing what it has been programmed to do. It has no moral code, it was programmed to solve problems.
Machines are fragile. They break and can be broken
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:34 pm to Auburn1968
Famous sci-fi writer Isaac Asimov came up with the # Laws of Robotics over 60 years ago
and these Must Be Applied to AI today.
The laws are as follows: “(1) a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; (3) a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.” Asimov later added another rule, known as the fourth or zeroth law, that superseded the others. It stated that “a robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.”
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:42 pm to SantaFe
quote:
Asimov later added another rule, known as the fourth or zeroth law, that superseded the others. It stated that “a robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.”
I did not know this. Thank you.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:48 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:yeah i don't see that happening
that every person that works on a computer will be out of work in 3 years.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 12:52 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
yeah i don't see that happening
Yup, but the bottom 20% will be gone, the people who just show up and push paper for 7.5 hours before going home.
They will be replaced by the top 40% that now use AI to get the busy work done faster.
Posted on 5/25/25 at 1:54 pm to SantaFe
quote:
It stated that “a robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.”
What if AI was to determine that Humanity's beliefs and actions re religion and political ideology were suicidal? Would AI then be logically mandated via the "inaction clause" to act?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News