- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Are the FBI lovers still married to their respective spouses?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:55 pm
I can’t seem to find that info on the net.
I feel sorry for them.
I feel sorry for them.
5
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:56 pm to Rebel
We still have no proof that they are actually "lovers" and that the whole affair situation wasn't concocted to make their conversations seem more casual.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:57 pm to Rebel
I guarantee Sztrok wasn’t using a carrot to make her lips move.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:57 pm to Rebel
Peter got as much of that horse faced chic's P as I did.
Tens of thousands of texts and NOT ONE of her telling him she wanted to ride him like a wore out tricycle or him telling her he wanted to wear her like a bowtie.
Bull
fricking
shite
Tens of thousands of texts and NOT ONE of her telling him she wanted to ride him like a wore out tricycle or him telling her he wanted to wear her like a bowtie.
Bull
fricking
shite
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:04 pm to bamarep
Hmmm. So they aren’t really paramours?
I’m a little disappointed.
I’m a little disappointed.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:06 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
We still have no proof that they are actually "lovers" and that the whole affair situation wasn't concocted to make their conversations seem more casual.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:10 pm to Rebel
quote:
Are the FBI lovers still married to their respective spouses?
They probably are. They are Globalist, when they say they are for open borders, they mean on everything.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:12 pm to bamarep
quote:
Peter got as much of that horse faced chic's P as I did.
Tens of thousands of texts and NOT ONE of her telling him she wanted to ride him like a wore out tricycle or him telling her he wanted to wear her like a bowtie.
Maybe they had the good sense to not use their work phones/accounts for stuff like that?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:14 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:Given everything else we have learned, this seems entirely unlikely.
Maybe they had the good sense
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:16 pm to coolpapaboze
quote:
Given everything else we have learned, this seems entirely unlikely.
I don't disagree, but I could certainly see a scenario where they were completely fine talking about politics, etc., simply because of the bubble they were in, but then decided that they should not use work resources to discuss their illicit love lives.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:25 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
We still have no proof that they are actually "lovers" and that the whole affair situation wasn't concocted to make their conversations seem more casua
This came out from the OIG. Who at times actually appear honest.
If they say they were in a relationship, they are probably in possession of peen pics.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 2:28 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Maybe they had the good sense to not use their work phones/accounts for stuff like that?
But it was OK to use them to plot sedition.
I don’t think they were lovers either. That was a ploy to make people feel creepy.
They used work phones because they thought it could be controlled. Since they were sure HRC wold win.
This post was edited on 7/11/18 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:04 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But it was OK to use them to plot sedition.
I am not going to defend their texts but it wasn't fricking sedition.
now, trump getting aide from russia to flip the election. Yeah, that is sedition.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:06 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
I am not going to defend their texts but it wasn't fricking sedition.
now, trump getting aide from russia to flip the election. Yeah, that is sedition.
Stahp.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:07 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But it was OK to use them to plot sedition.
Not that I did not state or even imply this. I am merely speculating about their thought processes.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:07 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
trump getting aide from russia to flip the election
How? Tell us how?
I want to know so I can be informed so I can be sure to vote against him in the next election.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:08 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
now, trump getting aide from russia to flip the election. Yeah, that is sedition.
Keep hope alive.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:12 pm to Rebel
How did they have time to fool around? They were planning Sedition every waking hour of the day.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 3:15 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
now, trump getting aide from russia to flip the election. Yeah, that is sedition.
Even if that DID happen, no it wouldn't be sedition.
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
US Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §?1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §?330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
As you can PLAINLY see Strozk and Paige DID conspire to overturn the lawful election of a President IE sedition.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News