- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are Boomers to blame for the current state of the country?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:13 pm to DrrTiger
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:13 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
Will they still be blaming boomers for their problems in 20-30 years?
Idiots will still be blaming Boomers for all of their problems long after the last Boomer is pushing up daisies.
And no, I am not a Boomer.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:15 pm to The Scofflaw
Liberals are to blame regardless of the generation
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:17 pm to AUCom96
quote:
Why blame a generation? We sold our industrial capacity to make a very few wealthy and give us cheaper shite. We all got distracted and paid more attention to what celebrities were doing or betting on kids games. We checked out of our kid's education and worried more about if they thought we were cool parents or not. We gave in to hedonism, stopped having respect for others and teaching respect to our children. We sneered at age and created virtual shrines to ourselves and then basked in our narcissism.
I wish I had more than a single up vote to give this post!
Can I get an AMEN!
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:18 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
out of touch with modern financial realities.
Out of touch how? Both my parents have passed, but they were born in 29 and 31. Neither of them graduated high school. My mother worked in sewing, on production and never made more than 4-5 an hour at best. Hard work hunched over a sewing machine. My dad did odd jobs and tried to farm. 50-100 acres with a Massey Ferguson 175 and a 2 planter/plow (6-7 foot a pass) is a lot of trips across that field. Corn was likely $2 a bushel (if that) and he might have gotten 90 bushels an acre. Assuming 90 bushels he got $180 an acre. Subtract seed corn, fertilizer, fuel, lime, land rent and he might have made 80 to 90 dollars an acre. 100 acres and if lucky he made 9000 for the year. Likely ended up getting paid 50 cents an hour. They bought a house and 20 acres in the early 70's when interest was high. Far from being a mansion, but it was better than a tent.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:19 pm to LRB1967
quote:Spot on
Liberals are to blame regardless of the generation
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:22 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Another poster hit on this earlier in the thread.
It's not that boomers took advantage of opportunities they were given, good on em.quote:.
It's the "we had good fortune on our side but frick you, work harder" and yanking the ladder up behind them that turns people off
Yeah, a legit gripe. Those Boomers are wrong and self-deluded of course.
And then yet there are those Boomers are far more reasonable and compassionate even to the degree of helping still support and raise their Gen X grand children. Because the Boomers are still the most vast demo, they were bound to have their share of saints but also greedy and selfish bastards who sabotage the rungs of the ladder to remain on top.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:22 pm to The Scofflaw
Ask em again about their attitude towards wealth redistribution when they are as old as the Boomers are now.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:23 pm to jizzle6609
It's an interesting note, and a few points on that line of discussion -
- I've long thought the elimination of the starter/garden home in many metro areas was a big loss for younger generations. I'm in Atlanta, and this just doesn't really exist. Where it did, or arguably does, it's mostly hood.
- I feel like my parents (I'm a millennial but identify as Gen X...) had the option of apartments, postwar/corporate housing (I don't know what to call this, but small-ish, good location communities of very cookie cutter homes often seen in the 40s and 50s), or burgeoning suburbs that weren't nearly as far out as "new" suburbs now.
- In Atlanta, decent area apartments/condos are expensive. The cheaply built 90s garden home communities either don't exist, are in the hood, or are now 500k. The "cheaper" suburbs might be 75 minutes outside of where you need to work and aren't that cheap.
- Now, I do think an undercurrent to all of this is lifestyle/safety expectations. We are (I say we, but I really mean people 10-15 years younger) more risk adverse on this stuff, and perhaps too much so. Maybe these people should be living in College Park or wherever and doing that trade off (and some do). But that wasn't really a "thing" for Boomers.
- Lower-middle class, or comfortable working class, was a thing then. I just don't think it really is now in any practical sense. Many boomers lived through a period where a working class guy could raise a family of four in a modest SFH in a place where you could send your kids to school in a very modest area without significant safety/behavioral/etc. concerns and where they'd get a reasonably decent education because of the nature of the community around them. I just don't think that exists, and it's a major disconnect.
- I've long thought the elimination of the starter/garden home in many metro areas was a big loss for younger generations. I'm in Atlanta, and this just doesn't really exist. Where it did, or arguably does, it's mostly hood.
- I feel like my parents (I'm a millennial but identify as Gen X...) had the option of apartments, postwar/corporate housing (I don't know what to call this, but small-ish, good location communities of very cookie cutter homes often seen in the 40s and 50s), or burgeoning suburbs that weren't nearly as far out as "new" suburbs now.
- In Atlanta, decent area apartments/condos are expensive. The cheaply built 90s garden home communities either don't exist, are in the hood, or are now 500k. The "cheaper" suburbs might be 75 minutes outside of where you need to work and aren't that cheap.
- Now, I do think an undercurrent to all of this is lifestyle/safety expectations. We are (I say we, but I really mean people 10-15 years younger) more risk adverse on this stuff, and perhaps too much so. Maybe these people should be living in College Park or wherever and doing that trade off (and some do). But that wasn't really a "thing" for Boomers.
- Lower-middle class, or comfortable working class, was a thing then. I just don't think it really is now in any practical sense. Many boomers lived through a period where a working class guy could raise a family of four in a modest SFH in a place where you could send your kids to school in a very modest area without significant safety/behavioral/etc. concerns and where they'd get a reasonably decent education because of the nature of the community around them. I just don't think that exists, and it's a major disconnect.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:25 pm to The Scofflaw
It's my money, my pension, my assets. I earned it. No one gave me anything. If I want to piss it all away, well sorry 30 Somethings. Not really, gfy.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:30 pm to The Scofflaw
quote:
Are Boomers to blame for the current state of the country?
The blame is more tribal than generational. I'll leave it at that I don't want to get banned.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:39 pm to The Scofflaw
I'm an aspiring entrepreneur. I, with 2 partners, own and operate 2 fast-casual restaurants and a food truck. Our annual revenue in 2025 will be roughly 2.5 million. We did this more or less on our own, starting as a pop-up and working our way up to leasing brick and mortars. I'm also a full-time W2 engineer because that's what it takes to make it today.
If I wanted to buy either of the properties we currently lease, with standard money down, the mortgage would be nearly double our rent and nearly eat any liquid margin leftover in exchange for "equity".
So we continue on, saving cash to hopefully buy a property one day. I am proud and grateful for that opportunity. My only frustration is that I've done basically everything I can to do it the right way, but the reward is 10x the cost it was for the person I'm leasing from. They are boomers.
Maybe it's not their fault but somewhere along the way triple net NNN leases became standard for commercial properties. This means I maintain the property, pay the property tax and insurance for the right to use the property for material gain.
So my frustration may be misplaced, but when a generation buys property for pennies on the dollar, leases it and abandons all responsibility for the property, it is really hard to catch up. It would be nice if they lowered rent to expedite our savings so we could be property owners someday, or if they leased to own. In my experience so far it's just a cash cow for them and there's no help in sight. I won't quit though.
If I wanted to buy either of the properties we currently lease, with standard money down, the mortgage would be nearly double our rent and nearly eat any liquid margin leftover in exchange for "equity".
So we continue on, saving cash to hopefully buy a property one day. I am proud and grateful for that opportunity. My only frustration is that I've done basically everything I can to do it the right way, but the reward is 10x the cost it was for the person I'm leasing from. They are boomers.
Maybe it's not their fault but somewhere along the way triple net NNN leases became standard for commercial properties. This means I maintain the property, pay the property tax and insurance for the right to use the property for material gain.
So my frustration may be misplaced, but when a generation buys property for pennies on the dollar, leases it and abandons all responsibility for the property, it is really hard to catch up. It would be nice if they lowered rent to expedite our savings so we could be property owners someday, or if they leased to own. In my experience so far it's just a cash cow for them and there's no help in sight. I won't quit though.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:43 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:I hear things like this alot. Assuming you purchased a house in the early 70's and today it's value is 100+ times what you gave for it. What would your asking price be? Original price plus 20% or would it be the maximum amount you could get for it. If it is the latter, why would you fault the evil "boomers" for doing the same?
greedy and selfish bastards
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:51 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I feel like my parents (I'm a millennial but identify as Gen X...
We must be long lost cousins.
I feel the same way
.
quote:
- Lower-middle class, or comfortable working class, was a thing then. I just don't think it really is now in any practical sense. Many boomers lived through a period where a working class guy could raise a family of four in a modest SFH in a place where you could send your kids to school in a very modest area without significant safety/behavioral/etc. concerns and where they'd get a reasonably decent education because of the nature of the community around them. I just don't think that exists, and it's a major disconnect.
This is a big one.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:52 pm to The Scofflaw
LEFTISTS dumbass
and others going along with it to get paid
and others going along with it to get paid
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:52 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
- Entitlement is only part of the issue when bootstrap culture is limited by the fact that you can't realistically go create familial wealth by opening up a barber shop or working really hard at the mill for 50 years, etc. The routes to bootstrap success exist, but they're narrower and will most often require something other than mere grit. Now, I do think hard work and grit can lead to a fulfilling and relatively secure life even now, but I think the "top end" of that has come down.
- A regular guy can start a plumbing business that is very successful and gets bought by a PE company for life-changing money. But there are things that weren't there in the 60s - high saturation, broader reach of small-mid businesses, etc. that mean fewer people can realistically pursue those paths, at least to high end success.
Sure, there are pathways that don't exist now that existed then, but there are pathways that exist now that didn't exist then.
Namely, anything that has to do with the internet. Online stores, online services like transcription or insurance billing that used to have to be done onsite but can be done remotely now, social media advertising businesses, all of which can get big enough to generate generational wealth and can be started and launched for a fraction of what Grandaddy had to risk to start a brick and mortar business back in the day.
And yeah, there's saturation in any of those markets, but there are still people succeeding in them. I would argue that there are just as many succeeding in them as there used to be succeeding in the business opportunities that used to exist, but specifically because the barriers to entry are so much lower, there are more people trying.
There's no doubt that there aren't as many pathways to success doing completely physical menial work (working at the mill fro 50 years, as you say) as there used to be due to technological advances and the fact that we outsource so much of that now, but stuff naturally changes.
You can probably find one or two guys doing old fashioned blacksmithing within a day's drive of you, for example, but you probably won't find many more than that because the demand for that service is almost completely gone.
But growing up in the 70s I never heard anybody blaming the generation of people who were born around 1900 or so (basically people my grandparent's age) for ruining the demand for blacksmiths like people are obsessed with blaming Boomers for everything they don't like about 2025.
It's become insufferable and tiresome.
One thing that people obsessed with complaining about this sort of stuff never acknowledge is that when you compare people buying a house in 1980 with people buying a house in 2025, for example, you aren't comparing the same thing.
Houses were 40% smaller then. And the appointments (countertops, backsplashes, knobs, faucets, etc.) then were cheap crap compared to standard appointments now. Standard now would have been considered custom luxury then.
Someone driving a Honda Accord now with 200,000 miles on it is driving a more reliable vehicle with fewer performance problems and maintenance issues and just as much life left on it as someone driving a brand new Chevy sedan in 1975.
The pinnacle of home entertainment back then was having one of those t.v.s that was built into a large wooden cabinet and what was considered then to be a nice stereo system. You may or may not have cable.
Now people have multiple t.v.s with larger screens, much better definition, can stream anything they want on demand—at home or anywhere they want on their wireless phone, which everyone has. I have a bluetooth speaker system that is about twice the size of a stick of butter that sounds better than the stereo we had growing up, and I can instantly play just about anything I can think of through it off my phone for $10 a month.
I have a tankless water heater that supplies an unlimited amount of hot water. Growing up we used to have to shower in shifts because after the second or third shower you had to wait to give the water heater time to heat up again.
Basically what I am trying to say is that everything that contributes to quality of life is better now than it was then. Even someone who can't yet afford to buy a house in 2025 is living better than someone we would have thought of as being upper middle class back then.
But that never gets factored into any of this. And you know what? If someone is going to blame the Boomers for all the things they don't like, then they also have to give them credit for what they do like.
Everybody responsible for improving all of that technology? Probably Boomers.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:53 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
That point loses its steam when boomers are collectively blaming young people.
The devil is in the details. Blaming boomers for even half the shite it's in vogue to blame them for is like blaming you for the racism of the early last century. It's dumb.
For example in this thread, boomers were blamed for shutting shite down over Covid and were called the "Democrat party" - both are retarded arguments to make given who boomers have voted for, who the younger generations have voted for, and relative voting power.
Blame boomers for Clinton. That's fair. But own Obama and Biden because they were elected by voters younger than boomers.
As for the ridiculous level of national debt, go look at when this debt was racked up and the percentage of the voting public made up by boomers at the time.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:53 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
The democrat party is the party of boomers white MAGA is the youth
uh...you don't actually believe this do you?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:53 pm to Pettifogger
quote:If you can't afford to live in the location you want to live, you need to move or do the work necessary to get a better paying job. I see lot's of people on here who want to complain that they can't have what they want, where they want it and exactly how they want it. I say, welcome to the real world.
Pettifogger
Posted on 4/2/25 at 2:54 pm to The Scofflaw
Too large of a generation that has continued to work longer into older age and not selling their homes for retirement living.
Popular
Back to top


0







