- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AP: memo authorizes ICE to enter homes by force without a judicial warrant
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:21 pm to Riverside
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:21 pm to Riverside
quote:
AP should be embarrassed for posting this act of yellow journalism.
They should also be embarrassed for promoting the elimination of the oxford comma.
0
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:28 pm to Ingeniero
[quote]The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of remova[/quote]
Final order of removal means an immigration judge has already stated the case to stay has failed and they are OKed to be deported. So now they are just avoiding the judges order and ICE has direction to proceed with deportation.
Final order of removal means an immigration judge has already stated the case to stay has failed and they are OKed to be deported. So now they are just avoiding the judges order and ICE has direction to proceed with deportation.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:34 pm to Zahrim
quote:
4t Ammendment shite fascinates me and i spent alot of time learning both sides.
You need to spend more time then.
LE may enter a home with an arrest warrant, but they must only search for the person who is the subject of the warrant and where a person can reasonably be. Nothing beyond that. Evidence in plain view is still on the table, but they need an actual search warrant to search further.
In a 3rd party's home, they generally need a search warrant to enter and search for the subject of the arrest warrant (whose home it is not).
There are exceptions, of course, depending on certain details.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Sorry your candidate lost
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 4th Amendment still applies to ICE
Does it apply to game wardens? Because they can enter without a warrant and no probable cause
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:48 pm to deltaland
Only in "open fields" not someone's house
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:49 pm to JimEverett
quote:
"open fields"
Wrong
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:51 pm to FATBOY TIGER
No, I am not wrong. Absent exigent circumstances a game warden needs a warrant to enter a house, period.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:54 pm to JimEverett
You said "open fields" thats wrong.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
One could argue that we’re at war with the Marxist left, or more accurately, they’re at war with anyone that doesn’t adhere to their destructive ideology.
Their whole objective is to destroy us and eventually the constitution by using illegal immigration as a proxy.
During wars, the constitutional rights of the citizenry have been suspended in the past. There is precedence for this. Hell, Lincoln jailed journalists during the Civil War.
So no, it’s not ideal, but I’d rather have an executive cherry pick certain amendments temporarily to uproot a force that seeks to completely trash the constitution in the future.
Life is often not black and white, but smeared with a lot of gray.
Their whole objective is to destroy us and eventually the constitution by using illegal immigration as a proxy.
During wars, the constitutional rights of the citizenry have been suspended in the past. There is precedence for this. Hell, Lincoln jailed journalists during the Civil War.
So no, it’s not ideal, but I’d rather have an executive cherry pick certain amendments temporarily to uproot a force that seeks to completely trash the constitution in the future.
Life is often not black and white, but smeared with a lot of gray.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:57 pm to FATBOY TIGER
Under 4th amendment law the state can enter private property that is "open fields" it is a well known doctrine. Some states, like my state Tennessee, has greater protection than the federal 4th amendment.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:13 pm to Ingeniero
That's a direct violation of the constitution.
Weird how the only way we can take care of the immigration problem is by violating everyone's rights and suspending the constitution.
Weird how the only way we can take care of the immigration problem is by violating everyone's rights and suspending the constitution.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:15 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
One could argue that we’re at war with the Marxist left,
Not if they want to be taken seriously.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:16 pm to da foozball
quote:
Sorry your candidate lost
I bet you can't name my candidate
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I bet you can't name my candidate
Given your ego, you probably wrote yourself
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:21 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What could possibly go wrong?
Don’t worry cubbies none of the ICE agents want to enter you or your home.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:25 pm to LSUbest
quote:
Good
35 upvotes. I bet 90% are MIGA boomer "conservatives" as well.
MuH voted for him 3 times!
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do better. At least give me a solid rebuttal. I know how much you like to argue.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:32 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Only in "open fields" not someone's house
Bull fricking shite!!
I had fed game wardens check my freezers, the shop and a tractor.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:33 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
Do better. At least give me a solid rebuttal.
Your premise was absurd.
There is no solid rebottle to absurdity.
So my comment remains. A person who wants to be taken serious would never try to make that argument.
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News