- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/5/21 at 12:51 pm to Damone
I think two of the DU founders are posting in this thread.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 12:52 pm to roadGator
Who? Who?
Posted on 5/5/21 at 12:55 pm to Mo Jeaux
What? What?
Posted on 5/5/21 at 12:58 pm to roadGator
Posted on 5/5/21 at 12:59 pm to TBPland
quote:
We know the dictators. Obama and Soros. I believe it’s more Obama
You wouldve never even heard of Obama if he hadnt been a cherry picked puppet because he was a well spoken light skinned black man. you dont come from nothing on your own to be president . Hes a puppet just like Biden and Kamala. Clintons are likely higher up the ladder as they know where all the bodies are buried. Trump was the unpicked president that threatened to bring it all down and thats why both sides turned on him.
Soros, Rothchilds, etc are the ones pulling the strings on both sides.
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:02 pm to TBPland
quote:
We know the dictators. Obama and Soros. I believe it’s more Obama
That damn dictator who... willingly gave up power... to Donald Trump.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:05 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Asking someone to prove a negative.
We can't prove or disprove anything. It isn't being allowed. If you are charged with a crime, and you are innocent, do you run away from proving your innocence? Aren't you eager to present your case of innocence in court? On the flip side, if you are the victim of a crime, and the court refuses to hear your case(s), do you feel wronged?
If this is the most free and fair and secure election in history, then PROVE IT. There is no evidence that supports that. Logic doesn't support it. Reason doesn't support it. 100+ million Americans don't believe it or support it. If it's that divisive of an issue, then prove it. You know, like AZ is doing. Where the audit is yielding hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:07 pm to Mo Jeaux
You are alright. I like using a laser pointer on cats.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:17 pm to BugAC
This is exactly correct. I have been posting the same thoughts on here since January. The parallels are striking, with HR1 basically being the Enabling Act of 1933 -- giving one political party a virtual guarantee of continued national power and reelection. And the party's enforcers are heavily armed forces with color of law and unlimited power to search and seize, with force if necessary. Take a look at what just happened to Giuliani -- a brazen destruction of a political opponent in broad daylight under color of law, with no legitimate premise for the entry and search whatsoever. That's 1930s Germany stuff if I've ever seen it.
Thank God for Joe Manchin for coming out against HR1, but he can't be sleeping too well at night.
Thank God for Joe Manchin for coming out against HR1, but he can't be sleeping too well at night.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:17 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
If you are charged with a crime, and you are innocent, do you run away from proving your innocence? Aren't you eager to present your case of innocence in court?
Man you’re mind is gonna be blown when you get past the 4th amendment.
quote:
On the flip side, if you are the victim of a crime, and the court refuses to hear your case(s), do you feel wronged?
I would probably at least allege the crime in my lawsuit. Not have a bunch of random people try and allege it for me.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:20 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
quote:
The truth is the Nazis rose to power because of the communist agitation in Germany. The country was so close to falling to the communists (with Soviet funding).
===========
The truth is that certain sections of the German right thought the Nazis could take away votes from the "radical left" which included the SPD. I believe it was Schleicher himself that made secret agreements with the Soviets for armament manufacturing, while at the same time he ebbed away at the German democratic state, because he was at heart an authoritarian, being so explicit to tell the German chancellor himself that he expected the government to be anti-parliamentarian.
There was a lot that happened between the German Revolution and the Nazis taking power, and much of it was shaped by Schleicher and other German conservatives, who to be fair, had grown up in authoritarian governance and distrusted democracy. Ascribing all the blame solely to communist agitation isn't necessarily accurate.
I continue to drop in on this thread because of my interest in modern political discourse.
We seem to have gotten into a debate over "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin."
This is probably a good analysis of the minutia involved in behind the scenes motivations of various political establishments a century ago. Devout political/history academics might be very interested in this topic.
It might be well to remember that the obvious problems we have today do not have to mimic any of the detailed maze of political intrigue of the 20's/30's to know how to combat the ultimate effect of what transpired then.
All we need to know is that both Communism and Nazism in its final form were catastrophic results from the unholy seeds of greed and lust for total power.
The best cure for either of these two twin disasters is to adhere to our very own Constitution. It produced the most honorable, benevolent, responsible, productive government in all of history and it is now under attack precisely because it devolves all true power into the hands of the governed.
Only by circumventing the plain text of our constitution can any tyrannical power exist - and thus we have the advent of the modern DEMOCRAT party and the cabal of institutions that serve as its propaganda organs, its enforcement brigades, its funding sources, and its political deflection seditionists. Honest, decent, responsible individuals are shunned, mocked, marginalized, and attacked mercilessly.
A grass roots revolt against these attempts to establish the "true version of communism" that works by employing the tactics of the Nazi party appears to be the only tactic at our disposal.
And whether our analogies to communist and/or Nazi tactics does not have to line up with some DEMOCRAT's elite definitions = angels dancing on a pinhead.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:22 pm to BugAC
quote:I used to wonder... how did good Germans allow that to happen? Now I'm seeing exactly how in real time. Bad times are ahead.
The Democrats are doing exactly this with BLM and ANTIFA.
Good people need to get in front of this. Stand up. Don't accept false premises. Let them call you names--but speak the truth.
Bottom up is the only way this gets fixed.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:24 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:
quote:
We know the dictators. Obama and Soros. I believe it’s more Obama
You wouldve never even heard of Obama if he hadnt been a cherry picked puppet because he was a well spoken light skinned black man. you dont come from nothing on your own to be president . Hes a puppet just like Biden and Kamala. Clintons are likely higher up the ladder as they know where all the bodies are buried. Trump was the unpicked president that threatened to bring it all down and thats why both sides turned on him.
well said
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:26 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Man you’re mind is gonna be blown when you get past the 4th amendment.
So you are talking about the right to plead the fifth?
Great. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Let's set the court date so the evidence can be presented. Let's make it nationally televised in the Supreme Court. I mean, we televised the murder of a criminal, the trial of a criminal for killing that criminal, the horse-drawn carriage funeral of the criminal. Let's set the nationally televised date for the Supreme Court to hear the evidence for the world to see!
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:29 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:
The real goal is to get an unelected Kamala harris into the WH because she will do the globalist bidding and set her up to run again, where she would have no chance without being an incumbent.
true dat - but they have to hope Biden lasts until after the next mid-term. Kamala has to be there to break any tie in the Senate until then. They'd have kicked Biden to the curb already if not for that. He is an embarrassment to them - and that is his greatest accomplishment - bringing shame to people who have been shameless all their lives.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:41 pm to BugAC
quote:
NAZI
Hail Hydra...
I have not made this place weird/creepy in a while
That said...
I am just now coming across this (it even creeps me out). Given what we know now, ponder data manipulation and predictive programming
Important to keep in mind that the show I am going to reference aired March 4, 2001. Youtube oddly even has a little ministry of truth banner on this "fictional" spin off show from the X Files...
Very weird stuff
https://screenrant.com/xfiles-lone-gunmen-spinoff-canceled-quickly-why/
quote:
Why The X-Files' Lone Gunmen Spinoff Was Canceled So Quickly
Despite being one of the most popular shows on TV, The X-Files was unsuccessful in launching a spinoff, with The Lone Gunmen being canceled quickly.
BY MICHAEL KENNEDY
PUBLISHED JUN 19, 2020
quote:
Despite being one of the most popular shows on TV, The X-Files was unsuccessful in launching a spinoff, with The Lone Gunmen being canceled quickly. For those not watching during The X-Files' original run on FOX, it's easy to underestimate just how big a hit it was at the time. The X-Files was a pop culture phenomenon, and one of the defining TV shows of the 1990s. When a property is that popular, it's only natural that those behind it might want to expand the franchise
quote:
The Lone Gunmen aired its premiere episode on March 4, 2001. The episode rather infamously seemed to predict the attacks of 9/11, with a story concerning a hijacked commercial plane being targeted at the World Trade Center. The Lone Gunmen pilot drew a quite good 13.2 million viewers, a number which - in a sign of just how much TV viewership levels have changed since 2001 - would probably get a new scripted series instantly renewed for the next five seasons today. The Lone Gunmen spinoff also drew mostly positive reviews from critics, and looked like a long-term hit in the making.
quote:
The problem was, while audience interest started high, it quickly plummeted. By the very next episode, viewership had dropped down to 8.2 million, dropping a staggering 38 percent in one week. By episode three, viewership was at only 5.4 million, dropping an additional 34 percent after an already large drop the week before. While the numbers ticked back up a couple times, they quickly fell back down again. By The Lone Gunmen's season 1 finale, aired on June 1, 2001, only 3.6 million tuned in, representing a devastating 73 percent drop from premiere to finale. At that point, canceling The Lone Gunmen was basically a no-brainer for FOX. Byers, Frohike and Langly would later return to The X-Files, only to be killed off, which almost felt like a punishment for failure.
Data manipulation?
Links to the episode:
https://realitydecoded.blog/2020/01/05/lone-gunmen-tv-show-predicts-911/
quote:
The Lone Gunmen TV Show Predicted 911 But Also Stated That The US Was Starting Wars For Political Gain And Money From Weapon Sales
byLANDER7JANUARY 5, 2020( 9 )
The Lone Gunmen are a trio of fictional characters, Richard “Ringo” Langly, Melvin Frohike and John Fitzgerald Byers, who appeared in recurring roles on the American television series The X-Files, and who starred in the short-lived spin-off, The Lone Gunmen
The first episode aired on March 4, 2001
The eerie scenes of “The Lone Gunmen” – first shown in the US on March 4, 2001 – were witnessed by TV viewers across the world. Down Under Aussie viewers watched the dramatic scenes of the Boeing 727 passenger plane hurtling towards the World Trade Center just 13 days before 9/11 as it was broadcast in Australia for the first time. To them, this was an even stranger event due to how fresh it was in their minds.
Plot – Computer hacker takes control of a Boeing 727 passenger plane and flies it towards the World Trade Center with the specific intention of crashing the plane into one of the Twin Towers.
All the work of a powerful, rogue group within the government whose plan was to put the blame for the World Trade Center attacks on one or more foreign dictators so they can then bomb and overthrow them.
NOTE: The primetime media was massively absent and reluctance to address the storyline of Pilot and its parallels to 9/11. This unto itself is strange.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTzZtxUcncg
quote:
9/11 March 04 2001 episode The Lone Gunmen
Hail Hydra
You / we live in a very controlled construct...
Posted on 5/5/21 at 1:53 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
So you are talking about the right to plead the fifth?
Great. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Let's set the court date so the evidence can be presented. Let's make it nationally televised in the Supreme Court. I mean, we televised the murder of a criminal, the trial of a criminal for killing that criminal, the horse-drawn carriage funeral of the criminal. Let's set the nationally televised date for the Supreme Court to hear the evidence for the world to see!
You asked wouldn’t I he Eager to prove my innocence. The answer is no if the prosecution is falling flat on its face.
Ask Trump why he didn’t allege it in court.
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:11 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
You asked wouldn’t I he Eager to prove my innocence. The answer is no if the prosecution is falling flat on its face.
Ask Trump why he didn’t allege it in court.
When did the prosecution fall on its face? When did they go to court?
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:27 pm to ChineseBandit58
This is accurate, but my bet is that the bait and switch happens when and IF (hopefully not) Biden wins reelection in 2024. Kamala can't win a national election, and they know it, so they have to use the medical school cadaver to try to win again, and if he does, then as I predict we get the "switch" and they throw away the "bait." Sometime in February or March 2025 Joe and Jill will be sent packing so fast it will make your head spin.
But the question is why. Why is getting Kamala installed so important? It's not because of her intellect or ideas; she's an empty pantsuit who rose to power by sleeping with powerful men, and her background is in prosecution for Pete's sake. It's symbolic, it's because she represents the pagan racial theology of the democrat party: diversity. The billionaire globalists, who worship at the alter of diversity, control the democrat party, and it doesn't matter to them who is in the Oval Office as long as the party wins the election, but they would prefer someone who physically embodies the theology. Hence the nomination of the milquetoast "moderate" Joe Biden (recall how Zuck and others like him torpedoed Bernie) who had the broadest possible appeal even though he was objectively a terrible candidate. Old (in this case REALLY OLD) white guys are not what the globalists want in power, but they know Joe has to be used as the bait to pull off the switch to get the preferred physical embodiment of the party figurehead installed.
The NSGWP was also centrally based on a pagan racial theology that was used to cull just enough of a national majority to obtain and keep power, but specifically excluded certain segments of the population that were eventually destroyed in an unimaginable atrocity. These kinds of autocratic political regimes based on pagan racial theologies do not end well. Absolute power in the hands of a tightly controlled political party is a bad thing, and HR1 is the democrat party's gateway to that kind of power.
But the question is why. Why is getting Kamala installed so important? It's not because of her intellect or ideas; she's an empty pantsuit who rose to power by sleeping with powerful men, and her background is in prosecution for Pete's sake. It's symbolic, it's because she represents the pagan racial theology of the democrat party: diversity. The billionaire globalists, who worship at the alter of diversity, control the democrat party, and it doesn't matter to them who is in the Oval Office as long as the party wins the election, but they would prefer someone who physically embodies the theology. Hence the nomination of the milquetoast "moderate" Joe Biden (recall how Zuck and others like him torpedoed Bernie) who had the broadest possible appeal even though he was objectively a terrible candidate. Old (in this case REALLY OLD) white guys are not what the globalists want in power, but they know Joe has to be used as the bait to pull off the switch to get the preferred physical embodiment of the party figurehead installed.
The NSGWP was also centrally based on a pagan racial theology that was used to cull just enough of a national majority to obtain and keep power, but specifically excluded certain segments of the population that were eventually destroyed in an unimaginable atrocity. These kinds of autocratic political regimes based on pagan racial theologies do not end well. Absolute power in the hands of a tightly controlled political party is a bad thing, and HR1 is the democrat party's gateway to that kind of power.
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 3:04 pm
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News