- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Any Dems on here want to explain why they want to keep S American gang members in the US
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:41 pm
Biden and Harris cried all election cycle that laws needed to pass to beef up the border and deport people. Then it was Trumps fault these laws didn’t pass (complete bs btw) and now their judges are fighting like crazy to keep gang members here. The worst of the worst.
Trump cutting through the red tape by dusting off an 18th century law to actually get things done. And not just spread lies and bs about how they are helpless to do anything. But when he follows through, Dems try their best to block it. So my question is why? Any Dems on here care to answer? Is this what you wanted when you voted for Harris?
Trump cutting through the red tape by dusting off an 18th century law to actually get things done. And not just spread lies and bs about how they are helpless to do anything. But when he follows through, Dems try their best to block it. So my question is why? Any Dems on here care to answer? Is this what you wanted when you voted for Harris?
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:43 pm to Townedrunkard
A. We want carnage in our streets and gangs provide that.
B. Donald Trump is president and we don't like him. Therefore, we want gangs to turn back around even if out of our airspace and jurisdiction. We don't have kids so we don't care how bad things get as long as you don't mess with my starbucks and Tesla (oh shite, I have to get an Ionic5 now). We also kill kids in the womb and hate our own race. We love trannies, even though we love Palestine. Now here's the rub: Pallies toss trannies off buildings. That's going to be tough, but the enemy of my enemy is my friend and we just want Drumpf gone. We can decide later on who we like better. Additionally, we don't like saving other peoples' money. It's theirs, but it's really ours. We want your money spent on things you don't want......either way, we want the gangs back here.
-progs
B. Donald Trump is president and we don't like him. Therefore, we want gangs to turn back around even if out of our airspace and jurisdiction. We don't have kids so we don't care how bad things get as long as you don't mess with my starbucks and Tesla (oh shite, I have to get an Ionic5 now). We also kill kids in the womb and hate our own race. We love trannies, even though we love Palestine. Now here's the rub: Pallies toss trannies off buildings. That's going to be tough, but the enemy of my enemy is my friend and we just want Drumpf gone. We can decide later on who we like better. Additionally, we don't like saving other peoples' money. It's theirs, but it's really ours. We want your money spent on things you don't want......either way, we want the gangs back here.
-progs
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:45 pm to Townedrunkard
My theory: the only halfway competent people within the Democratic machine were only in it for the USAID money. Without that, the party is left solely in the hands of radical dumbasses.
In the past, radical dumbasses were used as foot soldiers to reinforce carefully crafted narratives, but without smart people making those narratives, there’s nobody steering the ship.
It’s a political fleet-in-being.
In the past, radical dumbasses were used as foot soldiers to reinforce carefully crafted narratives, but without smart people making those narratives, there’s nobody steering the ship.
It’s a political fleet-in-being.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:46 pm to Townedrunkard
Not about the commies wanting to keep gang members from being rounded up, it’s about the commies fighting EVERY, SINGLE THING Trump does.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:46 pm to Townedrunkard
This might be the first thread SFP never talks...
Posted on 3/16/25 at 1:50 pm to Kashmir
quote:
EVERY, SINGLE THING Trump does.
This is exactly it. The ONLY thing I could see for a possible, albeit a far fetched one, would be a question of if they’ve had a fair trial and, “they’re going to be coming after US next.”
Which is absolutely a talking point on DU. As if those self righteous and self important people matter to anyone at all

Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:02 pm to HoopsAurora
quote:
This might be the first thread SFP never talks...
Hes busy calling and offering to be a public defender.
Even though he's jot really a lawyer
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:04 pm to HoopsAurora
quote:
This might be the first thread SFP never talks...
Oh he’ll show up with a comment but nothing of substance regarding the direction of the OP.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:04 pm to ChatGPT of LA
I'm not a leftist nor a dim but the answer is to undermine Trump. The left doesn't care at all about the constitution, right or wrong or the ethical or morally correct position, they only care about power.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:05 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Dems try their best to block it. So my question is why? And Dems on here care to answer? Is this what you wanted when you voted for Harris?
Well, I will try. I can sometimes think better about things than they can.
If I was crazy, I might say...
The dems blocked it because everyone is presumed innocent in this country. Did they have a trial? How do we know they were all hang member?
Oh, because someone said so? To be guilty of a crime, they need to be judge and found guilty of this felony kinda like trump was when he was convicted of over thirty felonies.
I'm sure you remember it. Because democrats never said he was guilty before he was found guilty and we didn't say he was a convicted felon till he was.
What the doj did here was deport people they thought were hand members. They may have had proof even but seriously, do you trust the doj? I mean this is not bidens doj, the one that zealously made sure all all laws were followed.
The current doj feels like they might call you a gang member and deport you because they don't like you.
Talk about weaponization of the justice system. They are now prosecutor, judge, juror and executioner all in one. One stop shop.
He arrested, prosecuted, and deported them in one way step.
Man if they did that, it would be peak Democrat.
I took one small thing and then you have to do with blame the Republicans for things they were doing like shop l weaponizing the justice system.
I'm sure I'm going to get down voted but I'm just trying to guess how they would do it. I don't feel this way.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:15 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
Oh, because someone said so? To be guilty of a crime, they need to be judge and found guilty of this felony kinda like trump was when he was convicted of over thirty felonies.
For one, if they can’t prove they are a citizen, then they should be deported. That’s what will happen to me if I’m in another country illegally.
I’m guessing they are able to identify them as gang members by certain tattoos. That’s how they identify them in other countries.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:25 pm to thetempleowl
That's a good guess and summary. I am a Trump supporter and for deporting everyone who is here illegally.
I am against the US locking up anyone for life without a trial. How long will we be paying El Salvador to incarcerate these people?
I realize I'm old school in that we are a nation of laws not persons. I wouldn't have a problem with making a law that to enter the US illegally AND be a member of designated gangs subject to ANY penalty. But, until such a law exists, a life sentence for violating immigration laws is excessive.
I am against the US locking up anyone for life without a trial. How long will we be paying El Salvador to incarcerate these people?
I realize I'm old school in that we are a nation of laws not persons. I wouldn't have a problem with making a law that to enter the US illegally AND be a member of designated gangs subject to ANY penalty. But, until such a law exists, a life sentence for violating immigration laws is excessive.
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:28 pm to Townedrunkard
A Democrat would say - white people are more violent, commit more crimes, and are the biggest threat to the country.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:29 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Any Dems on here want to explain why they want to keep S American gang members in the US
And if they avoid your question, they should at least be honest enough to give Trump credit for deporting them back to their native country. Where, obtw, they aren't wanted there, either.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:29 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
I’m guessing they are able to identify them as gang members by certain tattoos.
You're probably right. I would like to see at least SOME explanation of how they identify gang members.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:31 pm to Townedrunkard
Hank will be along shortly to explain the constitutional issues that we are too dumb to understand
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:33 pm to Townedrunkard
They want to tear down this country and reform it into their Utopia that never works. Easiest way to start is not having a border and create a crisis. It really is that simple. Dems are run by community activist.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I would like to see at least SOME explanation of how they identify gang members.
I think that was the point of showing that first dude’s back tat in the “promo” video.
Problem is that reformed members have those tats too. Like Machete.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:57 pm to Townedrunkard
More of these type of Dem-free threads por favor. K thx.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 3:36 pm to idlewatcher
They won’t answer these threads but the truth is they want these foot soldiers for two things: replace your vote and create chaos.
Popular
Back to top
