- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anna Paulina switches vote to "NO"
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But those defending her now say she became spinless because of her constituents.
Who cares.
Surprised you do.
1
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A negative outcome should have never been in the cards.
That's easy to say for you because you feel no sympathy for people who had severe negative problems due to the Hurricane.
I assume it's due to some other things that make you you (Autism, mental illness, something else). Most people are capable of feeling sympathy and can understand why she made the public post in the first place. She was truly torn.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:03 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
I'm guessing SFP bleeding
I'm laughing at spineless MAGA types via "populism"
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OK so why did people celebrate?
Because McCarthy sucks.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Jurors who have no principles are just as likely to do the opposite. That's the problem with people who have no principles. The more people who lack principles means more conflict and uncertainty in society. That's not a good thing.
Persuading a jury doesn’t necessarily mean they have no principles. It just means you were doing your job effectively. You know that.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:04 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Who cares.
Having principles matters.
quote:
Surprised you do.
She showed today she'll support bad legislation as the wind blows because she has no principles.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:05 pm to moneyg
quote:
That's easy to say for you because you feel no sympathy for people who had severe negative problems due to the Hurricane.
I lived through Laura in 2020 with a worthless Rep. in Clay Higgins who did literally nothing for Lake Charles. I lived this already.
quote:
Most people are capable of feeling sympathy and can understand why she made the public post in the first place. She was truly torn.
Then she shouldn't have come down publicly until she voted.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:06 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Because McCarthy sucks.
So it was personal for you, too?
Nothing about policy? Nothing about promoting 12 spending bills?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:06 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I am to. But I don't think she's a hero for it.
I said she was a hero for it?
quote:
I wouldn't know.
Afraid to say what you believe?
quote:
What are her values?
This is probably why you don't like her. You don't know.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:07 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Persuading a jury doesn’t necessarily mean they have no principles. It just means you were doing your job effectively. You know that.
Jurors who have no principles are more easily swayed, which creates uncertainty.
The whole point of voire dire is to get rid of the jurors you assess to have principles antithetical to your theme/facts and protect the jurors you assess to have principles that support your theme/facts.
The ones who have no principles are complete wild cards and exponentially increase the uncertainty of the outcome.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This was my first post on the original position.
I wanted her to vote No. I criticized her for her sincere position.
quote:
We love our spending, as long as it's OUR spending!
quote:Cult member will never understand you can be critical of some of a person's actions without being critical of ALL of their actions. To them... you either 'fer em or a'gin em!' It's low value binary thinking.
That means nothing regarding laughing at her spinelessness and hypocrisy, supporting it 2 hours later.
THey are still convinced I'm a Biden lover because I called up out Trump for not being conservative enough. It's fascinating to watch the coping mechanism.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Or, I know this is hard to believe, but she heard from her constituents and listened.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A negative outcome should have never been in the cards.
Your reaction, to a negative outcome that didn’t occur, that ended in a decision to support the good outcome, is absolutely ridiculous man.
Your logic for the reaction is wildly flimsy at best.
She would have had to damage MAGA for your reaction to be valid. It just looks like everything I’ve observed from you, though you deny it, is true.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Jurors who have no principles are more easily swayed, which creates uncertainty. The whole point of voire dire is to get rid of the jurors you assess to have principles antithetical to your theme/facts and protect the jurors you assess to have principles that support your theme/facts. The ones who have no principles are complete wild cards and exponentially increase the uncertainty of the outcome.
Agreed. None of that applies to Paulina, though. Simply being persuaded is not indicative of having no principles.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:10 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Cult member will never understand you can be critical of some of a person's actions without being critical of ALL of their actions. To them... you either 'fer em or a'gin em!'
It's somewhat similar to their inability to understand the difference in a personal opinion/stance and objective analysis.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm laughing at spineless MAGA types via "populism"
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:10 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Cult member will never understand you can be critical of some of a person's actions without being critical of ALL of their actions. To them... you either 'fer em or a'gin em!'
Is that why you label them all "cult members"?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:11 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Drama Queen silliness.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:11 pm to MemphisGuy
SlowFlowOweO is being SlowFlowOweO
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:11 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Cult member will never understand you can be critical of some of a person's actions without being critical of ALL of their actions. To them... you either 'fer em or a'gin em!'
Read this again and realize you are doing exactly what you criticize.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 4:11 pm
Page 9 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News