6
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
An activist judge is at it again, strikes down ICE courthouse arrest policy - NATIONWIDE
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:15 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:15 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just ignore it. What’s the judge gonna frickin do about it?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:36 am to Bwmdx
quote:
Just ignore it. What’s the judge gonna frickin do about it?
Are you sure you want to open that door?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:39 am to boogiewoogie1978
That door was kicked open when sanctuary cities/states refused to hand over illegal immigrants in their local prisons with deportation orders .
Game on. Ignore this fig judge's orders and carry on.
Game on. Ignore this fig judge's orders and carry on.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:41 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
No door left. It was already removed from its hinges by Biden/Obama.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:42 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Thought SCOTUS ruled federal judges can only make rulings within their own district??
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:42 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
That door has already been opened. Trump v CASA
Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated that injunctions must be strictly tailored to provide complete relief only to the specific plaintiffs with standing before the court. The majority found that universal injunctions exceed traditional equitable powers granted by Congress because they are "conspicuously non-existent for most of the nation's history" and lack roots in early English Chancery practice.
***EDIT*** Let me be clear on this, the judge's ruling against ICE enforcement is against the law so ignoring it is to follow the law.
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 8:42 am
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Didn't the Supreme Court say that district courts couldn't do this? I think they did. 
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Arrest the judge.
The courthouse is LITERAL federal property.
The courthouse is LITERAL federal property.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 7:58 am to Bwmdx
quote:
Just ignore it. What’s the judge gonna frickin do about it?
Drives me crazy how Trump has listened to obviously unconstitutional judgements. I get it at first to show the people but now it’s beyond ridiculous. People would support him more to ignore the blatant ones
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:12 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
Judges have been ignoring higher Orders for years now. Have you been under a rock?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:14 am to boogiewoogie1978
Absolutely. Can tear it down without ripping it open
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:16 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Democrat Judges have been ignoring higher Orders for years now. Have you been under a rock?
FIFY
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:16 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
That door has been opened previously. Thank you, Andrew Jackson.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:28 am to BFIV
If ICE complies with this order.....wont they be in violation of the supreme court ruling?
And this nonsense about a judge is appointed for life and nothing can be done, we just arrested one for harboring an illegal.
If they violate a supreme court ruling arrest them.
The supreme court with their wishy washy interpretations are causing this mess. They are akin to the NCAA.
And this nonsense about a judge is appointed for life and nothing can be done, we just arrested one for harboring an illegal.
If they violate a supreme court ruling arrest them.
The supreme court with their wishy washy interpretations are causing this mess. They are akin to the NCAA.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:30 am to medium_okra
quote:
That door was kicked open when sanctuary cities/states refused to hand over illegal immigrants in their local prisons with deportation orders .
Game on. Ignore this fig judge's orders and carry on.
It's quite ironic that the discussion is leading in the direction that it's going. The article posted lists a group named "The Door" as one of the litigators.
quote:
The lawsuit was brought by African Communities Together and The Door, two organizations that provide services to immigrants
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:37 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
You're a dumb frick
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:38 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Are you sure you want to open that door?
Door was already open.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 8:39 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Not
For
Long
For
Long
Posted on 10/5/26 at 9:09 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This distinction between federal agencies. I don't see any of these activist judges ruling that the FBI cannot arrest at a courthouse.
But yes, this judge is outside the scope of his authority with this ruling. Supreme court has ruled they cannot do this on a national scale.
If it was in a red state, I'd want the state AG to move for disciplinary actions on this judge.
But... NY. We all know NY polis love their illegals.
But yes, this judge is outside the scope of his authority with this ruling. Supreme court has ruled they cannot do this on a national scale.
If it was in a red state, I'd want the state AG to move for disciplinary actions on this judge.
But... NY. We all know NY polis love their illegals.
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 9:10 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News