- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amy Coney Barrett = Trump’s biggest mistake
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:20 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:20 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Their job is to objectively interpret the law. Determining what’s in the “best interest of the country” is nowhere in their job description. How old are you?
Old enough to know that the platitudes we learned in schoolhouse rock, civics, and political science are BS. The way you beat leftists is to fight fire with fire.
1
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:27 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Amy Coney Barrett = Trump’s biggest mistake
I agree. It was a total mistake appointing someone who can read the constitution. Should have appointed Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:28 pm to TBoy
quote:Or another Weezy from the hood.
I agree. It was a total mistake appointing someone who can read the constitution. Should have appointed Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What if this comes down 7-2 or worse?
It won’t be worse. But based on oral arguments, 7-2 would be my guess.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:41 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:Hell no.
BTW, judges are supposed to act in the best interest of the citizenry
Posted on 4/4/26 at 7:44 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
BTW, judges are supposed to act in the best interest of the citizenry
Agreed, brother. Really wish these people would understand that the Constitution is much more malleable in 2026, than 1776. Sitting around and working a field isn’t the same as the Internet age.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:09 pm to Taxing Authority
I’d argue objectively interpreting the constitution is acting in the best interest of the country every time.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:12 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Agreed, brother. Really wish these people would understand that the Constitution is much more malleable in 2026, than 1776. Sitting around and working a field isn’t the same as the Internet age.
The constitution was made malleable with Marbury vs. Madison. And I guarantee you, the Reconstruction amendments were not intended to allow third world human debris to game the system. SCOTUS has the ability to slam the door on this bullshite ……if they want to.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:19 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Amy Coney Barrett
My fellow Dominican alumnus
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:19 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Old enough to know that the platitudes we learned in schoolhouse rock, civics, and political science are BS. The way you beat leftists is to fight fire with fire.
Ok, Billy Bad arse
If you aren’t a fan of our Constitution and laws, no one is forcing you to stay. I guarantee none of us will miss you.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can defend and support my arguments
Not being philosophically consistent with other positions you've taken, though.
Such as Article 1, Section 4.
This post was edited on 4/4/26 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 4/4/26 at 8:24 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
BTW, judges are supposed to act in the best interest of the citizenry.
No, that's not the SCOTUS' mandate.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:29 pm to burger bearcat
Definitely a mistake, probably not his biggest.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:30 pm to ELVIS U
...and he fought really hard for the a%%hole.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:31 pm to Champagne
quote:
Trump has a weakness for women like Bondi and Barrett. He sees their physical attractiveness then over-estimates their actual value
Which would make any rational person conclude that he sucks at making decisions. It's completely moronic.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 9:34 pm to Powerman
I don't agree with you often, but you're spot on in this instance.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:42 pm to Champagne
quote:
physical attractiveness
Wtf?
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What if this comes down 7-2 or worse?
Then we have 7 dumbass on the SCOTUS.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 10:49 pm to burger bearcat
She is straight LIBERAL. Disgusted with her stances.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 11:20 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
No, that's not the SCOTUS' mandate.
That’s the mandate of EVERY judge and justice, you bunch of fricking twits. Every hear of the concept of “public policy”? Good grief you Romney types are insufferable.
PS: My condolences to all you leftist punkasses on the second strike eagle crewman getting extracted. We all know you people were hoping for the worst.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News