- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alina Habba ERUPTS after verdict against Trump "Judge edited my questions and his answers"
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:50 am to POTUS2024
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:50 am to POTUS2024
quote:
remember some discussions from people like Napolitano, prior to these cases getting started. They talked about how difficult Trump makes things for his attorneys. They talked about how there is or could be difficulty for Trump, finding the best representation as a result, and some other things. He interviewed Tacopina, iirc. Trump does a lot of damage to himself.
We are all allowed representation in this country.
Btw, I would never vote for you.
2
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:53 am to dgnx6
quote:
Btw, I would never vote for you.
He said he was going to be as popular as Orange by the end of this year
Hes TDS rage posting is intensifying
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:58 am to BCreed1
These judges need repercussions for their actions. Only thing that will stop this corruption.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:10 am to ksayetiger
quote:
quote:
Sexism benefits women
Well, if you are cute.
If you are ugly...
You get $83.3 million dollar judgments out of thin air.
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 8:58 am
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:36 am to Obtuse1
This is SOP for Trump in trials and it ends up fricking him real good. He took what could have been a manageable verdict ( he was always going to lose given the current atmosphere) and turned it into a spectacle. Either Habba is incompetent or her client hamstrung her . Probably a combination of both.
The fact that Tacopina withdrew as his lawyer is telling. Joe Tacopina is not afraid of shite, but when he takes you on he tells you exactly what he expects and if you do what he tells you, he will either get you off or limit the damage.
The fact that Tacopina withdrew as his lawyer is telling. Joe Tacopina is not afraid of shite, but when he takes you on he tells you exactly what he expects and if you do what he tells you, he will either get you off or limit the damage.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:40 am to KiwiHead
OH BS!
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:42 am to Obtuse1
quote:
Obtuse1
MAGA is not going to be happy with your post.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:45 am to Obtuse1
quote:
relitigate the first case.
The appeals court will take care of that. The motions in limine that were granted were outrageous.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:47 am to geauxbrown
quote:
MAGA is not going to be happy with your post.
His post is not incorrect, but he is doing exactly what he accuses Habba of doing. Lying by omission. This limiting of questions is just a continuation of ruling against trump every chance and hamstringing any opportunity for a fair hearing. This will be overturned on appeal. It was a disgusting display and even those of you that hate trump should be against this weaponization of the justice system.
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 8:48 am
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:47 am to BCreed1
I'm sure there's a way to overturn this but they know it will cost lots of money on Trump's behalf and consume lots of his time in doing so. They clearly are trying to bog him down so he can't spend valuable time in swing states as much as he wants.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:49 am to BCreed1
If you read up on what Habba was trying to do, either she or her client wanted a different set of rules than what is allowed for everyone else in this situation. The fact that she tried to do it, either shows balls or incompetence. An incompetent attorney with balls makes you look stupid....hope Trump isn't paying her.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:49 am to KiwiHead
quote:
The fact that Tacopina withdrew as his lawyer is telling
I did not know this. That's a BAD sign.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:51 am to KiwiHead
quote:
If you read up on what Habba was trying to do, either she or her client wanted a different set of rules than what is allowed for everyone else in this situation. The fact that she tried to do it, either shows balls or incompetence.
I think it's more balls. They know the press on this is more valuable for the Trump-politician brand, so they ensure it becomes the story within their political support universe.
Although Trump storming out does show more of an emotional strategy and not the hyper-rational meta approach I'm trying to give them credit for, so it may just be incompetence and emotion.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:51 am to SlowFlowPro
Trump is an uncontrollable client, what lawyer who didn’t desperately need the business/exposure would put up with that?
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:55 am to Damone
There is a bit of sad irony that a man who relied on using the civil system and litigation for decades to bully people into submission is facing the same system.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is a bit of sad irony that a man who relied on using the civil system and litigation for decades to bully people into submission is facing the same system.
It's amazing to watch you pretzel yourself into justifying this nonsense. Trump was a litigious arse, but this involved high-level Democratic operatives bankrolling a civil suit because a hostile state legislature changed a law specifically to target one person. That's banana republic stuff.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:59 am to SCLibertarian
Yeah, I see we have a healthy dose of left leaning people here.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:59 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
It's amazing to watch you pretzel yourself into justifying this nonsense.
I didn't "justify" anything.
quote:
but this involved high-level Democratic operatives bankrolling a civil suit
Following the Peter Thiel playbook.
quote:
a hostile state legislature changed a law specifically to target one person.
I already said months ago this was offensive and possibly unconstitutional.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:59 am to BCreed1
quote:
Yeah, I see we have a healthy dose of left leaning people here.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:14 am to BBONDS25
quote:
even those of you that hate trump should be against this weaponization of the justice system.
The biggest tell of all these past 15 years is that the 'progressives' know damn well that should conservatives ever get back substantial power that they would never descend into the tyrannical methodology of the 'progressives' - they know they can bide their time 'unburdened' by any concern over 'retaliation' that was not above board. They know conservatives will fight to protect 'progressives' ' rights' just as much as their own.
We are fighting an evil unknown since the 3rd reich. we are fighting against a soulless enemy who have no capacity for the truth or logic or fairness or sympathy or fair play. Their only rule is b.a.m.n. with the emphasis on the any.
Their only joy comes from 'winning' an unfair contest.
They are a cult based on lies and false promises and hoaxes.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News