- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Acosta Sworn Testimony: DJT's Name Not in Any Epstein COURT Documents
Posted on 10/18/25 at 8:13 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 10/18/25 at 8:13 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
One of the most important points he has made is some of the women changed their stories since a victims' fund became available and a cottage industry started. Their credibility is terrible, they are on the record as saying they pretty much enjoyed their time with Epstein.
Most of those girls were of age. They weren't victims. They were just plain ole hookers.
0
Posted on 10/18/25 at 8:14 am to cajunangelle
I hope I’m right about this…I hope Trump is using the Epstein files in America’s favor.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 8:20 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
She prolly thinks that if the people who raped underage girls were punished, then, going forward, fewer underage girls would be raped, including those she represents
Epstein is dead. Maxwell is in jail. I'm not saying no crimes were committed. Release the client list, by all means. But going after Trump on this is, imo, shooting ammo into the night air.
Makes a lot of noise, but accomplishes little.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 9:08 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Remember in 2016 they hauled out the DC Madam's attorney... and froze the caption on DJT's photo? This is what Trump means by HOAX.
As if Trump was on the DC Madams list...Sound familiar?
As if Trump was on the DC Madams list...Sound familiar?
This post was edited on 10/18/25 at 9:12 am
Posted on 10/18/25 at 9:23 am to cajunangelle
Had forgotten the DC madam Epsteined herself.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 9:35 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Her mom's home was a nice double wide in Florida. Deborah Jeane Palfrey -supposedly hung herself in her mothers shed.
It was Judge Merrick Garland who blocked the DC Madam client list from going public
It was Judge Merrick Garland who blocked the DC Madam client list from going public
This post was edited on 10/18/25 at 9:39 am
Posted on 10/18/25 at 9:36 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
So much of what the left believe just isn’t true.
One of the most relevant posts ever made on this site, and condensed to a single sentence.
The only thing I would add is that I don't think too many of them even care whether or not the nonsense they proclaim is true.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 10:14 am to cajunangelle
I wasn’t paying attention to that story at the time. But a double wide in Florida? Seems a DC Madam could have sent mom a bit more money & put her in a nicer place.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 10:18 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
On May 1, 2008, roughly two weeks following her April 15 conviction, Palfrey was found hanging in a storage shed outside her mother's mobile home in Tarpon Springs, Florida. Police found handwritten suicide notes in the bedroom where she was staying, dated a week before her death.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 10:22 am to cajunangelle
So out of all of her claimed high profile clients, only one was named, a Republican?
Isn’t that interesting.
Isn’t that interesting.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 10:34 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Yeah, maybe someone from Louisiana can explain why Vitter was the only name somehow released? Oppo research? He was the only one with a diaper fetish?
Lawyer who represented the ‘DC Madam’ releases names of 174 groups - including the FBI, IRS and State Department - that 'used escort service between 2000 and 2006', but he still can't reveal the individual clients
Lawyer who represented the ‘DC Madam’ releases names of 174 groups - including the FBI, IRS and State Department - that 'used escort service between 2000 and 2006', but he still can't reveal the individual clients
Posted on 10/18/25 at 12:49 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Acosta Sworn Testimony: DJT's Name Not in Any Epstein COURT Documents
Doesn't matter. The media has already f3d the narrative to their sheep, and these people have accepted it as absolute gospel.
You could bring Epstein back from the Seychelles and have him testify in front of Congress on the world stage that he literally had nothing at all to do with Trump post-1997, and these sheep would still believe the narrative and even deny that a very alive-and-well Epstein had just teasified.
There is no fixing the level of indoctrination we're seeing in these people. This is going to have to be a generational phase-out, where the ideology dies when a particular generation dies. It's similar to how mainstream legacy media is beginning to die as the boomer generation begins to expire.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 3:19 pm to cajunangelle
Fookin hell…
Posted on 10/18/25 at 3:26 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
She prolly thinks that if the people who raped underage girls were punished, then, going forward, fewer underage girls would be raped, including those she represents
Gosh, she must not have friends with friends, and donors. Maybe she doesn’t need friends and friends of friends of donors, or donors. Only applies to Trump.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 4:05 pm to cajunangelle
quote:Seems weird, that democrats would create a hoax, but didn't implicate Trump in it.
DJT's Name Not in Any Epstein COURT Documents
Posted on 10/18/25 at 4:43 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Seems weird, that democrats would create a hoax, but didn't implicate Trump in it.
Which is precisely why some of you became so confused about what Trump was saying. Confused and wrong. It didn’t take a rocket scientist to conclude, very quickly at that, that he was referring to the claim that he was covering up evidence that incriminated himself in the files. That was clearly the narrative that MSM was running with, as well as a gang of folks right here amongst us. That’s what he was stating was/is a hoax.
It takes a extremely simplistic, basic, ignorant “reading” of his words and statements on that to misinterpret it, and I understand that might well be intentional, so as to show Trump in the most unscrupulous light possible. But it just doesn’t work and comes across as rather witless. I’m not saying the declarant is witless, per se, but certainly the look of it in this instance does. And to consciously avoid the obvious intended interpretation over and over again only exacerbates the already bad look.
This post was edited on 10/18/25 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 10/18/25 at 5:23 pm to cajunangelle
There are a lotta pervs in Washington. It’s been that way for a WHILE.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 5:29 pm to davyjones
Maybe I give people too much credit, but I still find it hard to believe these people are as confused and unthinking as they imply with their constant "misunderstanding" of literally everything.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 5:55 pm to GRTiger
There’s a bit of a “learning curve” or “translation key” when it comes to dealing with most people. Folks tend to have their own dialect, colloquialisms, parlance, lingo, jargon or whatever one wants to call it, and it’s just a societal understanding that it’s each of our responsibility to adjust and adapt, for the greater good of proper and effective communication. But mostly for one’s own damn good.
Whoever knowingly chooses to refuse to do so, that’s on them. frick em. They’re only hurting themselves - prudent people will do the obviously correct thing because they aren’t immature nor spiteful for zero legitimate reason, and certainly know not to be intentionally ignorant. Feel me, playa? I know you do, you already indicated the lack of ignorance on this important topic.
Whoever knowingly chooses to refuse to do so, that’s on them. frick em. They’re only hurting themselves - prudent people will do the obviously correct thing because they aren’t immature nor spiteful for zero legitimate reason, and certainly know not to be intentionally ignorant. Feel me, playa? I know you do, you already indicated the lack of ignorance on this important topic.
This post was edited on 10/18/25 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:25 pm to GRTiger
They act stupid in repeated snarky response...Because there is peace in the middle east. So they can no longer hate on Israel/Qatar and mindlessly blame them for everything--Soon no one can c/o Ukraine.
So muh epstein, muh Qatar, is all they got.
The left aren't acting stupid, they are. The others are new and old neverTrumpers acting like geri curl libertarians.
They can't move into the logic lane. Muh epstein.
Remember the bombing of Iran causing WW3? Democrats AND R's repeated this. It is a planted thought to divide MAGA like Swallowswell bragged about.
SFP takes advantage of this and adds contrarian bullshite.
So muh epstein, muh Qatar, is all they got.
The left aren't acting stupid, they are. The others are new and old neverTrumpers acting like geri curl libertarians.
They can't move into the logic lane. Muh epstein.
Remember the bombing of Iran causing WW3? Democrats AND R's repeated this. It is a planted thought to divide MAGA like Swallowswell bragged about.
SFP takes advantage of this and adds contrarian bullshite.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News