- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACB and Kav unbelievable!!!
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:05 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:05 am to cardboardboxer
quote:prove that there wasn't election fraud
fraudsters like Q and Mrs. Kraken
quote:oh I think the pb has caught on to this all too well
accept that elites on all sides don’t give a frick about you
1
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:11 am to AggieHank86
quote:so you figured out that sapience bullcrap you were peddling? You answered my questions about your laughable homosexuality notions?
Almost always correct
Let me know when you are serious about having an intellectual discussion because I've been calling out your garbage for a long time and all you do is run away
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:11 am to TDsngumbo
B.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They are simply not viewing every issue through the lens of “what is best for Trump”
That is totally irrelevant.
Not hearing cases that should determine the legitimacy of the electoral process is totally unacceptable imho.
That leads me to believe the “option A” being correct is as legitimate as the usurper playing the role of president.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:14 am to bfniii
quote:
prove that there wasn't election fraud
And this is why Mrs. Kraken and Lin “everyone is a pedo” Wood got the equivalent of millions of dollars of free publicity for their legal practices and god knows how much in direct donations.
When Trump’s own AG said there wasn’t enough fraud to flip the election it was over, done deal. Fraud investigations MIGHT have happened in a single state if one state decided the outcome but Trump lost by more than a single state. That meant there was literally no chance anyone, even the best lawyers in the country, could change the result because the margin was too big. But instead of believing that obvious truth y’all followed behind some terrible lawyers willing to say what you wanted to hear for a chance at celebrity.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Almost always correct
Almost is the key word cause you have never ever been correct
It is annoying that you think otherwise
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:21 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Either
A - Trump really is guilty of SOMETHING and they’re doing their job, which none of us on this board are qualified enough to understand, in an unbiased way
or
B - there truly is something lurking beneath the surface to completely destroy Trump at all costs and has compromised literally everyone not named Trump
Or
C - They're ruling on the technical merits of the case as they should. Unfortunately that's unilateral disarmament.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:30 am to markinkaty
quote:
Buckley was overrated windbag also: look at what he left us. Neocons and Natl Rev. and Liz Cheney.
Hear! Hear!
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
A. It really is that simple.
At the rate that Democrats leak everything illegally, this would have occurred a long time ago if it was true.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
they are doing there job
Tell us all about how your mother was a fricking English teacher again, asswipe.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
quote: Either A - Trump really is guilty of SOMETHING and they’re doing their job, which none of us on this board are qualified enough to understand, in an unbiased way or
B - there truly is something lurking beneath the surface to completely destroy Trump at all costs and has compromised literally everyone not named Trump
A. It really is that simple.
But seriously, they are doing there job, regardless of whether Trump is “guilty of something.” They are simply not viewing every issue through the lens of “what is best for Trump”
We're all guilty of something....aren't we? The question is whether Trump's financial/tax records increase anything worthy of prosecution or is the SDNY just hoping to find things to embarrass Trump or diminish his popularity with +74 million Americans?
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:43 am to Bass Tiger
quote:Are you asking my personal opinion?
We're all guilty of something....aren't we? The question is whether Trump's financial/tax records increase anything worthy of prosecution or is the SDNY just hoping to find things to embarrass Trump or diminish his popularity with +74 million Americans?
I think it is probably a political prosecution.
I doubt that he is guilty of lying on loan applications or property valuations to any greater extent that most other real estate investors. We will see if the investigation bears this out.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:51 am to AggieHank86
Seriously if trump were guilty of anything team bob would have brought it out 
I think Arizona is the best and only play for trump showing fraud. If fraud is shown than the whole election comes into question even though it’s only 1 state
I think Arizona is the best and only play for trump showing fraud. If fraud is shown than the whole election comes into question even though it’s only 1 state Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:52 am to Catchfalaya
List of SCOTUS cases dismissed (Epoch Times, developing).
1. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) who challenged President Joe Biden’s victory. Kelly had asked SCOTUS to consider his lawsuit which challenged mail-in voting policies in his home state of Pennsylvania.
2. A petition seeking review in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid.
3. Lawyer Lin Wood against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, challenging results and policies in Georgia.
4. Arizona, Ward v. Jackson, was also dismissed. That lawsuit challenged Biden’s victory at the polls in the state.
5. An appeal lodged by Trump against Wisconsin results was denied. The case was Trump v. Biden.
6. Another Wisconsin-related appeal, King v. Whitmer, was dismissed.
https://archive.vn/pLrxu
1. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) who challenged President Joe Biden’s victory. Kelly had asked SCOTUS to consider his lawsuit which challenged mail-in voting policies in his home state of Pennsylvania.
2. A petition seeking review in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid.
3. Lawyer Lin Wood against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, challenging results and policies in Georgia.
4. Arizona, Ward v. Jackson, was also dismissed. That lawsuit challenged Biden’s victory at the polls in the state.
5. An appeal lodged by Trump against Wisconsin results was denied. The case was Trump v. Biden.
6. Another Wisconsin-related appeal, King v. Whitmer, was dismissed.
https://archive.vn/pLrxu
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:54 am to Catchfalaya
ACB and Kav need a spine installed.
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:54 am to nugget
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/4/23 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:55 am to Catchfalaya
They are afraid to take ANY election fraud cases....too much responsibility to tell the truth!
Posted on 2/23/21 at 9:58 am to Catchfalaya
Posted on 2/23/21 at 11:07 am to cardboardboxer
quote:it's astonishing this idea is actually believed by people. Like there weren't photos and videos of election irregularities. Like there weren't hundreds of eyewitnesses to questionable activities. Statistical data showing the improbabilities. Expert analyses explaining obvious problems. No, no, no. Kraken lady was just making up stuff to get some money and a book deal
y’all followed behind some terrible lawyers willing to say what you wanted to hear
This is why America is sunk. There isn't a critical mass of people who can think rationally above a high school level education
Posted on 2/23/21 at 11:12 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:this is why the judicial system completely failed America - thinking there wasn't enough merit in investigating obvious election irregularities. Even with this latest round of scotus comments it's clear they were never going to allow evidence to be heard under any circumstances.
They're ruling on the technical merits of the case as they should
There appear to be 2 exceptions - the wi sc ruling that is still on the books and the Maricopa ruling still being fought by the fraudsters
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News