- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A question about Epstein Island nobody has answered seriously
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:30 am to idlewatcher
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:30 am to idlewatcher
Didn’t Melinda Gates divorce Bill because of Epstein?
I’m sure there were other factors but I believe this was the main one. She knew there was some seriously bad evil shite going on.
I’m sure there were other factors but I believe this was the main one. She knew there was some seriously bad evil shite going on.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:34 am to idlewatcher
I can't imagine that the parents were in the picture very much for most of these girls. The ones featured in the Filthy Rich doc on Netflix said that there was a pattern to the predation. His team would find young girls who were from low income homes, specifically targeting at-risk girls who would swoon at a handful of cash thrown at them.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:35 am to Geekboy
I would ask Jimmy Kimmel this…….
“You vehemently denied Aaron Rodgers subtle claim that you were on the Epstein list. And you proved you were not on it. Why was it so important to you that you prove you were not on that list? You know something we don’t?”
“You vehemently denied Aaron Rodgers subtle claim that you were on the Epstein list. And you proved you were not on it. Why was it so important to you that you prove you were not on that list? You know something we don’t?”
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:38 am to Geekboy
quote:
I know the obvious answer…..pedophilia.
I don't think that's obvious at all. I think there was some of that going on, but it was probably mostly about whores over 18. The pedophilia was probably just for the occasional weirdo.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:38 am to Geekboy
How did Kimmel prove that he wasn't there? Were there dates when it was said he was on LSJI?
Being able to provide an alibi for a specific date/time only holds for that date/time. Those who mentioned that it would be easy for someone to take a different flight into St. Thomas and helicopter or boat over would also be outside of the scope of published flight logs, since those would only be for the Lolita Express itself.
Being able to provide an alibi for a specific date/time only holds for that date/time. Those who mentioned that it would be easy for someone to take a different flight into St. Thomas and helicopter or boat over would also be outside of the scope of published flight logs, since those would only be for the Lolita Express itself.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:39 am to Geekboy
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:40 am to Penrod
quote:
it was probably mostly about whores over 18. The pedophilia was probably just for the occasional weirdo.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:40 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Id imagine, they were destitute, in poverty, addicted to drugs or in rare cases, their kids were just kidnapped and they never saw them again. They were probably all from Central America, Africa, SE Asia and Eastern Europe
I thought he was recruiting local girls in Florida to his house to give "massages" and paying them well. Then those girls would go recruit other girls. Ghislaine then became his primary recruiter. Am I misremembering that? Seems some of the girls were perhaps not entirely obedient to their parents (maybe not bad girls per se) and would go with their friends to Epstein's house.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:41 am to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:
I thought he was recruiting local girls in Florida to his house to give "massages" and paying them well. Then those girls would go recruit other girls. Ghislaine then became his primary recruiter. Am I misremembering that? Seems some of the girls were perhaps not entirely obedient to their parents (maybe not bad girls per se) and would go with their friends to Epstein's house.
This is correct.
There was a similar network in NYC and London.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:46 am to Geekboy
The Lolita Express never landed on Little St James Island - there’s no airport. Visitors flew into St Thomas USVI to avoid customs and choppered over.
Visitors were there to ‘discuss investments”
Visitors were there to ‘discuss investments”
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:46 am to Geekboy
It was really a resort vacation spot for people who were connected.
That was the extent of the “cover story” as far as I know.
That was the extent of the “cover story” as far as I know.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:48 am to VOR
quote:
It was really a resort vacation spot for people who were connected.
That was the extent of the “cover story” as far as I know.
If there is one thing we know the elites enjoy, it's status and mingling around other elites. Epstein, AT THE VERY LEAST, provided that.
That's why some of the fake lists are so funny b/c a lot of those people would not qualify at all
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:59 am to Geekboy
Here my other question I’ve always had. If these were some of the most powerful people in the world flying privately to perform illegal acts….. why would they adhere to flight passenger log regulation?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 9:01 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
Here my other question I’ve always had. If these were some of the most powerful people in the world flying privately to perform illegal acts….. why would they adhere to flight passenger log regulation?
Therein lies the rub.
The elite of the elite, who control our government and the world....still are bitches to FAA manifest regulations?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 10:47 am to Geekboy
It's like they were all instructed to say nothing. As in, it was a trip to a private island, don't give any more info bc once you open your mouth there will be 1000 follow up questions.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 11:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If there is one thing we know the elites enjoy, it's status and mingling around other elites. Epstein, AT THE VERY LEAST, provided that.
I imagine that's the allure. A private place owned by someone who plays at higher power levels than you currently enjoy as a celebrity. This was a chance for your regular celebrity to get pipelined into power and get connected with folks like the Clintons. Money and fame is one thing, power is the real goal.
Most of the celebs are undereducated egomaniacs. Most of them didn't realize that they were walking into a finesse from a what seems to be front for an intelligence agency to gain compromised assets.
You're not going there to diddle underage kids, but they show you a good time, connect you with some politicians, tell you what kind of power you'll have and then introduce you to someone young and attractive. Things might happen, then they kindly inform you of her age and that while you're under the protection of the Epstein umbrella, you'll be all good. You just have a couple of responsibilities to stay in the inner circle of power. First, keep what happened to yourself and second, you have to recruit new people. Now you're owned, but will be part of a powerful group that'll look out for you and promote you to new heights. The more prominent you become, the more of asset you'll be.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:24 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
It's noted that many of the names on the list have a history of questionable behavior
Add Woody Allen marrying his his step-daughter who he helped raise from a young child. Also seven year old Dylan Farrow one the children he and actress Mia coparented claimed that Woody touched her inappropriately.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 3/21/24 at 1:31 pm to Geekboy
Good point
It's so bad, that they don't even try to come up with a cover story.
It's so bad, that they don't even try to come up with a cover story.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News