- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A file was removed this morning from the recent JFK dump.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:13 am to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:13 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
You mean the "smoking gun" Oswald used all by himself to blow Kennedy's head off? So far, nothing I've read disputes that conclusion. The AI summations I've seen posted on this board don't count.
oswald didn't fire a single shot
1
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:14 am to monsterballads
quote:
quote:
You mean the "smoking gun" Oswald used all by himself to blow Kennedy's head off? So far, nothing I've read disputes that conclusion. The AI summations I've seen posted on this board don't count.
oswald didn't fire a single shot
Ok.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:20 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
You mean the "smoking gun" Oswald used all by himself to blow Kennedy's head off?
Ah, so you are a subscriber to the Magic Bullet theory.
We must not question nor hold in doubt, any government sanctioned narrative or conclusion, eh?
Oswald may have been a Marine, but have you ever shot a bolt action rifle that quick and that accurate?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:32 am to FlexDawg
I mean, if any foreign nation that we are conducting diplomatic relations with and that point person is strictly a State Department Official or a CIA official posing as a State Department Official, does it really matter? Even if the point person is a solely a State Department diplomatic official the foreign government has to be smart enough to assume that if this State Department diplomat has information that the CIA will to have the same information.
Nine months ago Sundance over at theconservativetreehouse.com provided a good restaurant metaphor of the relationship between the State Department and CIA (he does it here in context of Ukraine but it could be any nation or conflict):
LINK
Nine months ago Sundance over at theconservativetreehouse.com provided a good restaurant metaphor of the relationship between the State Department and CIA (he does it here in context of Ukraine but it could be any nation or conflict):
quote:
To share an example and provide an accurate elevator speech, CTH assembles non-pretending metaphors. Here’s the State Department and CIA joint silo operation. All of our foreign allies and enemies know and understand this metaphor. I have discussed it with several and many smile in affirmation:
The U.S State Dept and CIA operation is like a restaurant.
The Dept of State is the front of the restaurant, with the Secretary as the Maitre D’.
The CIA is the back of the restaurant, the kitchen. The Director is the Chef.
The menus at the front, as well as the specific seating/tables available, are dependent on the status of each guest. Each table gets a different menu.
The Chef has the opportunity to kill the diner. The diners know this and those who understand the nature of the business model consider the Chef the most powerful person in the establishment.
The consulates are the wait staff. USAID are the food runners. The Dept of Defense are the bus boys.
Ukraine is a big tipper.
LINK
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:37 am to LSUminati
quote:
I think what people fundamentally misunderstand is that there will be no documentation of a conspiracy. There will be a tangled web of information that investigators, journalists, scholars and former CIA/law enforcement will have to synthesize and analyze, likely over years. Only then can any kind of conclusion be drawn, but it will never be proven in a court of law. At least the information will now be available.
Like George Carlin once said (paraphrasing), "It's not a grand conspiracy. It's a convergence of interest."
Lost of people from different groups wanted JFK dead for different reasons.
Same applies to Trump now. It's why Ryan Routh and Thomas Cooks got so close to Trump.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:56 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:And, every other country does the same thing. They all have intelligence officers at embassies posing as something they are not.
Not sure why they would want to keep that secret. Every CIA movie I've ever seen, the agents used State Department cover. This is widely known by everyone.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:02 am to slidingstop
quote:
were they still using typewriters in 1997?
As a 1998 graduate, I did in fact take a typing class in 1997. So you can go to hell
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:07 am to FlexDawg
Whatever is released, it was always going to be claimed it isn’t everything.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:53 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Let's let actual human beings who are experts in their fields review the data and come to a conclusion and not rely so much on computer programs to do that for us.
The experts have never led us astray.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:08 pm to slidingstop
quote:
were they still using typewriters in 1997?
Most likely typed up on a Wang Word Processor. They were still heavily used in .gov land up into Y2K.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:15 pm to FlexDawg
Wait
Does this retard think that it is breaking news that the State Department is cover for CIA abroad?
I'm going to guess that nothing was deleted and this retard is trying to farm engagement from other retards who never read the text.
Does this retard think that it is breaking news that the State Department is cover for CIA abroad?
I'm going to guess that nothing was deleted and this retard is trying to farm engagement from other retards who never read the text.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:53 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Not sure why they would want to keep that secret. Every CIA movie I've ever seen, the agents used State Department cover. This is widely known by everyone.
just to play Devil's advocate here:
maybe it's not just that they work for the State Department, but the documents may have listed very specific positions that would out anyone that was undercover.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:02 pm to Tangineck
We don't need one, it has already been known.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:12 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
Confirms the belief that many files still haven't been released
The story isn't told in the docs published this week. Expecting criminals to admit to criminal behavior is an exercise in futility.
The story is going to be told in docs (should they exist) from OTHER agencies that may fill in some of the conspicuous blanks that the CIA & Warren Commission Report have always had.
There were no fewer than a dozen different entities who would've wanted JFK dead. The bigger questions would surround whether or not those groups had anything to do with it, or simply turned a gleeful blind eye to it when our own country-within-a-country CIA went the wetworks route?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News