- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A few interesting details on the SCOTUS rule from yesterday in scotusblog.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:16 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:16 pm to loogaroo
quote:
That's the point.
The point is that the AEA is an impotent solution to the purported problem?
You sure that's really the point you were trying to make?
1
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are better at getting the dummies on here to chase your irrelevant, masturbatory red herrings. That should answer your question more than sufficiently.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:18 pm to loogaroo
How entitled are they? They come here illegally, don't learn any English, and then complain that the government doesn't communicate with them in Spanish.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:19 pm to GRTiger
quote:
That should answer your question more than sufficiently.
Not even close
Again, I completely understand why you're punting to avoid discussing your hypothetical in detail.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The point is that the AEA is an impotent solution to the purported problem?
You sure that's really the point you were trying to make?
How do we deport a wave of invaders before the system is overwhelmed?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I completely understand
Prove it for once. I imagine you're the only one without doubts about that.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:23 pm to loogaroo
quote:
How do we deport a wave of invaders before the system is overwhelmed?
As I've explained to y'all for years. You have to fund a bunch of judges and courts to process more.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:24 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Prove it for once.
I did, by pointing out the absurdity that we couldn't deport 100M with expansive use of the AEA. When presented with this, you've run and gone the Stephen Miller route.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I've explained to y'all for years. You have to fund a bunch of judges and courts to process more.
What's the point of AEA then?
We are back to the chicken and egg scenario with meeting the criteria.
Trump's team should have argued that first.
SCOTUS punted.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:27 pm to deltaland
quote:
It’s important to understand the details. If I’m reading correctly ScOTUS didn’t rule Trump can’t remove them under the AEA. It sounds like the proper procedure using the AEA is to give clear notice to those the govt intends to remove so they have time to challenge their status as alien enemies. They told the administration they must do this And they also told the lower courts to review these challenges and rule on them in an expedient manner. So in a nutshell they told Trump admin to dot the i’s and cross the t’s and told the judges don’t drag it out forever rule and get on with it.
Like the poster below said, we don’t inform citizens 24 hours before an arrest.
This is again going above and beyond what we get.
The fact these illegals can get a court date, a decision, an appeal and it taken to the SC in such a short amount of time is not how it works for regular folks.
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:28 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Like the poster below said, we don’t inform citizens 24 hours before an arrest.
The arrest is not the comparable stage of a prosecution.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you don't understand. Thanks.
I dont think you've failed to mischaracterize a single argument submitted before you. For years now. It is such an unproductive and tedious shtick to endure, especially with the quantity we get out of you.
I dont think you've failed to mischaracterize a single argument submitted before you. For years now. It is such an unproductive and tedious shtick to endure, especially with the quantity we get out of you.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:29 pm to loogaroo
quote:
What's the point of AEA then?
It's for military purposes.
Hence why it's only been used 3x (IIRC) and all during declared wars.
The illegal immigration problem isn't a military scenario, which is why attempting to use it was always tenuous.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:30 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I dont think you've failed to mischaracterize a single argument submitted before you
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
In short it's illegal to deport illegals.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 1:32 pm to NewbombII
quote:
In short it's illegal to deport illegals.
No. Nobody has argued that.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:22 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:27 pm to Bunk Moreland
What's the point of AEA then? How do we deport invaders when the system gets overloaded? It will be too late.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:29 pm to loogaroo
quote:
What's the point of AEA then?
For military actions.
quote:
How do we deport invaders when the system gets overloaded?
More immigration judges.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:30 pm to loogaroo
Was it previously decided that judges do not have the power to decide who falls under the preview of the alien enemy act.
I thought that was under the discretion of the president.
Did the court just say that they can review every detainee action and they get appeals in court?
Or is that just under the alien enemy act, in which case the act is now worthless?
I thought that was under the discretion of the president.
Did the court just say that they can review every detainee action and they get appeals in court?
Or is that just under the alien enemy act, in which case the act is now worthless?
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News