- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Democrat candidate for President advocated gun confiscation by the Federal government
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:04 pm to Wolf Messing
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:04 pm to Wolf Messing
quote:
Hence the word "Assault" they are the main weapon used in "Assault" against other people.
This is 100% wrong. Completely false. A lie you are now regurgitating. This is a falsity that only the very of simple minds that are incapable of rational thought will retain as fact.
You see why we can’t believe anything a liberal says? They only spout emotion. Not facts.
0
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:30 pm to wickowick
About to happen anyway. About 150,000 illegals invading monthly from as far away as Africa. Walking in with rolls of 100s and suitcases.
Country has been under an all out attack with Nobody doing anything about it.
Want to fix the infrastructure and deal with homeless and poverty - kick out the 31 millions ILLEGAL ALIENS that are scamming US taxpayers.
Country has been under an all out attack with Nobody doing anything about it.
Want to fix the infrastructure and deal with homeless and poverty - kick out the 31 millions ILLEGAL ALIENS that are scamming US taxpayers.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:32 pm to Nguyener
quote:Kinda looks that way if the whackos ban semi-auto, unless they go after revolvers then we are left with flintlocks or bows and arrows.
So we're left with only single action revolvers?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:33 pm to Wolf Messing
quote:
Key word "Assault Weapon" nobody has a reason to own these. Hence the word "Assault" they are the main weapon used in "Assault" against other people.
That's a made up word. Besides, mine are Semi Auto and not Full or 3 Round Burst. It's a civilian weapon not a military weapon.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:35 pm to LSUlefty
quote:
mine are Semi Auto and not Full or 3 Round Burst. It's a civilian weapon not a military weapon.
But what do they look like?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 2:41 pm to weagle99
quote:
They finally aren’t hiding it
This has been a spoken goal of gun-control advocates since the early 1990's, nothing they've been trying to hide.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 4:55 pm to Nguyener
quote:Only an airhead would still parrot that. The Supreme Court has never held that 2nd amendment rights could not be regulated.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You don't know that?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 5:05 pm to texridder
Only an airhead would quote the Bill of Rights?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 5:46 pm to texridder
quote:
Only an airhead would still parrot that. The Supreme Court has never held that 2nd amendment rights could not be regulated.
And only tyrants and idiots think they have the power and Constitutional mandate to “regulate” a right that explicitly says “shall not be infringed.”
I’m not even going to ask if you know this, because you do, same as most of the rest of your socialist democrat buddies. And while you all have pretty much managed to shite on any and every part of the Constitution which inconveniences you, shitting on this particular part will be done at your own peril.
The blood of patriots and tyrants is the natural fertilizer for the tree of Liberty, after all.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:03 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:Only an airhead would quote the bill of rights as a absolute proposition that has never been so interpreted by the Supreme Court.
Only an airhead would quote the Bill of Rights?
In fact, until 2008, the Supreme Court had never recognized the right to bear arms in any case except in the context of serving in the militia.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:06 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Does your dad own a gun ?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:08 pm to bayoudude
...and country girls!
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:12 pm to texridder
quote:
In fact, until 2008, the Supreme Court had never recognized the right to bear arms in any case except in the context of serving in the militia.
You say that as if it holds some meaning toward the court’s interpretation of the 2A, but what it really means is the SC didn’t have to recognize it as such, because it was almost universally recognized that way since it was written. It’s only relatively recently that tyrants and socialist democrats have mounted impassioned campaigns to strip this right from Americans.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:12 pm to troyt37
quote:Only imbeciles (like you)read the 2nd amendment disregarding the language relating to "a well regulated militia".
And only tyrants and idiots think they have the power and Constitutional mandate to “regulate” a right that explicitly says “shall not be infringed.”
In fact, until 2008, when an activist Supreme Court held otherwise, the right to bear arms in this country only extended to the situation where one was serving in the militia.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:15 pm to texridder
quote:
In fact, until 2008, when an activist Supreme Court held otherwise, the right to bear arms in this country only extended to the situation where one was serving in the militia.
Facts, history, and reality say you’re a fricking idiot.
ETA: I guess you miss the part that says: “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE” huh. Calling you an idiot is giving you too much credit. The fact is, you’re corrupt, and unAmerican, just like the socialist democrats you support.
This post was edited on 6/28/19 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:18 pm to troyt37
quote:Since the 2008 Supreme Court case was addressing a law that had been passed in and been enforced since 1975, I'd have to say you are full of crap
You say that as if it holds some meaning toward the court’s interpretation of the 2A, but what it really means is the SC didn’t have to recognize it as such, because it was almost universally recognized that way since it was written.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:20 pm to texridder
quote:
In fact, until 2008, when an activist Supreme Court held otherwise, the right to bear arms in this country only extended to the situation where one was serving in the militia.
Annnd, you don't know what a militia is.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:24 pm to texridder
A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to maintain a healthy body, the right of the people to eat fruits and grains shall not be infringed.
What is the right, and whose right is it?
What is the right, and whose right is it?
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:26 pm to troyt37
quote:
Facts, history, and reality say you’re a fricking idiot.
ETA: I guess you miss the part that says: “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE” huh. Calling you an idiot is giving you too much credit. The fact is, you’re corrupt, and unAmerican, just like the socialist democrats you support.
The fact is that you are an ignorant dumbass.
Until the Supreme Court's ruling in 2008, there had never been recognized a right to bear arms EXCEPT in the circumstance where one was serving in the militia.
If you would have looked that up instead of spending your time making stupid, baseless accusations, you wouldn't have made a fool of yourself.
Posted on 6/28/19 at 6:30 pm to troyt37
quote:Instead of spending your time making up stupid, irrelevant, bogus analogies, why don't you read District of Columbia v. Heller, and get back to me.
A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to maintain a healthy body, the right of the people to eat fruits and grains shall not be infringed.
What is the right, and whose right is it?
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News