Started By
Message

re: 9/11 Documentary. More questions than answers.

Posted on 9/14/21 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 12:53 pm to
How did it free fall in complete symmetry? Did all the columns collapse at once?

A controlled demolition would have looked identical to how all of these buildings fell. I mean these reinforced steel buildings offered no resistance to the structures collapsing above. No explanation has been given for this.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14622 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:


Sure....fell straight down like a controlled demolition and nothing hit it.


Oh you don’t do physics well.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89748 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

"That's when I walked up to the president, who did not see me coming, and whispered into his right ear, 'A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack," said Card.


Then he sat there for 8 mins not scaring the children

It really is surreal
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14622 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

How did it free fall in complete symmetry? Did all the columns collapse at once?


Did you see the Florida condo collapse?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89748 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:00 pm to
Yeah I think the engineering and physics of the collapse has been done to death. The real questions to me are around the actual hijackers and how they got there and did what they did. The buildings collapsing mechanisms are pretty settled in my mind.
Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:01 pm to
Yes I did. The entire building did not collapse at once. Not in free fall as well.
Posted by Roberteaux
mandeville
Member since Sep 2009
6206 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:03 pm to
quote:


A controlled demolition would have looked identical to how all of these buildings fell.


In a demolition, there is a very loud timed sequence of charges that rip up and down the motherfricker, and the thing drops into its footprint...it dosn't spread out 4 blocks and hit every fricking building around it like the twin towers did. None of the WTC buildings that fell were characteristic of a demolitions. I swear 9/11 truthers have the IQ of babies
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37029 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:04 pm to
All the people in charge who weren’t available or had just been placed into their positions and it delayed the chain of command ..

That part at the beginning was very weird. I didn’t know all of that

But I finished that documentary and had such a gross feeling .
Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:08 pm to
I would say for a thousand foot building it was pretty darn close to being on it's own footprint.

I used to think truthers were out of their mind too. If the last year and a half haven't taught you to not trust the government narrative then I'm not sure what will
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14622 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:08 pm to
I know it’s exciting to believe there is something there. But there’s not. Gravity is constant, when something gives towards the bottom, it freefalls (like wtc 7). When something gives at the top, it pancakes (like wtc 1&2).

2 of the biggest buildings in the world collapsed in an uncontrolled manner right next to this building, which cased massive damage and fire that could not be controlled. That is why it collapsed in that manner.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35053 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

4. I agree WTC 7 is the smoking gun. No steel building before or since has ever collapsed due to fire.

Could the concussion of the Towers 1 and 2 collapsing, in addition to its own fire, have combined to cause 7's collapse? I don't mean that rhetorically, genuine curiosity.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20718 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:10 pm to
Here is one question I have...while there are several curiosities that don't add up to me about 9/11, one thing that jumps out at me is...with how freaking incredibly slow the government usually is about almost everything, they seemingly immediately knew who the 19 hijackers were and released that info. They had to know something already so if they did indeed know something already about them, why was this allowed to happen? What we were told to believe was that the hijackers were clever and got through security randomly to pull this off suddenly...that never added up to me.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37029 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

they seemingly immediately knew who the 19 hijackers were and released that info.


This doc also points out how the ONLY footage of any of the hijackers in any of the airports was that of Atta and one other guy in Portland Maine airport.

That’s crazy to me. That they can pinpoint when these people were gonna be in the airports and have combed over it all the security footage inside and never had produced any other visuals of the hijackers
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162184 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Have they found anymore footage of the Pentagon impact or are we still to believe that the only available footage from the most secure military facility in the world is one grainy parking lot camera?
excellent question.
Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:12 pm to
Look I'm no expert. But for a fact no steel building ever collapsed due to fire before or after 9/11. Plus the absolute symmetry and speed by which it fell does nor add up.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35053 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

They had to know something already

quote:

one thing that jumps out at me is...with how freaking incredibly slow the government usually is about almost everything

You may have it answered right there. Plus no "no fly list" or dedicated "terror watch list" of the level designed post-9/11 was in effect at the time.

But ultimately I'm just guessing and really don't know.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109533 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Look I'm no expert. But for a fact no steel building ever collapsed due to fire before or after 9/11. Plus the absolute symmetry and speed by which it fell does nor add up.



Is there a large sample of others that have been hit at near full throttle by large fully fueled commercial jet airliners?
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14622 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

ook I'm no expert. But for a fact no steel building ever collapsed due to fire before or after 9/11. Plus the absolute symmetry and speed by which it fell does nor add up.


No shite you’re not an expert.
2 cross country jets hit buildings full of fuel.
Turns out the towers fire control systems didn’t account for jets hitting it when they were designing it.
Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:15 pm to
So many things don't add up. I had no idea until I watched this. Had seen and read bits a pieces of 9/11 but never something so thorough and fact based.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162184 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

I used to think truthers were out of their mind too. If the last year and a half haven't taught you to not trust the government narrative then I'm not sure what will
The last 50 years, but you are 100% correct that last few years pulled the FBI/CIA/DOD masks right off.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram