
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
8th Circuit US Court of Appeals has reinstated Missouri's new Congressional map
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:16 pm
quote:
BREAKING: The 8th Circuit US Court of Appeals has RE-INSTATED Missouri's new Congressional map, which FLIPS a Democrat seat to Republican — 7R-1D
The court calls Missouri judges' attempts to use the old maps UNCONSTITUTIONAL
JD Vance DIRECTLY called for this just days ago while in Missouri: "When you have courts that say that Missouri is not allowed to draw its districts the way that it would like to, but certain blue states are, what that means is that those courts are saying that the votes of a Missouri Republican or a Missouri Independent count less than a Massachusetts Democrat."
"You could have people who are going in the general election and casting ballots in districts that are different than the ballots that they cast just a couple of months ago in the primary. That, to me, is an affront to the democratic process."
This will likely be appealed again up to the US Supreme Court, but time is running VERY short, so in all likelihood, the new maps are GOOD TO GO.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:20 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:20 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
The new map was used for the primaries, insane they wanted to switch it back for the general.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:21 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
This is a big deal. Good news
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:33 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Can they make up our damned minds???
But yeah. This is a win for us here in MO.
As long as some other asshat judge keeps their nose where it belongs!
But yeah. This is a win for us here in MO.
As long as some other asshat judge keeps their nose where it belongs!
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:42 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The new map was used for the primaries, insane they wanted to switch it back for the general.
Activist judges .
We reds we all for the new map change. But Dems could/should lose a seat (another thing we reds support) and now it's a big fight
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:50 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
With the primaries already completed, how exactly was using the old map going to work?
The original ruling was max level retardation.
The original ruling was max level retardation.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:46 pm to CastleBravo
It is a problem of the MO Republicans, and specifically the SoS, own creation.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:11 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Surprised this thread isn’t getting more traction. It’s very important.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:33 pm to idlewatcher
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:24 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Ballots were mailed out already.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:30 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
Where is SFP now?
Discussing the GTOE
Why would you ask for me in this thread? Have I even commented on the MO map issue?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
insane they wanted to switch it back for the general.
You're surprised at what a politically motivated judge would do? Unfortunately this will get worse and I'm not sure it will ever get better again.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 9:40 pm to SEC. 593
quote:
It is a problem of the MO Republicans, and specifically the SoS, own creation.
They got what they wanted because they were right and they fought for it.
How is that a problem?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 10:27 pm to RohanGonzales
Missouri has a law that says a petition can force a referendum on any passed assembly bills.
Those signatures were submitted to the SoS last year, he then sat on the issue until the day of the primary until, where his reason to deny the petition was on legal grounds and not of sufficiency of signatures grounds.
Those signatures were submitted to the SoS last year, he then sat on the issue until the day of the primary until, where his reason to deny the petition was on legal grounds and not of sufficiency of signatures grounds.

Popular
Back to top
11













