Started By
Message

re: $572 Million Decision Against J&J in Opioid Trial - Why we can't have anything nice

Posted on 8/26/19 at 3:55 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26369 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 3:55 pm to
The issue was their marketing, promotion, and targeting of doctors who pushed their pills more. Appears to have been a "failure to warn" issue.

quote:

District Judge Thad Balkman said “the state met its burden that the defendants Janssen and Johnson & Johnson’s misleading marketing and promotion of opioids created a nuisance as defined by [the law]

The ruling says that J&J and Janssen repeatedly downplayed the risks of addiction to opioids, training sales representatives to tell doctors the risk of addiction was 2.6% or less if the drugs were prescribed by a doctor. Doctors who prescribed a high amount of opioids were targeted as “key customers.”

J&J said it’s going to appeal the decision. The fine was significantly less than the penalties sought by Oklahoma, sending J&J’s stock up by more than 5% in post-market trading after the verdict was read.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

What’s the state doing with the money?


I'm sure it's going to the general fund
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7935 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 3:56 pm to
States like Florida and Ohio already have suits in the pipeline.

It is pure greed by the states to get their money. Did it with tobacco (heck, even the Florida Supreme Court rendered an opinion that smoking CAUSES cancer. That is simply not true but there it is, the law of Florida.)
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

The issue was their marketing, promotion, and targeting of doctors who pushed their pills more. Appears to have been a "failure to warn" issue.


So doctors didn't know pain meds were addictive
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42290 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:01 pm to
IIRC, one man was pretty much deemed to be THE expert on as to whether or not these drugs were highly addictive. Basically, he lied (according to his own admission if I remember correctly). The physicians nationwide started prescribing these drugs based on his testimony (with the added influence of the "pain scale") with a clear conscience. People became addicted, the script ran out, and heroin began to boom again.

The questions I have (if what I wrote is accurate) are why did the guy lie, who convinced him to lie (if it wasn't of his own accord), and how long was big pharma aware of the circumstances while still dumping these drugs ($$$$) into unsuspecting communities?

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162915 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

They go from handing the shite out like candy to begging the dentist for 5 pills after a double root canal. Everything is so fricked up
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26369 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

So doctors didn't know pain meds were addictive



Irrelevant when it comes to who has the primary duty to warn of negative side-effects of a product.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135699 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

and targeting of doctors who pushed their pills more.
You believe in fairytales? Because you just repeated one.

In medical terms this is basic. An opioid is an opioid. Period. Every opioid agonist has addictive properties. Everyone. Every doctor knows that. Every one. Period.

This issue was caused, created, and mandated by the government. It was not created by doctors. It was not caused by J&J.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Irrelevant when it comes to who has the most money


FIFY
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37140 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

The issue was their marketing, promotion, and targeting of doctors who pushed their pills more. Appears to have been a "failure to warn" issue.



So doctors didn't know pain meds were addictive
Actively lying about just how addictive it was, and they knew it, is pretty egregious. Do you think the tobacco companies would have been hit as hard as they were had they not file 13nd the research they had on all of the ill effects of tobacco smoke?
Posted by Vood
Member since Dec 2007
8550 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:06 pm to
I am sure this is far from over and the appeal has already been filed.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135699 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Irrelevant
No it's not irrelevant. This was not some hidden carcinogenic element, or covered up side effect. Every doctor prescribing J&J opioids knew EXACTLY what the addictive risks were. Every one. No exceptions.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18505 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Seems the docs overprescribing the shite are the problem. Not the companies manufacturing the drugs for legitimate patients.


I agreed with this and I still place a tremendous amount of blame there - I mean, the docs continued to prescribe it once they knew the effects.....

But back to my point - J&J knew the side effects and highly addictive nature, and intentionally covered it up.

The result is a ton of addicts - many who died.
This post was edited on 8/26/19 at 4:08 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:07 pm to
The biggest contributor to the opioid addiction???

Medicaid and Medicare.

They should immediately stop reimbursements for prescriptions outside the hospital for opioids or something like that.

What did they do for pain before opioids?

No state Attorney General is going to admit their medicaid system failed to stopped the pain doctors.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37140 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

I am sure this is far from over and the appeal has already been filed.


There are 2000 cases pending.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:10 pm to
Just wondering.... what kills more people, alcohol or opioids? Which substance has more addicts?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162915 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:10 pm to
Back in 2010 I was on pain meds for a surgery and took them and got off of them as quickly as I could. What no one told me was the digestive issues they cause afterwards. I was making an appt for a specialist thinking I was dying or somehing. Then a Duke Univ surgeon told me the opioids caused the awful bowel movement related symptoms. The only thing that helped was pro-biotics that I researched and took way before they were in every drug store..

Nowadays it is commonly known but it seems doctors were not informing.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Nowadays it is commonly known


Hell, they've got a pill for it now.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135699 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Actively lying about just how addictive it was
Every opioid agonist is addictive. That is as basic a premise as there is in medicine.

"Actively lying about just how addictive it was" is as stupid a premise as saying the gunmaker lied to the gun retailer that a 22 pistol was not dangerous.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133660 posts
Posted on 8/26/19 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

$572 million
JNJ made a net profit of $15.3 BILLION in 2018.

After taxes (if lawsuit awards are deductible as a business expense) the bottom line impact will be in the range of $350 million, +/-.

JNJ stock is UP $3.05/share in after hours trading, or about +2.5%.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram