Started By
Message

re: 3rd quarter GDP second estimate bumped up from 3.0% to 3.3%

Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41866 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:07 pm to
You seem to be ignoring anything pre Clinton.

So if you look at the "average post Clinton, and even at that 2% is below average, right?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41866 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:09 pm to
Like I said, we have two projections, one from the CBO who of late hasn't been that accurate, and one from Trump which is unproven but we all know is self serving.

I hope Trump is right, you?
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:11 pm to
slightly off-topic but i just went look back at the data in the 50's-70's to see what was normal in those years, and noted that there was a two-year "recession" in the 60's where GDP growth was a positive 2.6% in both years.



look at that. you'd commonly see years of 5, 7, 8%

and then a quick pop down to just under 0 but not often worse than -1% during recessions

in the 90's & later, no years of 5%. and the expansions (white background) seem to step down after each recession
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68474 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Recovery from what?

The awesomeness of the previous 8 yrs

Sarcasm OFF
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

You seem to be ignoring anything pre Clinton.

So if you look at the "average post Clinton, and even at that 2% is below average, right?



Actually after 99-2000, i got a 1.8% average. 1.95 if clinton's last FY is included

But this is beside the point
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Like I said, we have two projections, one from the CBO who of late hasn't been that accurate, and one from Trump which is unproven but we all know is self serving.
I don't really care about the CBO projection given their strict assumptions. That's why I asked what the Whitehouse based its projecttions on. If it's an actual empirical model then I would give it more credence.

Looking at OECD projections, it appears they're projecting about 2.6% growth through 2024; however, it's projecting a gradual decrease each year.
quote:

I hope Trump is right, you?
Sure. But I wouldn’t base my own budget on what I hope happens, and I also wouldn’t ignore the risk of growth below expectation. So why wouldn’t I expect the businessman outsider to do the same rather than the status quo way of doing things?
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I hope Trump is right, you?

Maybe we shouldn't be making such gigantic policy decisions on this kind of basis
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43961 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

The U.S. economy is running at its full potential for the first time in a decade,
WSJ

But I thought that Obama, Clinton, and the liberals said that 2% was the new normal. I guess that is why socialism always fails. It's based on ppl not meeting their potential.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:20 am to
quote:

The Atlanta Fed GDPNow will update their 4th quarter forecast tomorrow. That will be interesting. Their 4Q17 forecast currently stands at 3.4%.

Not a great update. 2.7%

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73228 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:23 am to
Do quarterly GDP estimates estimate growth for that quarter, or is it annualized?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Not a great update. 2.7%


Just noticed that.

After watching GDP Now for the last few months it's probably better to take every update with a grain of salt. Each update is based on a new economic report and this update in particular is based on "the forecast of fourth-quarter real consumer spending growth fell from 3.3 percent to 2.6 percent after this morning's personal income and outlays release from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis."

I've also notices that GDP Now forecast have been off about 0.6% each quarter versus the third and final estimate from the BEA.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Do quarterly GDP estimates estimate growth for that quarter, or is it annualized?


Just for the quarter.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:44 am to
in recent quarters it has tended to start off high and gradually taper
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:45 am to
they annualize it to an annualized rate (BEA)

GDPnow tries to predict what BEA will put out, so it's an annualized quarter too
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73228 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:45 am to
Wait, so does that mean our economy really grows like 8% on the year? If there are 4 quarters each with 2% growth.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Bingo, they'll find some outliers and push them to the forefront and tell us the recovery left these unfortunate people behind. They'll tell us its better for everyone to creep forward in a malaise than for many to jump forward with a few left behind.


"World to End: Poor, minorities hardest Hit"
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41866 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 12:16 pm to
Well me shoot from the hip guess was damn close, right?
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70783 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Growth above 3% is a sign of an economy heading towards instability. Ideal growth rate for our economy is between 2-3%, a number we’ve hit multiple times under Obama and, fortunately, it looks like we will be between 2-3% for 2017 too.



quote:

VOLhalla



Are you retarded?
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Well me shoot from the hip guess was damn close, right?


your post read like you were saying 2% is below the post-Clinton average, but that average turned out to be 1.8%
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Not a great update. 2.7%


GDPNow now forecasting 3.5% for the fourth quarter:

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram