- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:14 pm to Jbird
Somebody about to make a killin delivering these to DC.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:18 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
They are literally trying to kill plant life on Earth.
No they’re not, stupid. They are trying to limit the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere to about the amount it was 50 years ago. I’m 59, and I remember 50 years ago that ALL the plants weren’t dead.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:19 pm to Jbird
They could always just plant trees.
Just saying.
6CO2 + 6H20 + (energy) ? C6H12O6 + 6O2
Just saying.
6CO2 + 6H20 + (energy) ? C6H12O6 + 6O2
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:20 pm to umrebel2009
quote:
China and the other countries that have terrible air quality need the CO2 scrubbers. Our air quality isn't bad enough that we need them.
OMG, with people this stupid it’s just going to be impossible to carry on a Democratic Republic.
We all share the same atmosphere when it comes to CO2. It doesn’t matter who emits it or who captures and sequesters it.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:25 pm to EasterEgg
quote:
How are they going to store the CO2?
They are going to store it in places that are very similar to where it was stored before we mined and released it - in geologic reservoirs.
Louisiana and Texas and the offshore Gulf of Mexico have all the saline reservoirs we will ever need. We will capture the CO2 through various means, pipe it to injection wells and send it underground to carefully chosen reservoirs.
In direct carbon capture we will pull it out of the air, and then the rest is the same.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:27 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
I have long thought that capturing greenhouse gasses is the best way to remove them, but I’m not sure how/if that would work if electricity is used to power the machine.
Direct capture is not ready for prime time because it is extremely energy intensive. But if you use giant solar farms to power it then it will work. There are much better ways to reduce CO2, though. Eventually, when we have the new generation of nuclear power plants running, direct capture will work.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:36 pm to Penrod
You are the retard. We don’t need to remove any co2. There isn’t any empirical evidence it actually raises the temperature. It’s been the exact opposite throughout earth’s history. You think you are educated, but you are just manipulated
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:37 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
There is no problem whatsoever with the greenhouse gases now or anytime in the future. It’s all a lie
It has been greatly exaggerated, for sure, but there probably is a problem. We don’t know for sure, but it seems extremely likely that we will cause a great deal of global warming if we don’t start reducing greenhouse gases.
The lie wasn’t the theory; it was the timing. IN about 2007 Gore said that we had four years to act, otherwise it would be too late. Since, to Gore, acting meant implementing the Kyoto Protocols, it is clear that 15 years later we have still not “acted”. And Gore was, of course, full of shite.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 2:37 pm to Jbird
quote:
3.5 billion for
how about we start with clean water...
Posted on 5/20/22 at 4:52 pm to xxTIMMYxx
Okay, buddy. Me and Elon Musk have been scammed. What do we know?
Posted on 5/20/22 at 4:55 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
You are the retard. We don’t need to remove any co2.
You have lost the thread of the conversation. I didn’t take a position on whether we have a CO2 problem. I replied to a poster who wrote that China needed the CO2 scrubbers, because THEY had an air quality problem. I pointed out that there is only one atmosphere, so it doesn’t matter where CO2 is emitted or where it is scrubbed.
I think this shows clearly who the retard is.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 5:01 pm to Jbird
so let's kill green stuff to fight climate change.
kill babies.
crash the economy.
open the flood gates to immigrants that don't care about their own country and won't care about this one either.
sabotage supply chain/manufacturing.
ship jobs over seas/big tech hiring immigrants over americans. i know for a fact they do this at intel in hillsboro. a friend of mine was let go and replaced by some indian broad with little background. guy had a masters in electrical eng from stanford. that's just one example i'm aware of.
sexually confuse children to prey on them.
maybe these phags can have a ted talk about it.
not sure how people can't believe this isn't all on purpose.
kill babies.
crash the economy.
open the flood gates to immigrants that don't care about their own country and won't care about this one either.
sabotage supply chain/manufacturing.
ship jobs over seas/big tech hiring immigrants over americans. i know for a fact they do this at intel in hillsboro. a friend of mine was let go and replaced by some indian broad with little background. guy had a masters in electrical eng from stanford. that's just one example i'm aware of.
sexually confuse children to prey on them.
maybe these phags can have a ted talk about it.
not sure how people can't believe this isn't all on purpose.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 5:08 pm to Jbird
Will these machines be able to suck CO from other countries or will it just make the United States ozone levels. How much money will Pedo Joe have to print to pay for theses machines. Just when I think this administration has hit bottom they say hold my beer. Like another poster said, how much fossil fuel will it take to run these big machines. I wonder what democratic donor owns the company that makes these machines
Posted on 5/20/22 at 5:09 pm to Penrod
quote:
Louisiana and Texas and the offshore Gulf of Mexico have all the saline reservoirs we will ever need. We will capture the CO2 through various means, pipe it to injection wells and send it underground to carefully chosen reservoirs.
This can't possibly go wrong. So we are going to create giant, underground pockets of pressurized gas, in the Gulf of Mexico, just off the coast of Louisiana and Texas.
Also, would we be using oil rigs to do this? And putting it in the same pockets oil came out of?
Trust the science folks. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:03 pm to j1897
quote:
There's like 40 percent more co2 than in 1950. Were plants starving in 1950?
There is an exact amount of CO2 and it neither increases or decreases
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:10 pm to Jbird
That is a like putting a band-aid on ruptured aorta!!!
People need to understand that Mother Earth is a tough old bird! She can handle her shite.
And I can promise you this.....the Big Guy and his posse will benefit!
People need to understand that Mother Earth is a tough old bird! She can handle her shite.
And I can promise you this.....the Big Guy and his posse will benefit!
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:21 pm to Jbird
Pretty sure Chevron spent significantly more than this on their Gorgon project. Maybe look at some of the things to be learned from that.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:34 pm to Penrod
quote:
No they’re not, stupid. They are trying to limit the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere to about the amount it was 50 years ago. I’m 59, and I remember 50 years ago that ALL the plants weren’t dead.
Was the level of atmospheric CO2 in 1972 the standard we should strive for today? Who decided this? Why not limit the CO2 to what the level was in 1872? Wouldn’t that be even better? What will they do with the CO2 they capture?
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News