- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/8/25 at 5:19 am to Stagg8
quote:
Pretty weak conclusions on the authors’ part but not surprising. It’s a super, low-impact journal (2.8).
I think the strain is mutating. You need to go get 4 more vaccines so you will be safe or even better yet, double up on the 4 just to be safe. Also don't forget to wear a mask at all times and keep at least 10 feet apart from all humans. You can never be too cautious.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 6:58 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
lol, McCullough. is this 2022 again? He’s the same moron
McCullough: “it’s not a vaccine if 250 million people get the shots and then get infected”
Conclusion: moron
crazy: “if you get the shots you won’t get infected”
Conclusion: not a moron
What a fricked up world we live in
Posted on 9/8/25 at 7:01 am to Placekicker
quote:
??BREAKING: THREE Peer-Reviewed Studies Provide IRREFUTABLE Grounds for Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA Injections??
Two MAJOR papers were just published in the past 48 hours, building directly on our recent landmark study.
Together, the international evidence has converged: mRNA injections are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law ??
?? The Papers:
1?? COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion (Zywiec, Mavrakakis, McCullough, Hulscher, et al., Aug 2025)
• Legal/Ethical: both virus and injections contain engineered elements in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention
• Genomic forensics reveal engineered viral/vaccine features consistent with DARPA’s DEFUSE proposal
• Cardiovascular system: strong links to myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, and arrhythmias
• Reproductive system: high rates of pregnancy loss, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths
• Immune system: collapse marked by viral reactivation, autoimmune disease, and cancer acceleration
2?? Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal (Ueda, Fukushima, et al., Aug 2025)
• 103M people injected without any nationwide safety investigation or long-term monitoring
• Misclassified as “vaccines” rather than gene therapy products, bypassing stricter regulatory standards
• Critical studies never conducted — including biodistribution, organ toxicity, carcinogenicity, placental transfer, and fetal safety
• Independent labs detected plasmid DNA contamination, including SV40 promoter sequences with known oncogenic potential
• Legal and ethical breaches documented: concealment of harms, suppression of mortality data, and approvals granted without clinical trials
3??Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits (Hulscher, Bowden, McCullough, Jan 2025)
• 81,000+ physicians/scientists/citizens, 240 government officials, 17 professional physician and scientific organizations demand withdrawal
• VAERS-adjusted deaths >589K U.S.; ~17M global
• Exceeds FDA recall thresholds by 375,000%
• Negative efficacy: boosted = higher infection risk
• DNA contamination 65,000% above limits
??Together, these three studies converge on the same conclusion: Immediate global withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life.
Now is the time to stand on the right side of history — or be remembered by future generations as complicit in one of the greatest tragedies of our time.
Damn it... at least post it for everyone to see.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:16 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
moron
McCullough: “it’s not a vaccine if 250 million people get the shots and then get infected”
Conclusion: moron
Is that the only thing he said frick head?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:24 am to Placekicker
quote:
THREE Peer-Reviewed Studies Provide IRREFUTABLE Grounds for Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA Injections
I cringe at the word Peer-Reviewed because that means nothing.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:34 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Is that the only thing he said frick head?
He said plenty, nothing more impactful than that.
A personal hygiene FYI. You should spend a little more time in the shower, and shave that little mustache thing. Same for the little missus.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:37 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
He said plenty, nothing more impactful than that.
He was wrong quite a lot. Sorry you can't be honest here.
quote:
A personal hygiene FYI. You should spend a little more time in the shower, and shave that little mustache thing. Same for the little missus
Is this the best you can do? Sad!
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:49 am to crazy4lsu
Just a little too close to home.
Keep taking that Covid booster IV drip. If you stop you’ll be infected by noon.
Keep taking that Covid booster IV drip. If you stop you’ll be infected by noon.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 8:58 am to OccamsStubble
Not sending their best and what not.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:39 am to Placekicker
TigerDoc says these people are all lying liars.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:45 am to Placekicker
Let me know when you need something that is Pear- reviewed and I’ll take a look at it.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:58 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Is that the only thing he said frick head?
Dude just because you got the clot shot and all of the boosters and are probably going to die soon, don’t take it out on those of us who aren’t fricking clueless like you.
I mean I understand that misery loves company. But this is your shite.
Deal with it. No need to lash out on us.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:02 am to Errerrerrwere
He’s a vaxxed transgender they/them. Total freak show
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:13 am to SallysHuman
Yikes. If you look at where these were published at, it doesn't help. One was published in The Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons, which doesn't have a traditional impact factor like major, respected, peer-reviewed journals do. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons' publication "is primarily known for disseminating politically conservative views and medical misinformation, rather than being a research-focused journal with a measurable impact factor." That is from Google's AI Overview.
The other article is published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. Like the other journal, this one isn't a credible journal either and has been accused of being a fake journal with no credible editorial board.
The other article is published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. Like the other journal, this one isn't a credible journal either and has been accused of being a fake journal with no credible editorial board.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:18 am to AFtigerFan
quote:
Yikes. If you look at where these were published at, it doesn't help.
Would be true IF all these "reputable" journals didn't sell out their credibility.
quote:
That is from Google's AI Overview.
Not sure how highly I'd rate that.
I didn't read up on or comment on the article I posted, I simply found and pasted it in response to another poster asking for papers.
Public Health lost its credibility, so, anything can flourish now- everyone needs to decide for themselves how to proceed in their own lives.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:27 am to SallysHuman
quote:I went to the article's webpage, and I also looked them up on the journal lists. They are not highly regarded whatsoever. I agree with you that there are journals out there that are a self-licking ice cream cones, so-to-speak. However, journals with a bad reputation are just bad journals.
Not sure how highly I'd rate that.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:28 am to Placekicker
It’s a treatment, not a vax
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:32 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
It’s a treatment, not a vax
More of a symptom preventive than a treatment. Eventually, it was recognized as such, though I believe that if you were among the 95% or so that was neither sick or old, you would be far better today having avoided the shots, gotten covid, developed real immunity, and moved on rather than having gotten multiple shots and boosters and having developed a muted immune response.
Popular
Back to top


0








