Started By
Message

re: 2025 trade deficit higher than 2024 trade deficit

Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
10032 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:55 pm to
It’s funny how Marxist/Dems are only interested in trade in when the other party is in power and it “looks” like it isn’t good.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173666 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

It’s funny how Marxist/Dems are only interested in trade in when the other party is in power and it “looks” like it isn’t good

If you think I'm a marxist you might need to see a therapist
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
994 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Sure as long as you're consistently doing that no matter which why they're moving
As long as we are importing things that we do not actually manufacture, why is this such a flashpoint?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47575 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:04 pm to
I think there’s a reason you don’t want to show your work. Maybe it’s because without Trumps first 90 days in office where trade deficits were at massive highs, the trade deficit has been at historic lows. And they still almost pulled it off.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173666 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:07 pm to
quote:


I think there’s a reason you don’t want to show your work.

I didn't come up with the numbers

It comes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis

I work in the private sector
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2918 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

I added a link to the OP for convenience


well the thrust of that article was that tariffs weren't hurting trade. surprisingly.

that being the case jethrine, if tariffs aren't hurting trade and they're not raising prices then we should leave them in place, was that your point?

you really are dog schit stupid.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24007 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

The U.S. trade deficit totaled $839.5 billion through the first 11 months of 2025, compared with $806.5 billion in the same period in 2024.

So Joe Biden was a better administrator of the money than Trump?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173666 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:


So Joe Biden was a better administrator of the money than Trump?

I don't recall saying that
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37998 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Powerman

Return in 12 months with an update. The trajectory puts on on the correct path and to be at a lower deficit than 2024 by mid-year.

If it holds, will you eat crow?
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25823 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:56 pm to
I would like to see it broken down by QTR and maybe even month. They should be able to do rolling year over year as well as we progress into 2026. The details matter, not the talking points.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173666 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:


Return in 12 months with an update. The trajectory puts on on the correct path and to be at a lower deficit than 2024 by mid-year.

If it holds, will you eat crow?

There is nothing to eat crow about since I made no predictions about 2026
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47575 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:06 pm to
You definitely make excuses for them here.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138899 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

I didn't come up with the numbers

It comes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis
Figures don't lie. But liars figure, and in this case they hooked you. They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173666 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Figures don't lie. But liars figure, and in this case they hooked you. They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical

I'm looking beyond what you're looking at. You know and I know that everyone here bitching had no idea that this was the case.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23055 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Be honest with yourself. Did you know this or did you think the opposite was true?



A lot of people a lot more educated than you or I would say the first 6 months of any new administration is spent try to clean up what was given to it. Fortunately, what POTUS Trump did in March 2025 was outstanding and those numbers since certainly reflect it.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23055 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

I've been told that Trump's trade policy would reduce the trade deficit and that would be awesome awesome


So if a country has a trade deficit of 850 billion but brings in 600 billion in tariff income, what is the real deficit?
Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28221 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:32 pm to
I've been told to fix anything that has been fricked up, frauded, rigged and stolen from for at least two consecutive decades requires a little more time than 1 calendar year to fix

Thank goodness I have common sense and already kind of figured this out on my own
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:36 pm to
Marketwatch told me the Ukrainians sunk a Russian battleship last week.

Well not really MW, but one of their spam emails that you are added to when you unsubscribe to MW’s emails.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15728 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:39 pm to
Tariffs have been the greatest thing to ever happen to our economy - it is getting better and better. And if you sold products from overseas then screw you commie.
Hopefully Trump has taught you to sell American products the hard way. I don’t shed a tear if you built your business selling furniture from India.

The mid terms are going to be amazing with a red wave
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 9:40 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63332 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical.
Not necessarily. For example there was one lone mass market bike manufacturer that closed in NC earlie this year, because of tariffs. Now you might ask yourself “why would a domestic manufacturer close due to tariffs?”

Simple. Most of their machines, machine tooling parts, supplies, raw materials, and components all have to be imported. No domestic sources and none anywhere on the horizon. Tariffs put their COGS well beyond their profit margins and, for the most part made their machines unserviceable.

To make it even worse, the tariffs on the finished goods is lower than it is on most of their raw materials. So the move to relocate manufacturing makes complete sense. Had two clients face the same thing.

It’s pretty clear our trade policy isn’t aimed at returning manufacturing, nor maximizing revenue. It’s about generating tag, rah, headlines, and that’s about it.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 9:46 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram