- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:55 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
It’s funny how Marxist/Dems are only interested in trade in when the other party is in power and it “looks” like it isn’t good
If you think I'm a marxist you might need to see a therapist
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:58 pm to Powerman
quote:As long as we are importing things that we do not actually manufacture, why is this such a flashpoint?
Sure as long as you're consistently doing that no matter which why they're moving
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:04 pm to Powerman
I think there’s a reason you don’t want to show your work. Maybe it’s because without Trumps first 90 days in office where trade deficits were at massive highs, the trade deficit has been at historic lows. And they still almost pulled it off.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:07 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I think there’s a reason you don’t want to show your work.
I didn't come up with the numbers
It comes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis
I work in the private sector
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:10 pm to Powerman
quote:
I added a link to the OP for convenience
well the thrust of that article was that tariffs weren't hurting trade. surprisingly.
that being the case jethrine, if tariffs aren't hurting trade and they're not raising prices then we should leave them in place, was that your point?
you really are dog schit stupid.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:11 pm to Powerman
quote:
The U.S. trade deficit totaled $839.5 billion through the first 11 months of 2025, compared with $806.5 billion in the same period in 2024.
So Joe Biden was a better administrator of the money than Trump?
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:12 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
So Joe Biden was a better administrator of the money than Trump?
I don't recall saying that
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:11 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
Return in 12 months with an update. The trajectory puts on on the correct path and to be at a lower deficit than 2024 by mid-year.
If it holds, will you eat crow?
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:56 pm to Powerman
I would like to see it broken down by QTR and maybe even month. They should be able to do rolling year over year as well as we progress into 2026. The details matter, not the talking points.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:58 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Return in 12 months with an update. The trajectory puts on on the correct path and to be at a lower deficit than 2024 by mid-year.
If it holds, will you eat crow?
There is nothing to eat crow about since I made no predictions about 2026
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:06 pm to Powerman
You definitely make excuses for them here.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:00 pm to Powerman
quote:Figures don't lie. But liars figure, and in this case they hooked you. They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical.
I didn't come up with the numbers
It comes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Figures don't lie. But liars figure, and in this case they hooked you. They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical
I'm looking beyond what you're looking at. You know and I know that everyone here bitching had no idea that this was the case.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:08 pm to Powerman
quote:
Be honest with yourself. Did you know this or did you think the opposite was true?
A lot of people a lot more educated than you or I would say the first 6 months of any new administration is spent try to clean up what was given to it. Fortunately, what POTUS Trump did in March 2025 was outstanding and those numbers since certainly reflect it.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:11 pm to Powerman
quote:
I've been told that Trump's trade policy would reduce the trade deficit and that would be awesome awesome
So if a country has a trade deficit of 850 billion but brings in 600 billion in tariff income, what is the real deficit?
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:32 pm to Powerman
I've been told to fix anything that has been fricked up, frauded, rigged and stolen from for at least two consecutive decades requires a little more time than 1 calendar year to fix
Thank goodness I have common sense and already kind of figured this out on my own
Thank goodness I have common sense and already kind of figured this out on my own
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:36 pm to Powerman
Marketwatch told me the Ukrainians sunk a Russian battleship last week.
Well not really MW, but one of their spam emails that you are added to when you unsubscribe to MW’s emails.
Well not really MW, but one of their spam emails that you are added to when you unsubscribe to MW’s emails.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:39 pm to bignuss18
Tariffs have been the greatest thing to ever happen to our economy - it is getting better and better. And if you sold products from overseas then screw you commie.
Hopefully Trump has taught you to sell American products the hard way. I don’t shed a tear if you built your business selling furniture from India.
The mid terms are going to be amazing with a red wave
Hopefully Trump has taught you to sell American products the hard way. I don’t shed a tear if you built your business selling furniture from India.
The mid terms are going to be amazing with a red wave
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Not necessarily. For example there was one lone mass market bike manufacturer that closed in NC earlie this year, because of tariffs. Now you might ask yourself “why would a domestic manufacturer close due to tariffs?”
They imply impeding foreign imports while boosting domestic production leads to increased US trade deficits. That is nonsensical.
Simple. Most of their machines, machine tooling parts, supplies, raw materials, and components all have to be imported. No domestic sources and none anywhere on the horizon. Tariffs put their COGS well beyond their profit margins and, for the most part made their machines unserviceable.
To make it even worse, the tariffs on the finished goods is lower than it is on most of their raw materials. So the move to relocate manufacturing makes complete sense. Had two clients face the same thing.
It’s pretty clear our trade policy isn’t aimed at returning manufacturing, nor maximizing revenue. It’s about generating tag, rah, headlines, and that’s about it.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 9:46 pm
Popular
Back to top


1













