Started By
Message

re: 200 year old live oak or Dollar General?

Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:46 pm to
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109840 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

you don't agree with government at all levels protecting parks and wildlife areas for a couple hundred years?


That's quite the extrapolation for what I said with regard this apparent small commercial piece of property, but no I'm a big fan of protecting public lands.
Posted by Violent Hip Swivel
Member since Aug 2023
8396 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Cut it. It is a tree.


This is the mentality that explains why so much of the south looks so sad and white trashy and thrown away.
Posted by CaneyLake
Member since Jun 2023
846 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

The fetishization of nature is a pagan impulse. and a hallmark of anti-humanism.


Oh frick off, there is a dollar general around every corner of every town in the south. A 200 year old live oak is special, especially in an urban area.



This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 4:51 pm
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
17749 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:49 pm to
No pics of tree .. I am disappoint
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
25779 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:49 pm to
You are more than welcome to relocate the tree at your own cost.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109840 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

No pics of tree .. I am disappoint


It would be nice to see what we are talking about.
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3711 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

I'm a big fan of protecting public lands.


cheers

Posted by Maytheporkbewithyou
Member since Aug 2016
13927 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:55 pm to
It's just an oak tree. Cut it down and plant a new one somewhere else.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116826 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:55 pm to
The condition of the tree should be considered. You can get an objective arborist from a Univ. ag-center. If he says it will make it to 400 y.o. then the tree should stay.
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4608 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:56 pm to
Team Oak tree.

Hopefully there can be a compromise

Dollar tree with an Oak tree courtyard.

Nice...

Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7376 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Oh frick off, there is a dollar general around every corner of every town in the south. A 200 year old live oak is special, especially in an urban area.


The world was a better place when we still realized the dirt worshippers were uncivilized.
Posted by beulahland
Little D'arbonne
Member since Jan 2013
4002 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 4:58 pm to
There are older live oaks everywhere.
Just make sure everyone gets to hug the tree before they crank the chainsaw.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46064 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

I’m not being argumentative, I’n just talking it out.

What about acres and acres of long leaf pine forest being cleared for a housing development?

There is a church near me that wiped out acres of woods just because they wanted fill dirt. Another one took down a bunch of hardwoods because they wanted to expand their parking lot.
Solomon commanded that an abundance of tall cedars from Lebanon be cut down to be used in the making of the Temple. Granted, that was a one-off event, but shows that God thought it more important to have a temple created than old cedar trees remain unfelled.

Trees, rocks, bushes, and shrubs have always needed to be cleared for housing/building projects, even in the Bible. In Joshua 17:14-18, Joshua told the tribe of Joseph to clear trees and make land for themselves when they complained about not having enough for the amount of people they had.

I'd say that clearing the land for the sake of human development and prosperity is not bad in and of itself. It can be bad if we stop being good stewards over what we have and instead abuse it. Cutting down trees for no purpose and wasting the land and timber would probably be an example of abuse that we shouldn't participate in. But clearing trees to build a business, for instance, is not a bad use.
Posted by geauxtigers
biloxi ms
Member since Nov 2003
2578 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
17770 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:15 pm to
DG

It's their property
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
18525 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:20 pm to
We have five hundred year old burr oaks around here that they have built around. So you can save the tree and build.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42303 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

What say you?

We have a lot of live oaks here in SC. I believe the ten oldest live oaks in the country are all in SEC states, SC, LA, TX, GA. I used to know the names of them all. Angel Oak is my favorite in Charleston and I've been to The Sisters in Mandeville, LA and one in Texas who's name escapes me at the moment.

Angel Oak is the oldest living thing east of the Mississippi to the best of my knowledge, last I heard, since I was a kid.

We're talking 600-1000 years old on the live oaks above.

Something you come to grasps with as you get older ... nothing lasts forever. And as much destruction as we humans do in our current phase for the past few hundred years, nature keeps bouncing back and will continue to do so 'till the end.

Progress, which ALWAYS includes encroachment, will not stop for a tree. I'm a zealous Constitutional Conservative and MAGA Republican .... and a save the whales, don't slaughter elephants, quit cutting down old growth forests old man.

Your tree is history. There is nothing anyone can do about it. We'll never know what we've got 'till it's gone.





Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
72120 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I’d say, unless the tree had been a witness to some major historical event, it’s more than likely outlived its use to wildlife and should be cut. At that age, it’s more than likely no longer producing acorns and isn’t good for much more than providing shade or offering a place for birds to rest.


You don't know much, huh?
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25116 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:24 pm to
It is just a tree, not a national treasure. Trees can live for a long time, that does not make them worthy of worship.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16440 posts
Posted on 8/19/25 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

This is the mentality that explains why so much of the south looks so sad and white trashy and thrown away.


As opposed to the beautiful scenery of the concrete jungles of the north along with the fantastic remnants of the rust belt.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram