- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: $1B In Taxpayer Money For the Ballroom
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:35 am to AggieDub14
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:35 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Taxpayers should if they're expected to pay for it
First, taxpayers are not paying for it; it is being funded from private donations. Second, the billion dollars they are talking about is for a giant underground bunker complex that is being built partially under the ballroom. It’s cheaper that way, otherwise they would have had to do it all with tunneling, I guess.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:36 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
That’s hilariously a dumb defense.
38,000 times.
Nothing is dumber than 38,000 times
Well the OP is dumber
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:37 am to udtiger
Hilariously dumb defense is dumb.
At best, you’re saying “well, ya know what, this pedophile pisses off a lot of good people. And I just like that aspect of all of it. Trump just pisses people off. So, I’ll look past it. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.”
38,000x
At best, you’re saying “well, ya know what, this pedophile pisses off a lot of good people. And I just like that aspect of all of it. Trump just pisses people off. So, I’ll look past it. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.”
38,000x
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:38 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Hilariously dumb defense is dumb.
At best, you’re saying “well, ya know what, this pedophile pisses off a lot of good people. And I just like that aspect of all of it. Trump just pisses people off. So, I’ll look past it. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.”
38,000x
Okay, I get it now. You're retarded.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:38 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
CrystalPreserves
Your whining gets weaker and weaker
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:40 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
The naivety
Yep, Democrats will will vote Democrat no matter how much money their party steals from taxpayers.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:40 am to udtiger
CP is an America hating goose-stepper. You can bet that he wishes Trump had been assassinated.
The left is vile, and violent.
The left is vile, and violent.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:44 am to AggieDub14
I love starting my day reading the commies melting over the dumbest shite
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:45 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
At best, you’re saying “well, ya know what, this pedophile pisses off a lot of good people. And I just like that aspect of all of it. Trump just pisses people off. So, I’ll look past it. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.”
So you’re saying democrats had verifiable proof trump was a pedophile and rather than release those files that they had control over that proved such, they hid the proof and refused to release it.
The democrats then doubled down and said the Epstein files were a nothing burger. The democrats then undemocratically anointed their chosen candidate while yelling the republicans are a threat to democracy.
Then once the republicans won and trump starts to release the Epstein files you magically believe and parrot the leftist talking points that the Epstein files somehow prove trump was a pedophile?
THATS what you believe?
This post was edited on 5/12/26 at 6:46 am
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:53 am to AggieDub14
Wow, 19x less than what Somali’s have received illegally THAT WE KNOW OF in Somalia.
How much went to Gavin’s monorail to nowhere?
How much to Karen Bass’ homeless epidemic that increased?
How much to Ukraine??
How much when Biden stated selling off pieces of the wall that were laying around?
How much to house illegals (to this day) in Nee York City hotels?
You do understand that figs like Obama will benefit from a more secure White House as well, right?
I love Democrats talking about fiscal responsibility.
How much went to Gavin’s monorail to nowhere?
How much to Karen Bass’ homeless epidemic that increased?
How much to Ukraine??
How much when Biden stated selling off pieces of the wall that were laying around?
How much to house illegals (to this day) in Nee York City hotels?
You do understand that figs like Obama will benefit from a more secure White House as well, right?
I love Democrats talking about fiscal responsibility.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:58 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Soviet Union, the country was led by octogenarians who spent a lot of money on decadent projects while their citizens got poorer
Kim Jong Un is relatively young, and he does the same thing. What's your point?
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:58 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
He’s molested underage kids.
So many retard takes
Posted on 5/12/26 at 6:58 am to Penrod
quote:
I think he was expecting you to see an analogy.
Yes, which is why I pointed out how his analogy doesn't work here.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:02 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
38,000 times.
What are we talking about here?
How many times Clinton flew on the jet or Biden showered with his daughter?
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:05 am to AggieDub14
[quote]Is it winning when we are told it won't cost the taxpayers a dime then the cost goes up 4-5x and [/quot
This is exactly the type of stuff we should be worried/concerned about.
There’s nothing else important going on currently. We should just have a civil war over a ball room since that’s all communists want to talk about and not the fraud or chopping off dicks etc etc etc
figs
This is exactly the type of stuff we should be worried/concerned about.
There’s nothing else important going on currently. We should just have a civil war over a ball room since that’s all communists want to talk about and not the fraud or chopping off dicks etc etc etc
figs
This post was edited on 5/12/26 at 7:06 am
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:13 am to jrobic4
From Grok:
38,000 (or "38000") refers to the approximate number of references to Donald Trump (plus terms like Melania Trump, Mar-a-Lago, etc.) found by the New York Times in a large 2026 release of Justice Department/Epstein-related files.
nytimes.com
Context from the filesThe NYT reviewed newly released documents (part of a multi-million-page tranche) and identified more than 5,300 files containing over 38,000 references to Trump and related terms.
nytimes.com
Many of these are incidental: news clippings, mentions of Mar-a-Lago (Epstein had social ties in Palm Beach), or broader searches. Trump and Epstein were known to be acquaintances in the 1980s–2000s before a falling out.
pbs.org
A smaller portion includes unverified FBI tips (over a dozen) alleging sexual misconduct by Trump in connection with Epstein. These were compiled by the FBI but described by the Justice Department as lacking credibility; no charges or substantiated findings resulted from them.
yahoo.com
How it's used in claims about Trump being a pedophileCritics and opponents (especially on social media and from some Democrats) cite the "38,000 mentions" as evidence of deep involvement or a cover-up, often pairing it with:Old, unproven allegations (e.g., a dropped 2016 lawsuit claiming an incident with a 13-year-old).Epstein flight logs or past social photos.Broader guilt-by-association with Epstein's network.This number has become a viral shorthand in anti-Trump rhetoric to suggest he must be guilty because his name appears so frequently.
facebook.com
Important caveatsVolume ? evidence of guilt: Large document dumps on high-profile figures naturally generate thousands of hits from media mentions, tips, cross-references, and tangential material. The DOJ has stated the tips were not deemed credible enough for further action.
livemint.com
Trump has not been charged with any Epstein-related crimes. He banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after an alleged incident involving a minor and cooperated with investigators in the past.Similar scrutiny has applied to other prominent figures (Bill Clinton, etc.) named in Epstein documents, with varying levels of substantiated misconduct.In short, 38,000 is a search-hit count from a massive file release, not a direct count of crimes or victims. It's being weaponized in partisan attacks, but the underlying tips remain unverified hearsay according to authorities.
************************
In other words, baseless retardation at best. Likely just mendacious falsehood as per the Left.
38,000 (or "38000") refers to the approximate number of references to Donald Trump (plus terms like Melania Trump, Mar-a-Lago, etc.) found by the New York Times in a large 2026 release of Justice Department/Epstein-related files.
nytimes.com
Context from the filesThe NYT reviewed newly released documents (part of a multi-million-page tranche) and identified more than 5,300 files containing over 38,000 references to Trump and related terms.
nytimes.com
Many of these are incidental: news clippings, mentions of Mar-a-Lago (Epstein had social ties in Palm Beach), or broader searches. Trump and Epstein were known to be acquaintances in the 1980s–2000s before a falling out.
pbs.org
A smaller portion includes unverified FBI tips (over a dozen) alleging sexual misconduct by Trump in connection with Epstein. These were compiled by the FBI but described by the Justice Department as lacking credibility; no charges or substantiated findings resulted from them.
yahoo.com
How it's used in claims about Trump being a pedophileCritics and opponents (especially on social media and from some Democrats) cite the "38,000 mentions" as evidence of deep involvement or a cover-up, often pairing it with:Old, unproven allegations (e.g., a dropped 2016 lawsuit claiming an incident with a 13-year-old).Epstein flight logs or past social photos.Broader guilt-by-association with Epstein's network.This number has become a viral shorthand in anti-Trump rhetoric to suggest he must be guilty because his name appears so frequently.
facebook.com
Important caveatsVolume ? evidence of guilt: Large document dumps on high-profile figures naturally generate thousands of hits from media mentions, tips, cross-references, and tangential material. The DOJ has stated the tips were not deemed credible enough for further action.
livemint.com
Trump has not been charged with any Epstein-related crimes. He banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after an alleged incident involving a minor and cooperated with investigators in the past.Similar scrutiny has applied to other prominent figures (Bill Clinton, etc.) named in Epstein documents, with varying levels of substantiated misconduct.In short, 38,000 is a search-hit count from a massive file release, not a direct count of crimes or victims. It's being weaponized in partisan attacks, but the underlying tips remain unverified hearsay according to authorities.
************************
In other words, baseless retardation at best. Likely just mendacious falsehood as per the Left.
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:16 am to AggieDub14
Hahaha. It’s not for the Ballroom. It’s for a military complex under the ballroom with meeting rooms/ safe rooms and skids you imbeciles.
This post was edited on 5/12/26 at 7:28 am
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:23 am to offshoretrash
quote:
Dirty politicians have royalty screwed us and we may never get our debt paid off.
That’s what this thread is about
Posted on 5/12/26 at 7:26 am to AggieDub14
TDS treatments now available at CVS!
Popular
Back to top


0








