- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 181 Million Views and counting... damn, that is amazing
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:33 am to the808bass
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:33 am to the808bass
quote:
It means that the tweet was in a person’s feed 181 million times.
Right, and that's a lot. That's not typical.
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 10:34 am
2
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:35 am to imjustafatkid
Elon Musk RT'd it- every one of his 154.2M followers "viewed" it
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:36 am to GhostOfFreedom
Tucker:
But I’ll suck deez nuts for views. Gobble gobble.
quote:
I hate him passionately
But I’ll suck deez nuts for views. Gobble gobble.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:37 am to imjustafatkid
quote:If Elon Musk, owner of X retweets it with over 150 million followers, what do you think happens?
That's not typical.
I can assure you it's extremely typical
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:38 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Melt al you want, psychotic dipshite
Sweet. Delicious. Melt.
as usual I am telling the truth
your odd reaction is you being able to peek out from beneath the brainwashing psychoses under which you have been laboring
Nobody in my house is melting.. maybe you can manage getting through the brainwashing to get to truth some day
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:44 am to imjustafatkid
The tweet got that many views. The video did not.
There’s no mor simple way to explain it than how it’s been explained in this thread. You just aren’t able to understand it at this point.
There’s no mor simple way to explain it than how it’s been explained in this thread. You just aren’t able to understand it at this point.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:44 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
as usual I am telling the truth
I'm eagerly awaiting your next copy-paste loop...
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:45 am to pankReb
quote:
The tweet got that many views. The video did not.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:49 am to Jjdoc
I’m aware that truth is upsetting to you. No need to remind everyone.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:51 am to GhostOfFreedom
great interview by Trump. but tucker almost choking when he said he was not a a conspiracy theorist "at all." the guy believes in space aliens
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:53 am to Fun Bunch
Does it have more than anything Biden has ever done?
Why are Dems ignorant jackasses?
Why are Dems ignorant jackasses?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:57 am to msutiger
Someone want to tell him that Twitter is global?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:58 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
You seem to be misunderstanding what number of views means. It's a good indicator of reach, but that's about it.
Quite literally my entire point so why have you been arguing against it?
We agree that the video did NOT get 190+ million views.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I knew you guys would do this and predicted it
Let’s pretend it only had a 1/3 of the views. That’s a hell of a lot more than that sorry arse debate.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:06 am to FlexDawg
quote:
Let’s pretend it only had a 1/3 of the views.
Why?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:08 am to GhostOfFreedom
Over 200mil 
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:09 am to Fun Bunch
You are correct it doesn’t have anywhere near 181 million, it’s 23 million more at 204 million
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:10 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I knew you guys would do this and predicted it
It does not have 181 million views, or anywhere close to that. That is not at all what that number means. But believe on King
It means impressions. The number is important for ad exposure. If an X post gets an impression then associated ads are also very likely being viewed.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:10 am to FlexDawg
quote:
Let’s pretend it only had a 1/3 of the views. That’s a hell of a lot more than that sorry arse debate.
What sources are you using to quantify "watchers"?
You guys want to go off of twitter metrics which doesn't quantify length of view, or anything other than clicking on the link.
Conversely, what measurable statistics for watching are you using for the debates? Streaming services? Cable? Twitter clicks? Clips?
It's not apples to apples, and it's not an intelligent argument. You are looking at "clicks" and tap dancing around like you won something. It's very strange.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:11 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I knew you guys would do this and predicted it
It does not have 181 million views, or anywhere close to that. That is not at all what that number means. But believe on King
Trump got the most real votes of any presidential candidate ever and you guys really dont think the most popular president ever and the most popular guy on cable would get views?
Like seriously?
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 11:12 am
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News