- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:25 pm to AlterEd
AlterEd:
LOGIC:
Premise 1: SFP should not comment.
Premise 2: RN has as much right to comment as SFP.
Conclusion: RN should not comment.
quote:AlterEd:
Nor should you, in that case.
quote:So . . . RN should not comment on it.
She has just as much a right to comment on the case, regardless her proximity to it, as you do.
LOGIC:
Premise 1: SFP should not comment.
Premise 2: RN has as much right to comment as SFP.
Conclusion: RN should not comment.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:26 pm to L.A.
"if it takes just 1 life......"
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
Laugh at it all you want, clown. Everyone here can see what you said.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:26 pm to L.A.
That "RN" is either 300 pounds with XY chromosomes and no medical licensure to speak of or a bot
Come on people
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:26 pm to Salviati
You skipped the part where SFPLC said that she shouldn't comment on it first.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:28 pm to AlterEd
quote:Irrelevant because you agreed with him.
You skipped the part where SFPLC said that she shouldn't comment on it first.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:28 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You skipped the part where SFPLC said that she shouldn't comment on it firs
If she truly is a medical professional, she shouldn’t be commenting on someone’s cause of death without data behind the conclusion.
But if she’s a random bot on the Internet, she can yap as much as she wants.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:29 pm to Salviati
quote:
Irrelevant because you agreed with him.
No I didn't, because I never said SFPLC shouldn't comment on it. You're putting words in my mouth.
I can see this is going to be one of those topics where multiple shill types flock here and lie their frickin asses off.
What I said is that if he is going to try to deny someone's right to comment on the case, he shouldn't either.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
just a couple of questions.
do you think the vaccine was billed as advertised? was it effective?
did you take it?
after taking it, how many times did you catch covid?
do you think the vaccine was billed as advertised? was it effective?
did you take it?
after taking it, how many times did you catch covid?
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:32 pm to AlterEd
quote:Hmmm.
No I didn't, because I never said SFPLC shouldn't comment on it. You're putting words in my mouth.
I can see this is going to be one of those topics where multiple shill types flock here and lie their frickin asses off.
quote:Look, I understand that you're not very intelligent.
Nor should you, in that case.
But you can't use your stupidity as an excuse.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:33 pm to Salviati
quote:
Nor should you, in that case.
Look, I understand that you're not very intelligent.
But you can't use your stupidity as an excuse.
As I said:
quote:
What I said is that if he is going to try to deny someone's right to comment on the case, he shouldn't either.
Don't pretend to be fricking retarded.
Does this post I made here not make that obvious?
quote:
Irrelevant. She has just as much a right to comment on the case, regardless her proximity to it, as you do.
So really all your "logic breakdown" does is agree with SFPLC that a nurse shouldn't comment on this.
You're not nearly as clever as you think you are. You're both fools.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:34 pm to Rebel
quote:
do you think the vaccine was billed as advertised? was it effective?
No
quote:
did you take it?
Yes but not for medical reasons
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
did you take it?
Yes but not for medical reasons
As usual, you just love to say stupid stuff to start an argument.
What I took out of that lady’s comment is not that she treated the kid, but that she has seen this happen, and that the cause of death gets blamed on something different.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:43 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
As usual, you just love to say stupid stuff to start an argument.
Of course. He is a paid shill. When a topic is created people can literally predict when this dipshit is going to enter the thread and what he is going to say.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes but not for medical reasons
how many times did you catch covid after taking it? i'm not trying to embarasses you. i'm curious as to your experience.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Does she even know if he got the vaccine or when his last booster was?
Of course she doesn't. But never miss an opportunity to get that X clout!
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:54 pm to Rebel
quote:
how many times did you catch covid after taking it?
Once (that I know of), years later, with no symptoms
I had OG Covid once, possibly twice (I was talking to my intelligent/educated friends about this Thursday night) so after that there was little Covid could do to me.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:54 pm to AlterEd
Sigh. You really aren't very bright are you.
Let's examine what transpired:
1. The RN began her comment with a post about her credentials and then gave her opinion on the cause of death:
2. You suggested that people should not dismiss her opinion just because she is an RN. You made an oblique appeal to her authority:
3. SFP did not say that she has no right to comment. To the contrary, SFP rebutted her and your appeal to authority by stating that her credentials as a health care professional are irrelevant if she does not know the health care facts:
4. You said that SFP should not give his opinion on the cause of death if he does not know the health care facts:
5. Ergo, your retort to my post is inaccurate and illogical:
Let's examine what transpired:
1. The RN began her comment with a post about her credentials and then gave her opinion on the cause of death:
quote:
I'm an RN, and this is the 3rd case like this just this week. These are strokes in the very young likely caused by the covid vaccine. Hospitals in AZ are trying to say Valley Fever caused it, yeah right
2. You suggested that people should not dismiss her opinion just because she is an RN. You made an oblique appeal to her authority:
quote:
In before people dismiss this because it's a nurse saying it.
3. SFP did not say that she has no right to comment. To the contrary, SFP rebutted her and your appeal to authority by stating that her credentials as a health care professional are irrelevant if she does not know the health care facts:
quote:
Did this nurse actually treat the kid?
If not, regardless of her credentials, she should not be weighing in like this.
Does she even know if he got the vaccine or when his last booster was?
4. You said that SFP should not give his opinion on the cause of death if he does not know the health care facts:
quote:At no point did SFP say that RN had no right to comment. At no point did SFP give his opinion on the cause of death.
Nor should you, in that case.
5. Ergo, your retort to my post is inaccurate and illogical:
quote:I don't think you're pretending to be fricking retarded.
What I said is that if he is going to try to deny someone's right to comment on the case, he shouldn't either.
This post was edited on 4/25/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 4/25/26 at 1:56 pm to Salviati
Your error is in thinking AlterEd has a logical bone in his body.
Popular
Back to top



2






