Started By
Message

re: 1/2 ton diesel engines

Posted on 2/15/22 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by LSUfanNkaty
LC, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
11109 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Have 18k on my Silverado 3.0


Yep. I have 28k on mine and love it.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81674 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

For what?
why do you care?

Curiosity.
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
2839 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Non-existant market, as the 5.0 cummins proved.


It is hard to get anyone to pay that high of a premium for a diesel in a half ton. Like was said the market is not there, but a less expensive torque monster with "better fuel economy" is what there is a market for right now. If you truly need a 5L diesel, you truly need more than a 1/2 ton anyway.

I say "better fuel economy" bc unless you are trying to save the environment, you are not saving $$$$ going with the diesel.

The price of the motor option and the maintenance will be a wash when compared to any gas engine of today. (I have driven a 3/4 ton diesel for over 25 years, so I am not bashing them.)

Unless you are a hot shot, farm, construction, OTR, or have money the close to $9000 premium for the diesel on a 3/4 ton can buy a lot of fuel, add on DEF, and the eventual cleaning or replacement of the DPF and it gets even worse. The govt f'd up the advantages of having a car/truck diesel around 2005. They are now well on their way to f'ing up the advantages in farm/industrial equipment.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57463 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

What do you want? A 6 liter diesel making 1000 ft-lbs of torque in a half ton truck with 7 tons of towing capacity and a 10 speed transmission that runs 12's and gets 40mpg?
holy exaggeration batman!
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 4:40 pm to
Well you've only given a Ricky Bobby answer to what you want so I'm genuinely curious what would tickle your pickle in this market segment. The "heavy half" thing was attempted by Nissan and the market has proven it won't support a premium price for non-premium fuel economy in a half ton truck. The people who want/need power are buying big trucks. The people who want fuel economy and moderate capability are buying half tons. You seem to be in some kind of really weird middle ground where the 14k lbs or whatever these trucks can tow isn't enough, the 400+ ft-lbs they put out isn't enough, but an HD truck is too big.

Posted by down time
space
Member since Oct 2013
1914 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

The 7.3 powerstroke made 250 hp in 2001


I had a 2001. A $300 tuner added 150hp with the off road setting. Plus exhaust. Noisy thing compared to my new 6.7 but the old truck felt about as strong.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19612 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 6:10 pm to
Bow does the 3.0 compare with the 5.3 in towing capacity?

How about with that tuner and intake? I am intrigued.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

for non-premium fuel economy in a half ton truck
aren't the car companies required to get to an avg of 40mpg in a few years anyway? They can't start rolling out guzzlers
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:07 pm to
3.0 diesel = 9500lbs 23/33 mpg (277hp and 460lb tq)

5.3 = 11500lbs 14/21mpg (355hp and 383tq)

I'm not sure why the diesel isn't rated higher with so much more torque. Guessing engine weight?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:14 pm to
Engine weight and associated other stuff (transmission, etc) knock it down some. I doubt its 2000 lbs of extra shite though. They likely have shallower gear ratios to hit those fuel economy numbers.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:18 pm to
That makes sense. You would think the goal for them would be a comparable towing cap. But I guess that mpg mandate is more pressing

Fyi - ram diesel has the same towing cap (12750lbs) as the hemi...with the same mpg as chevy. So they figured it out.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:23 pm
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19612 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:22 pm to
The 2022 are rated for 13300 for certain models. Add tge mods and you can get equivalent HP. Looks like I may be looking at GM again instead of Ford for my next truck.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:26 pm to
Looks like that 13300 is for the 6.2
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57463 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

You seem to be in some kind of really weird middle ground
well......I do drive a raptor. Is that middle ground?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:45 pm to
Ahhh. It all makes sense now
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:47 pm to
Dude don't buy any new diesel planning to mod it, especially not these small ones. Itll have more power than you can use as is, and a warranty.

I really don't care for the belt drive oil pump on the duramax, but I think it's made into a bigger deal than it really is. You can't have a full gear drive setup without making noise and im sure there were strict noise requirements.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27301 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Bow does the 3.0 compare with the 5.3 in towing capacity?


In the new 2022 models, the 3.0 is rated at 13,000 lbs (4x4) and the 5.3 is rated 11,000 (4x4).

The only gear option given was 3.23. Maybe that will change in the future. I would have gotten a 3.55 if it was available.

quote:

How about with that tuner and intake? I am intrigued.


I was looking at S&B cold air intake ($349) and an Ag/Diesel Solutions tuner ($445). They are both supposed to add a mile or two in fuel mileage. The tuner claims to add 45 hp. The intake is supposed to give a small gain in horsepower. The tuner is in-line, and does not flash the ECM.

Banks is supposed to be coming out with a tuner, also. I think it will probably be a little pricier.

In the end, the way I looked at it was that I'd get a 75% (without mods) to 100% (with mods) increase in fuel mileage (I get 14.9 mpg in my F-150 with a 5.0 gasser) for a 10% increase in fuel cost. After the dealership's free oil changes for the new truck, the cost of maintenance (oil changes, DEF, etc.) isn't much more for the diesel if you DIY.

This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 10:11 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:06 pm to
There's been a whole lot of studies done by a whole lot of fleet operators on 3/4 tons. For those guys who sell to auction at 200k miles the cost ends up being a wash if you average out over many thousand vehicles. You pay more for the diesel, pay more for repairs, and recoup more at sale. The gasser is cheaper to buy, cheaper to repair, worthless at sale.

On any two particular vehicles the diesel comes out far ahead *IF* it has no failures. If it does have a major failure (HPFP for example) you'll pay 10k to fix it and lose your arse.

So moral of the story is take very good care of your diesel. Odds are itll last longer than your desire to own it. There is always some element of a dice role with a common rail diesel engine though that doesn't exist with a port injected gas engine.

If money is the main concern, always observe what the fleet counts are buying. They have this figured out to the dime.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27301 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:24 pm to
All true.

And maybe I just want to be different this go around. Same reason I bought a 375 H&H.

Also, I forgot to mention: GM is having injector problems with the 5.3's* and 6.2's right now. That makes the 3.0 even more appealing.

*You can't get the 5.3 in the refreshed 2022 AT4, anyway.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 11:27 pm
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

You can't get the 5.3 in the refreshed 2022 AT4,
say what? That's like saying you can't get ham in a ham and cheese sandwich.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram