- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/15/22 at 1:29 pm to CarRamrod
quote:Curiosity.
For what?
why do you care?
Posted on 2/15/22 at 1:48 pm to LSUfanNkaty
quote:
Non-existant market, as the 5.0 cummins proved.
It is hard to get anyone to pay that high of a premium for a diesel in a half ton. Like was said the market is not there, but a less expensive torque monster with "better fuel economy" is what there is a market for right now. If you truly need a 5L diesel, you truly need more than a 1/2 ton anyway.
I say "better fuel economy" bc unless you are trying to save the environment, you are not saving $$$$ going with the diesel.
The price of the motor option and the maintenance will be a wash when compared to any gas engine of today. (I have driven a 3/4 ton diesel for over 25 years, so I am not bashing them.)
Unless you are a hot shot, farm, construction, OTR, or have money the close to $9000 premium for the diesel on a 3/4 ton can buy a lot of fuel, add on DEF, and the eventual cleaning or replacement of the DPF and it gets even worse. The govt f'd up the advantages of having a car/truck diesel around 2005. They are now well on their way to f'ing up the advantages in farm/industrial equipment.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 2:06 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:holy exaggeration batman!
What do you want? A 6 liter diesel making 1000 ft-lbs of torque in a half ton truck with 7 tons of towing capacity and a 10 speed transmission that runs 12's and gets 40mpg?
Posted on 2/15/22 at 4:40 pm to CarRamrod
Well you've only given a Ricky Bobby answer to what you want so I'm genuinely curious what would tickle your pickle in this market segment. The "heavy half" thing was attempted by Nissan and the market has proven it won't support a premium price for non-premium fuel economy in a half ton truck. The people who want/need power are buying big trucks. The people who want fuel economy and moderate capability are buying half tons. You seem to be in some kind of really weird middle ground where the 14k lbs or whatever these trucks can tow isn't enough, the 400+ ft-lbs they put out isn't enough, but an HD truck is too big.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 5:55 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
The 7.3 powerstroke made 250 hp in 2001
I had a 2001. A $300 tuner added 150hp with the off road setting. Plus exhaust. Noisy thing compared to my new 6.7 but the old truck felt about as strong.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 6:10 pm to DownSouthJukin
Bow does the 3.0 compare with the 5.3 in towing capacity?
How about with that tuner and intake? I am intrigued.
How about with that tuner and intake? I am intrigued.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 8:59 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:aren't the car companies required to get to an avg of 40mpg in a few years anyway? They can't start rolling out guzzlers
for non-premium fuel economy in a half ton truck
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:07 pm to GREENHEAD22
3.0 diesel = 9500lbs 23/33 mpg (277hp and 460lb tq)
5.3 = 11500lbs 14/21mpg (355hp and 383tq)
I'm not sure why the diesel isn't rated higher with so much more torque. Guessing engine weight?
5.3 = 11500lbs 14/21mpg (355hp and 383tq)
I'm not sure why the diesel isn't rated higher with so much more torque. Guessing engine weight?
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:14 pm to SportTiger1
Engine weight and associated other stuff (transmission, etc) knock it down some. I doubt its 2000 lbs of extra shite though. They likely have shallower gear ratios to hit those fuel economy numbers.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:18 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
That makes sense. You would think the goal for them would be a comparable towing cap. But I guess that mpg mandate is more pressing
Fyi - ram diesel has the same towing cap (12750lbs) as the hemi...with the same mpg as chevy. So they figured it out.
Fyi - ram diesel has the same towing cap (12750lbs) as the hemi...with the same mpg as chevy. So they figured it out.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:22 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
The 2022 are rated for 13300 for certain models. Add tge mods and you can get equivalent HP. Looks like I may be looking at GM again instead of Ford for my next truck.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:26 pm to GREENHEAD22
Looks like that 13300 is for the 6.2
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:31 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:well......I do drive a raptor. Is that middle ground?
You seem to be in some kind of really weird middle ground
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:45 pm to CarRamrod
Ahhh. It all makes sense now
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:47 pm to GREENHEAD22
Dude don't buy any new diesel planning to mod it, especially not these small ones. Itll have more power than you can use as is, and a warranty.
I really don't care for the belt drive oil pump on the duramax, but I think it's made into a bigger deal than it really is. You can't have a full gear drive setup without making noise and im sure there were strict noise requirements.
I really don't care for the belt drive oil pump on the duramax, but I think it's made into a bigger deal than it really is. You can't have a full gear drive setup without making noise and im sure there were strict noise requirements.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:56 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:
Bow does the 3.0 compare with the 5.3 in towing capacity?
In the new 2022 models, the 3.0 is rated at 13,000 lbs (4x4) and the 5.3 is rated 11,000 (4x4).
The only gear option given was 3.23. Maybe that will change in the future. I would have gotten a 3.55 if it was available.
quote:
How about with that tuner and intake? I am intrigued.
I was looking at S&B cold air intake ($349) and an Ag/Diesel Solutions tuner ($445). They are both supposed to add a mile or two in fuel mileage. The tuner claims to add 45 hp. The intake is supposed to give a small gain in horsepower. The tuner is in-line, and does not flash the ECM.
Banks is supposed to be coming out with a tuner, also. I think it will probably be a little pricier.
In the end, the way I looked at it was that I'd get a 75% (without mods) to 100% (with mods) increase in fuel mileage (I get 14.9 mpg in my F-150 with a 5.0 gasser) for a 10% increase in fuel cost. After the dealership's free oil changes for the new truck, the cost of maintenance (oil changes, DEF, etc.) isn't much more for the diesel if you DIY.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:06 pm to DownSouthJukin
There's been a whole lot of studies done by a whole lot of fleet operators on 3/4 tons. For those guys who sell to auction at 200k miles the cost ends up being a wash if you average out over many thousand vehicles. You pay more for the diesel, pay more for repairs, and recoup more at sale. The gasser is cheaper to buy, cheaper to repair, worthless at sale.
On any two particular vehicles the diesel comes out far ahead *IF* it has no failures. If it does have a major failure (HPFP for example) you'll pay 10k to fix it and lose your arse.
So moral of the story is take very good care of your diesel. Odds are itll last longer than your desire to own it. There is always some element of a dice role with a common rail diesel engine though that doesn't exist with a port injected gas engine.
If money is the main concern, always observe what the fleet counts are buying. They have this figured out to the dime.
On any two particular vehicles the diesel comes out far ahead *IF* it has no failures. If it does have a major failure (HPFP for example) you'll pay 10k to fix it and lose your arse.
So moral of the story is take very good care of your diesel. Odds are itll last longer than your desire to own it. There is always some element of a dice role with a common rail diesel engine though that doesn't exist with a port injected gas engine.
If money is the main concern, always observe what the fleet counts are buying. They have this figured out to the dime.
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:24 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
All true.
And maybe I just want to be different this go around. Same reason I bought a 375 H&H.
Also, I forgot to mention: GM is having injector problems with the 5.3's* and 6.2's right now. That makes the 3.0 even more appealing.
*You can't get the 5.3 in the refreshed 2022 AT4, anyway.
And maybe I just want to be different this go around. Same reason I bought a 375 H&H.
Also, I forgot to mention: GM is having injector problems with the 5.3's* and 6.2's right now. That makes the 3.0 even more appealing.
*You can't get the 5.3 in the refreshed 2022 AT4, anyway.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:58 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:say what? That's like saying you can't get ham in a ham and cheese sandwich.
You can't get the 5.3 in the refreshed 2022 AT4,
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News