- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/29/21 at 12:59 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
You guys will inject something you buy at the Tractor Supply store but wont take a vaccine.
To be fair, you wouldn’t inject the livestock version. You would I eat it and I’ve heard it is a delightful apple flavor. Secondly, why would you even need to use the animal version if you can easily get a prescription for it.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:00 pm to CrimsonFever
quote:
You guys will inject something you buy at the Tractor Supply store but wont take a vaccine.
To be fair, the stuff at the Tractor Supply has seen a whole lot more vetting than the vaccines.
That isn't debatable at all. Unless you're Powerman, anyway.
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:04 pm to LegendInMyMind
I’ll say this, if you are using Ivermectin as a preventative out of fear of getting Covid for an extended period of time then I think you should just go ahead and get the vaccine.
Taking that stuff for a year I think would be problematic. Taking it for a few days when symptoms start up is really nothing to be concerned with if your are concerned about issues bc of taking ivermectin.
Taking that stuff for a year I think would be problematic. Taking it for a few days when symptoms start up is really nothing to be concerned with if your are concerned about issues bc of taking ivermectin.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:05 pm to BRUNNIN4
quote:
Pfizer tweeted yesterday that they are developing a new antiviral to pair with their vaccine. This gravy train won't ever stop.
of all the pharmaceutical companies out there to bash, and list includes most of them, Pfizer is one of the few that actually does a good job and doesn't artificially inflate drug prices.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:06 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:07 pm to BRUNNIN4
quote:
This gravy train won't ever stop.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:07 pm to Bmath
quote:
There is little evidence that Ivermectin does anything.
Which is why it doesn't make sense why two economists who wrote the article in the OP would have such an opinion as to Ivermectin being effective.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:07 pm to Powerman
quote:
LOL but you won't take the vaccine because the FDA hasn't given it full use authorization right? ?
You realize you're comparing this to ivermectin, which has been through rigorous FDA processes and ised for decades... right?
You're proving the very point you lambast, idiot
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:07 pm to GumboPot
There are only about 400k Americans that have died of Covid since that was published.
How many might have been saved. Why are relatives of those folks not stringing some of these information suppressors up?
How many might have been saved. Why are relatives of those folks not stringing some of these information suppressors up?
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:08 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
That isn't debatable at all.
If you mean it isn't debatable because it's such a ridiculously asinine statement that it isn't even worth the time, money, or education it would take to get you to a level where you understand basic logic in a mediocre way. Then yes you are correct
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:10 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
You realize you're comparing this to ivermectin, which has been through rigorous FDA processes and ised for decades... right?
No, he doesn't realize that. He still believes it is a "valid point".
All I'm saying is that his "You will put this drug that has a half century of data into your body but you won't take this brand new, experimental unapproved vaccine that has less than a year of data in your body?" is complete and total bullshite. It is a disingenuous non-starter to the debate Powerman is trying to have.
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:11 pm to phunkatron
quote:
I'm surprised any pharmacy would accept a script for a toxic drug
hyperbole much?
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:11 pm to STEVED00
quote:
I’ll say this, if you are using Ivermectin as a preventative out of fear of getting Covid for an extended period of time then I think you should just go ahead and get the vaccine.
Taking that stuff for a year I think would be problematic. Taking it for a few days when symptoms start up is really nothing to be concerned with if your are concerned about issues bc of taking ivermectin.
In a general sense I agree with this 100%. However the main problem with this entire COVID communications debacle is treatment specifics for the same disease is different for all people. Some people are very healthy and have very high risk tolerance. Some people are on the verge of dying and very low risk tolerance. Thus, treatment plans should vary accordingly.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:12 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
If you mean it isn't debatable because it's such a ridiculously asinine statement that it isn't even worth the time, money, or education it would take to get you to a level where you understand basic logic in a mediocre way. Then yes you are correct
Sorry, you didn't refute anything I said. You typed alot, though. So, good job on that, I guess.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:14 pm to GumboPot
Because companies who spend billions to get a new drug to market hate someone who uses an existing one which has had its patent expire.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:15 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You typed alot, though
lol that text could fit in a tweet
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:15 pm to GumboPot
quote:
However the main problem with this entire COVID communications debacle is treatment specifics for the same disease is different for all people. Some people are very healthy and have very high risk tolerance. Some people are on the verge of dying and very low risk tolerance. Thus, treatment plans should vary accordingly.
One thing to consider in these drug trials is that
1) They typically only test patients at a very specific point in the infection. So only patients that were recently exposed or perhaps only patients that have sever symptoms.
2) Treatment in these trials follow standard of care protocols. There is no individualized treatment based on other factors.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:16 pm to ell_13
quote:
It’s not an opinion article.
lmfao yes it is
quote:
Also:
Mr. Henderson, a research fellow with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, was senior health economist with President Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers. Mr. Hooper is president of Objective Insights, a firm that consults with pharmaceutical clients.
Who gives af? Are we taking medical advice from economists now?
This post was edited on 7/29/21 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 7/29/21 at 1:17 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
lol that text could fit in a tweet
You still said absolutely nothing.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News