
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ: Flock Camera repeals are being opposed by a surprising group: black folk
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:06 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I mean…not all black people like crime, even if done by other black people. Is this article insinuating they do?
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
May have been the two easiest to pay off
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:22 pm to Addison Tiger
Flock cameras are dramatically lowering crime
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The OP is a troll that’s hired by Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk to promote every hideous Big Tech thing imaginable.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
We have license readers in all 5 exits and entrances to Sherwood Forest Neighborhood. That and being a crime district with neighborhood watch has reduced crimes significantly according to the police. The areas surrounding the neighborhood doesn’t have that and theft is much higher. I’m ok with flocking cameras, just punish the cops abusing them for personal reasons.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Flock cameras are dramatically lowering crime
Crime is reducing in large part to the reduction in alcohol consumption.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:31 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Kinda my point?
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Then out them only in those public housing areas and only facing inward. Take them out of regular public domain. Would those two support that?
Or better yet, police use good ole detective work. And increase police dept while getting rid of flock.
Or better yet, police use good ole detective work. And increase police dept while getting rid of flock.
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:52 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
2 black people on a city council in an unspecified city = all black people?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 4:53 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Well shite. Now I guess I need to completely reevaluate my stance on flock cameras.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:14 am to Cycledude
Why don’t they make the software so that flock cameras can’t be accessed by any one person alone? Like accessing a room where two people need keys.
That way you’re much less likely to get some random creep officer spying one a love interest or whatever.
That way you’re much less likely to get some random creep officer spying one a love interest or whatever.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:36 am to Cycledude
I seem to recall a quote regarding the trading of liberty for protection.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:47 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Oh so now they’re worried about crime?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:20 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
the Council's two Black members, said their constituents in public housing worry about crime.
Yet when they personally witness a crime they won’t “snitch”.

Popular
Back to top

8











