Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

WSJ: Flock Camera repeals are being opposed by a surprising group: black folk

Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74944 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Addison Tiger
Antwerp, Belgium
Member since Jul 2005
827 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:06 pm to
I mean…not all black people like crime, even if done by other black people. Is this article insinuating they do?
Posted by PotatoChip
Member since May 2014
5394 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:10 pm to
May have been the two easiest to pay off
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74944 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:22 pm to
Flock cameras are dramatically lowering crime

Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
4206 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:27 pm to
The OP is a troll that’s hired by Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk to promote every hideous Big Tech thing imaginable.
Posted by Cycledude
Member since Jul 2018
2476 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 9:29 pm to
We have license readers in all 5 exits and entrances to Sherwood Forest Neighborhood. That and being a crime district with neighborhood watch has reduced crimes significantly according to the police. The areas surrounding the neighborhood doesn’t have that and theft is much higher. I’m ok with flocking cameras, just punish the cops abusing them for personal reasons.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
21591 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Flock cameras are dramatically lowering crime


Crime is reducing in large part to the reduction in alcohol consumption.
Posted by Addison Tiger
Antwerp, Belgium
Member since Jul 2005
827 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:31 pm to
Kinda my point?
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
34385 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:34 pm to
Then out them only in those public housing areas and only facing inward. Take them out of regular public domain. Would those two support that?

Or better yet, police use good ole detective work. And increase police dept while getting rid of flock.
Posted by Gnash
KTX
Member since Oct 2015
11832 posts
Posted on 9/17/26 at 10:52 pm to
2 black people on a city council in an unspecified city = all black people?
Posted by lazlodawg
Member since Sep 2017
686 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 4:53 am to
Well shite. Now I guess I need to completely reevaluate my stance on flock cameras.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28151 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:14 am to
Why don’t they make the software so that flock cameras can’t be accessed by any one person alone? Like accessing a room where two people need keys.

That way you’re much less likely to get some random creep officer spying one a love interest or whatever.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
73107 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:36 am to
I seem to recall a quote regarding the trading of liberty for protection.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
16390 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 6:47 am to
Oh so now they’re worried about crime?
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37950 posts
Posted on 9/18/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

the Council's two Black members, said their constituents in public housing worry about crime.


Yet when they personally witness a crime they won’t “snitch”.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram