Started By
Message

re: World Trade Center 7 concluded “not destroyed by fire”

Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by OscarTheGrouch
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
6004 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88346 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179931 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

World Trade Center 7


diesel fuel tanks
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:14 pm to
I guess that smoke coming out the building is just an illusion..?
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10476 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:14 pm to


Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse


Correct.

But two skyscrapers falling next to it and critically damaging it before it caught on fire should could.

They said they would've had to demolish it anyway because of the damage sustained by the twins falling.

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80850 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:16 pm to
You're a kook too? Interesting.
Posted by monstranceclock76
Texas
Member since Jul 2019
932 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

World Trade Center 7 concluded “not destroyed by fire


Does anyone actually believe fire brought it down?
Posted by monstranceclock76
Texas
Member since Jul 2019
932 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

But two skyscrapers falling next to it and critically damaging it before it caught on fire should could.


If that were the case, then every other building around WTC 1 & 2 should have fallen....they did not.
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4950 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:22 pm to
So bc two skyscrapers next to it fell vertically then it should have made another building that wasn’t touched and on fire from who knows what fall vertically as well... got it.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50960 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

ABSTRACT

Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center

By

J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E.,University of Alaska Fairbanks

And

Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation

And

Feng Xiao, Ph.D.,Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering


So. we're trusting China on this one or nah?
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

But two skyscrapers falling next to it and critically damaging it before it caught on fire should could.


Yep...!

Yeah I'm sure when the twin towers fell, the ground didn't shake at all and the building's structure wasn't compromised at all...

Ever stand near where a tree is cut down? The ground fricking shakes all around you...
Posted by MojoGuyPan
Intercession City, Florida
Member since Jun 2018
2797 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

WTC 7 was heavily damaged by collapsing debris from WTC 1 and WTC 2. The fires weakened the already weakened state of the building even further and this led to the collapse of the building.



Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4950 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:24 pm to
Oh ok, so trees fall vertically during earthquakes now too?
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

If that were the case, then every other building around WTC 1 & 2 should have fallen....they did not.


Not necessarily...

Depends on what the after shock did to those buildings around it..

Maybe Tower 7's was constructed differently and didn't tolerate it...
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Oh ok, so trees fall vertically during earthquakes now too?




You would be a fool if you didn't believe 2 110 story, 1350 foot buildings coning down vertically didn't have a major quake effect on that building...

and that's not what I said dip shite...
This post was edited on 4/2/20 at 3:34 pm
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4950 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:33 pm to
And you would be a bigger fool to believe that 3 buildings fell vertically from melted beams failing simultaneously.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

And you would be a bigger fool to believe that 3 buildings fell vertically from melted beams failing simultaneously.


I guess the moon landing was fake as well...

I found ol Shep...

This post was edited on 4/2/20 at 3:40 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28117 posts
Posted on 4/2/20 at 3:38 pm to
lol, UAF is University of Alaska - Fairbanks

The professor who conducted this study is a long-time 9/11 truther.

No rational person should take this seriously.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram