- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:21 pm to SuperSaint
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:21 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
but it's possible noticing it more because my opinion has been called ignorant several times by the WS camp
You don't know the law, and you think Hayes should walk absolutely free after all the evidence presented. How else would you characterize that?
Would you prefer it be sugarcoated?
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:21 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:honest question, what's the law if someone is threatening to you and you actually fear for your life, if you defend yourself you have to have evidence somehow showing that you were actually scared for your life? What if you drop a deuce in your drawz? Would that be evidence enough?
So as long as he feels he was scared he can kill a man that no evidence has shown was a threat to him? No, I don't think that should be possible
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:22 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Personally I think he's guilty but it's gonna e hard to get the jury to convict... 10 out of 12 seems tough in a hazy case like this
Well, this board seems pretty well evenly split.....
Based on that he should walk due to hung jury.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:22 pm to SuperSaint
The standard is "reasonable" SS. Even if you feel it, if it's not deemed reasonable, then you're guilty.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:23 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
honest question, what's the law if someone is threatening to you and you actually fear for your life, if you defend yourself you have to have evidence somehow showing that you were actually scared for your life? What if you drop a deuce in your drawz? Would that be evidence enough?
If you don't have reasonable fear, i.e. fear that can be shown to be reasonable to others, you're not justified. It's not a hard concept.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:23 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:awe man Mr LNCH, 4 days ago you were spouting off all kinds of shite garbage but now after reading a couple statues you're ready to take the bar exam huh?
You don't know the law,
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:24 pm to SuperSaint
You yourself admit you don't even know the charge Hayes is facing. But yea, attack me.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:24 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
honest question, what's the law if someone is threatening to you and you actually fear for your life, if you defend yourself you have to have evidence somehow showing that you were actually scared for your life?
You have to convince at least 3 of 12 that your "fear of death or great bodily harm" was reasonable.
To me, that would require corroborating evidence. I guess each person interprets that differently.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:24 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:did you even read my post you quoted?
If you don't have reasonable fear, i.e. fear that can be shown to be reasonable to others, you're not justified. It's not a hard concept.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:26 pm to SuperSaint
No, I don't assume that just because you have fear that anyone else finds it reasonable.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:27 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
I think one would assume fear for life is reasonable enough right
Absolutely not. People fire through doors at noises all the time. If they kill the milkman, was that reasonable?
ETA: Maybe and maybe not, depends on the circumstances.
This post was edited on 12/11/16 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:27 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:please don't be so obtuse, I'm seriously just trying to have a discussion I don't want to be in the back and forth bickering bullshite that you end up in in a lot of the threads you enter. Go find someone else for that.
You yourself admit you don't even know the charge Hayes is facing. But yea, attack me.
And yes I know exactly what charges he is facing. Where did I admit that I don't? Serious question
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:27 pm to LNCHBOX
I don't know that I think he should walk, but a part of me hopes he does.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:29 pm to SuperSaint
You keep saying stone cold killer. That's not what Hayes is charged as being.
You say you aren't interested in the back and forth, yet you won't even educate yourself at all. And then you just talk shite to me when I correctly call your uninformed opinion that Hayes should walk free ignorant. Hayes should walk free based on the evidence presented. You seem to be the only person that doesn't agree with that.
You say you aren't interested in the back and forth, yet you won't even educate yourself at all. And then you just talk shite to me when I correctly call your uninformed opinion that Hayes should walk free ignorant. Hayes should walk free based on the evidence presented. You seem to be the only person that doesn't agree with that.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:30 pm to Janky
I hate that this happened. I truly do for everyone involved. I'm no lawyer but it seems that CHs lawyer didn't do a great job ... why would he let his client lie (if he did) on the stand?? Evidence (assuming it wasn't tampered with) shows that there was ONE GUN, right???
Also, I really just want at the end of the day for the man to get a fair trial. And despite it being a former Saints player that was killed, how in the hell does a juror remember EVERYTHING without taking notes?? That alone to me makes nothing a fair trial.
Am I crazy??
Also, I really just want at the end of the day for the man to get a fair trial. And despite it being a former Saints player that was killed, how in the hell does a juror remember EVERYTHING without taking notes?? That alone to me makes nothing a fair trial.
Am I crazy??
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:32 pm to tiger91
You don't get a fair trial when you kill a saints player IN New Orleans. The man was guilty by public opinion the minute he was arrested.
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:33 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
honest question, what's the law if someone is threatening to you (by physically making contact with you while someone is trying to hold them back and tell them to stop and then turning around and reaching for a gun) and you actually fear for your life, if you defend yourself you have to have evidence somehow showing that you were actually scared for your life? What if you drop a deuce in your drawz? Would that be evidence enough?
Fixed it to make it where I guess a reaonable person would possibly fear for ones life, but not sure what everyone feels is reasonable
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:34 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:thanks for being reasonable
Sid in Lakeshore
Posted on 12/11/16 at 6:35 pm to SuperSaint
That's not what happens here. Nothing has shown Hayes to have any reasonable fear for his life. Certainly not from Smith. Had he shot Hernandez, there could be an argument. But the Smiths are who ended up shot and killed.
Popular
Back to top


1





