- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will Mudberg Cause Levees and ORCS to Fail?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 5/27/26 at 12:58 pm
Kelly Williams penned this column. He is the retired President of Mississippi Chemical.
quote:
CEOs of petrochemical plants and refineries on the lower Mississippi River may make Buffett’s omission mistake — and stop the river from flowing by their plants. It will hurt.
The river tried to change course to the Atchafalaya in 1973. It almost did. The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) stopped it. The Atchafalaya is a shorter, steeper route to the Gulf near Morgan City. Gravity makes the river find a shorter, steeper course every 1,000 years or so when the old course silts in. The old course by Baton Rouge and New Orleans has silted in. A course change is inevitable. It will leave plants and refineries stranded on a saltwater estuary.
In 1973, I was CEO of a public company with fertilizer plants on the river below Baton Rouge. They depended on river transportation and water. The Corps kept the river flowing for them and others. I was blissfully ignorant that it could stop flowing. I learned that it can and that it can be delayed. This explains why it will change course and how to delay it.
In 1928, Congress put the Corps in charge of the river to prevent another 1927 flood disaster. The Corps raised levees to contain floods, straightened and shortened the river to speed floods to the sea, built dams and reservoirs to catch and slowly release rain and snowmelt, and built other flood control structures.
One of those structures discharges part of the Mississippi’s flow to Atchafalaya and thence swiftly to the Gulf to keep the rest meandering by New Orleans. It’s the Old River Control Complex (ORCC) just below the Mississippi-Louisiana state line. It began operating in 1963, was repaired and expanded after the 1973 flood, and worked as designed for 27 years.
Then in 1990, the Corps compromised its flood control mission and changed the way it operated the ORCC to favor a small, privately owned hydroelectric plant. That change caused sediments to fall out, clog the river, and create a bottleneck (Mudberg) just below the ORCC. Mudberg grew, slowed the river’s flow to the sea, and made floods higher and longer. By 2015, it had reduced flood flow discharge by 23%. That decrease and an 8% increase in rainfall made floods from Natchez to Greenville over twice as long in the five years after 2015 vs. before. They destroyed much of the bottomland hardwood ecosystem on a million acres inside the levees.
n 2018, some 45 years after the Corps saved my company’s plants, I learned that its longer, higher floods had taken farm ground and impaired the value of my property on the river just above the ORCC. My education began after the freak 2016 winter flood that closed the deer season along the river. That flood deposited sand dunes on my land that caused permanent damage. Earlier floods had caused no lasting damage.
I realized something had changed, but didn’t know what. I had heard of the Morganza Spillway and thought the Corps could open it and shorten floods. I was wrong. I learned that the Mississippi River Commission (MRC) supervises the Corps and holds semiannual forums for landowners to ask questions. I testified four times in 2016–17 and asked why flooding was worse. The Generals said it was more rain. They didn’t mention Mudberg.
Then in late 2017, LSU’s Dr. Y. Jun Xu presented a paper that explained why flooding was worse — and that the river could change course in a big flood. His paper was based on Corps data. It was no surprise to the Corps. But it was to me. It said Mudberg caused flooding to be worse. Corps sedimentation studies in 2015–16 confirmed this. They also predicted its bottleneck effects will get worse until the Corps restores the operation of the ORCC as designed. In 2019, this information led the State of Mississippi and over 500 landowners in the batture (including me) to sue the U.S. Government seeking just compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The case is pending trial on the merits. The Federal Court of Claims moves slowly.
Mother Nature didn’t wait. The 2019–21 cluster of long floods completed the destruction of most of the bottomland hardwood ecosystem inside the levees and doomed the rest. The 2019 flood was above flood stage for 162 days at Vicksburg — the longest since the Great Flood of 1927. The Yazoo basin was flooded 219 consecutive days. I asked the Commanding MRC General earlier this year if the Corps would dredge Mudberg. Crickets. She may be waiting on orders.
In 2016, the Commanding General told me he couldn’t increase the Mississippi’s discharge to the Atchafalaya at the ORCC because: “That’s above my pay grade — Congress set the discharge rate. I follow orders. You’ll have to get Congress to change them.” This is to get Congress to order the Corps to dredge Mudberg.
That will cost billions. But it will delay trillions in cost to repair course change damage and develop the new route to the sea, and in the opportunity cost of lost river commerce while the new route develops. The new route will cut highways, pipelines, transmission lines, railroads, and other critical infrastructure affecting national security. Dredging Mudberg is cheap insurance.
There are over 150 petrochemical plants, industrial facilities, and refineries (about 18% of the country’s capacity) below Baton Rouge. Their CEOs can help get Congress to pay the premium. Landowners wish they would. They may wish they had.
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:02 pm to prplhze2000
at the end of the day, nature always wins
we're just along for the ride
we're just along for the ride
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:06 pm to prplhze2000
The ORCS is going to fail eventually anyway. It is made of concrete and steel, and it is trying to hold back the most powerful river in the world. It is already showing signs of aging.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:09 pm to prplhze2000
Seems it inevitable either way, it will change course at some point.
Biloxi and east would immediately be pristine clean beaches!!
BRB, calling a realtor there
Biloxi and east would immediately be pristine clean beaches!!
BRB, calling a realtor there
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:09 pm to prplhze2000
What hydroelectric plant is he talking about? Big Cajun? Because I don’t think that’s hydro.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:10 pm to prplhze2000
what is actually keeping them from dredging it?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:16 pm to prplhze2000
When I think of Government, I think of efficiency, integrity and competency. With the thousands of miles of levees, surely, nothing will go wrong.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:23 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
What hydroelectric plant is he talking about? Big Cajun? Because I don’t think that’s hydro.
I assume he’s referring to the Sidney Murray hydroelectric station
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:26 pm to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
I assume he’s referring to the Sidney Murray hydroelectric station
How does something that far north cause silting in one specific spot that far downstream?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:28 pm to Traffic Circle
Their is a small hydroelectric plant on a canal between the Mississippi and the Atchafalaya rivers. You would not know it was there unless you were looking for it.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:28 pm to upgrayedd
No idea. The study didn’t verify his claim that the hydroelectric plant is causing the mudberg only verifies it exists
Posted on 5/27/26 at 1:33 pm to crazyLSUstudent
Also unsure of how the mudberg and extended flooding periods are related
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:08 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
How does something that far north cause silting in one specific spot that far downstream?
The way I understand it (which could be wrong), is that the inlet was designed to minimize sediment going towards the dam/turbines. It forces the sediment to stay in the river and bypass ORCC, and then drop out as the river slows downstream of ORCC. Prior to the construction of Sidney Murray, ORCC took it's fair share of sediment, but since 1990 it is taking the same amount of water but less sediment. For round numbers, if ORCC takes 30% of the water, it should take an equivalent portion of the sediment. It still takes 30% of the water, but say only 20% of the sediment. That additional 10% of sediment is what's piling up in the "mudberg."
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:13 pm to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
Also unsure of how the mudberg and extended flooding periods are related
The increased sediment dropping out would in theory lessen the the channel cross section, thus reducing flow and causing a backup that extends upstream.
Found some more info. Trying to find the eaxact report and not a summary:
quote:
The new research finds sediment has caused the river floor downstream of the floodgate to elevate and the sandbars to grow in volume by more than 200 percent. At least 36 million metric tons (over 39 million short tons) of coarse sand has been added to the river and narrowed the river channel by 800 meters (half a mile), according to hydrologist Yi-Jun Xu from Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, who will present the new findings today at the 2017 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting. Xu’s previous research found these sandbars could swell even larger in the near future, as sand has also accumulated upstream from the control structure and could wash downstream under the right conditions.
These changes diminish the river’s capacity to carry water on its current course. When sections of the river’s floor rise to a sufficient point, a sudden increase in flow — perhaps from a flood — could drive the Mississippi River to overwhelm the control structure and adopt a new path, potentially causing the Mississippi to be captured by the Atchafalaya, according to the new research.
Xu believes enough sediment has already accumulated in the area to pose a risk. Another recent study also suggests that by the 2090s, changes in temperature and precipitation could increase the Mississippi River’s flow by nearly 60 percent, increasing the likelihood of frequent and large floods. Rapid urbanization of the area, too, boosts chances of flooding, as paved surfaces deprive the land of its ability to store and slowly release water.
“When a mega flood comes, it will overpower the Old River Control Structure, if the river floor elevation continues,” Xu said.
Source
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:31 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:The Mississippi River has NOTHING to do with the clarity of water and beaches in Biloxi and to the east (other then when there is a Bonnet Carre Spillway opening).
Biloxi and east would immediately be pristine clean beaches!!
The closest Mississippi River pass to the Mississippi Gulf coast (Main Pass) is roughly 70 miles south of the mainland beaches. And the prevailing currents along the northern gulf are east to west.
If the Mississippi River had ANYTHING to do with the Mississippi Gulf Coast water clarity, Ship and Horn Islands' waters would be muddier than the Biloxi and Gulfport beaches, instead of looking like this:
Mississippi Sound's clarity issues come from the rivers that outfall into it-- mainly the Pearl River, Pascagoula, and Mobile Rivers, and to a lesser degree the Jourdan, Wolf, Biloxi, and Tchoutacabuffa Rivers.
NOT the Mississippi River.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:49 pm to BRich
quote:
NOT the Mississippi River.
Except for those times Bonnet Carre is open.
Popular
Back to top
6









