Started By
Message

re: Will bands ever make a comeback?

Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:16 am to
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
60167 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Pretty cool to have a team member among us!


We absolutely have team members among us….current as well as former team members from a number of sports…
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 1:04 pm to
I'm not a fan, because I like Rock. TW is a great pop music star, she's a great performer and her music is good pop music.
Posted by YNWA
Member since Nov 2015
7133 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 1:26 pm to
There's a lot of bands out there. You just probably haven't heard of them yet. Go watch European music festivals like Glastonbury and dozens more. You may find something you like. America has been taken over by country pop music. It's where the $ is right now unfortunately.
Posted by CovingtonCrooner
Covington (future capital of LA)
Member since Aug 2025
27 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 7:24 pm to
An Australian band - King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard - is absolute tearing up live shows right now. They sell out 5k-10k venues all across the country and rocks out for 2-3 hours straight. Silly name, epic rock show ??
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
8528 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 8:02 pm to
Go spend 8 hours in a scrip club... You won't hear a rock song ever... EVER...
Posted by tigertrueAU
Canyon Lake Texas
Member since Oct 2009
1286 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

we’re gonna beat your fricking arse Saturday


that didn’t age well
Posted by lsugorilla
PNW
Member since Sep 2009
6361 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

not let radio, etc. dictate your tastes.


Coming here to post this.

There are 6 fantastic independent radios stations in town here.
And that is not counting the online only radio stations in town here.

The generic national radio stations are terrible.

But it’s just a button push away to find an independent radio station that doesn’t play the same 0soumgs on repeat
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
30951 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

I don’t know but we’re gonna beat your fricking arse Saturday.


Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
14774 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

I don’t know but we’re gonna beat your fricking arse Saturday.

Shooter’s shoot. Sometimes they miss.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10139 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

there are more great bands right now than there have been in the last 20 years.


Would you be willing to name some?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10139 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

There’s plenty of bands out there doing original rock music. The issue for me is it just doesn’t stand out. We’ve heard it all before. There just aren’t new sounds and styles really. It’s just all really similar. If your big on lyrics, that’s helps, but I’m listening for the tune first.

None of this to say the music is bad or the artists aren’t talented, it just doesn’t feel new and exciting. It doesn’t get its grips into me. I think a lot of people feel the same way.


This is the correct answer, and if I remember correctly you are a musician yourself. And if I do remember that correctly, that makes sense to me as to why you get it.

Rock has gone as far as it can go. It doesn't feel new or exciting because it's not. It may be well-done, but that's not the same thing as being new/exciting/revolutionary.

Art is supposed to reflect what's going on in society and culture. When a "new" band today is making art that is indistinguishable in style and form from art that was being made 40 or 50 or 60 years ago, either the art form has stagnated, the culture has stagnated, or both.

At least in today's world, where culture evolves at the speed of decades (or maybe now with the internet, maybe half-decades) instead of centuries or half-centuries like it did 400 years ago.

Music in the 70s reflected the societal culture of the 70s. All "new" music reflects now is a lack of a unique culture in 2025 and/or (for us older people) nostalgia for the culture of the 60s/70s/80s/whatever.

And I guess the fact that so many people don't get that is actually a part of the lack of cultural identity in modernity. We would no more have listened to music that was decades old when I was growing up than we would have packed mud in our ears. That would have represented our parents' music to us, which we would have rejected on principle.

But I think even that association of music and culture has been totally lost today. I was born in 1970, so my teenage years were during the 80s. It said something about you whether you went to school wearing an REM t-shirt vs a Metallica t-shirt vs a Prince t-shirt. It said something about your values and personality. I think that's gone in today's society.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
82743 posts
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

I don’t know but we’re gonna beat your fricking arse Saturday.


Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37320 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 1:16 am to
quote:

Would you be willing to name some?
I’m going to pass on listing bands. Whether you personally like or dislike them has no bearing on my point. I’m not claiming wackatimesthree will enjoy them.

No offense, but I’ve been in a number of threads on this topic, and every time someone provides band names the discussion immediately derails into nitpicking those bands. That misses the point entirely.

The point is that they exist.

Music discovery has evolved from traditional radio/TV to streaming platforms, YouTube, and social media. New music is readily available for those who are curious. If you need me to provide specific examples, it suggests you’re content with your current music choices and haven’t felt compelled to explore further. Which is perfectly fine. Enjoy your REO Speedwagon or whatever you’re into.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42200 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 1:29 am to
quote:

. I think that's gone in today's society.




Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10139 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 6:30 am to
quote:

I’m going to pass on listing bands.


That's what I thought.

quote:

I’m not claiming wackatimesthree will enjoy them.


No, that would be a subjective claim and one that would be impossible to make. You, on the other hand, are making a claim that is entirely objectively evaluated. You can't account for taste, you can analyze form and style. It's actually a pretty easy thing to do to point out, "That's just the same sort of chord progression that Pink Floyd favored during the 'Wish You Were Here' era," or "The Beatles resolved from the minor to the major of the same chord all the time," or "That guy is singing just like Robert Plant" or (for the a-hole below) "Zappa made a career out of dropping the 3rd and using Sus2 or Sus4 chords. It was his signature sound."

My claim is not that there are no new bands that you like. My claim is that there are no new bands doing anything...well...new.

quote:


The point is that they exist.


Nope.

The point is that this is you just SAYING they exist. I can say that a flying pink unicorn exists, but that doesn't make it so.

The fact that you won't post them is an indication that you know they don't fit the criteria, because I guess other people have told you that already.

But I, like you, have had this discussion online many, many times before, and I have never had someone who makes some version of the claim, "There are more great new bands out there than ever, you just have to know where to look," who actually posts a band who ends up being anything but a straight copy of bands (or stitched together elements of bands) from the 60s, 70s, 80s, or 90s.

I don't know why people won't just admit the truth. I guess it's either that people take pride in being the sort of person who can look into the right nooks and crannies of the internet to find these "cutting edge" bands (that aren't actually cutting edge at all), or they don't want to admit that their generation has no unique musical expression and has to rely on their parents' or (in some cases) grandparents' musical aesthetic instead of having one of their own. Or both.

But it's fine.

Carry on.
This post was edited on 9/28/25 at 6:39 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10139 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 6:31 am to
quote:

Zappas Stache


Well, now I'm a convinced Gen Xer.

Thanks for the thoughtful post.

EDIT: The irony is that all these great "new" bands really do sound like Boomers.
This post was edited on 9/28/25 at 6:36 am
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
9269 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 6:40 am to
King Gizzard
Goose

Probably best 2 "new" bands of the last...decade?
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37320 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:24 am to
quote:

No, that would be a subjective claim and one that would be impossible to make. You, on the other hand, are making a claim that is entirely objectively evaluated. You can't account for taste, you can analyze form and style. It's actually a pretty easy thing to do to point out, "That's just the same sort of chord progression that Pink Floyd favored during the 'Wish You Were Here' era," or "The Beatles resolved from the minor to the major of the same chord all the time," or "That guy is singing just like Robert Plant" or (for the a-hole below) "Zappa made a career out of dropping the 3rd and using Sus2 or Sus4 chords. It was his signature sound."

My claim is not that there are no new bands that you like. My claim is that there are no new bands doing anything...well...new.
You’re shifting the goalposts. My claim was never that modern bands are doing something no chord progression in history has ever touched before. My claim was that there are active bands with large audiences, millions of streams, and successful tours. That’s an objective fact.

You keep framing this as though the only way “good music” can exist is if someone reinvents the entire form of rock in a way completely divorced from its lineage. By that definition, almost no band in any decade qualifies. The Beatles took from Chuck Berry and Buddy Holly. Zeppelin straight-up lifted from blues artists yet I doubt you dismiss Zeppelin’s cultural impact just because their building blocks weren’t brand new.

And just so you don’t think I’m dodging, here are three current bands with global followings and sold-out shows: Idles, Viagra Boys, and Amyl and the Sniffers. I don’t expect you to like them. That’s subjective but their success is not. And if your next move is just nitpicking why each one “doesn’t count,” that’ll only prove the point I already made: the existence of thriving bands isn’t up for debate with you, only whether you personally choose to dismiss them.

All popular music has always been derivative. Rock borrowed from blues, blues borrowed from gospel and folk, punk recycled rock ’n’ roll, and hip-hop was built on sampling other people’s records. Derivation doesn’t mean stagnation.

Every generation’s music is derivative. Pretending yours wasn’t is just nostalgia talking.
This post was edited on 9/28/25 at 8:57 am
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17590 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:36 am to
I doubt a rock band will break into mainstream fame but there are some damn good ones out now. Most are NuMetal derivatives

Thousand Foot Krutch
Sleep Token
All Time Low
Bad Flower

A fun band with local support is The Bends
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31687 posts
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:39 am to
quote:

I don’t know but we’re gonna beat your fricking arse Saturday.


first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram