Started By
Message
locked post

Why are universities with strong athletic curricula, looked down upon by some....

Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:00 pm
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:00 pm
....while schools like Julliard are lauded?

Both specialize in teaching entertainers. Similar careers can lead to unbelievable wealth for the top few, and offer many moderate paying service jobs, while most end up pursuing other things. Both tap into Billion dollar industries.

I think you can compare the Football curriculum at schools like Alabama, LSU, and Ohio St. to the curricula at schools like Julliard.

This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:11 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80761 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:01 pm to
I knew you were a terrible poster.
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:01 pm to
What a dumb comment.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Football at schools like Alabama, LSU, and Ohio St.


thats like comparing LSU academically to Harvard and Yale
Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19185 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:05 pm to
What a dumb post frozen water boy
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Why are universities with strong athletic curricula, looked down upon by some....
quote:

I think you can compare the Football curricula at schools like Alabama, LSU, and Ohio St. to the curricula at schools like Julliard.
quote:

strong athletic curricula

quote:

LSU



Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

thats like comparing LSU academically to Harvard and Yale


LSU has more players in the NFL than any other college program.

I am measuring the success of graduates of the football curriculum. It really isn't that hard to understand.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:09 pm
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14798 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Why are universities with strong athletic curricula, looked down upon by some


Huh? Nobody looks down on schools with strong athletic curricula. I think PE is great.
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
4098 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:10 pm to
You, my friend, sound like you have the aura of someone who has previously gone hot air ballooning.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70143 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:10 pm to
What is a julliard?
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70143 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:12 pm to
Football isn't a curriculum
Unless you are referring to coaching football that was once taught by Sam Nader

Tim Pope almost failed that class back in 2002
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:12 pm to
This is just stupid.
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

This is just stupid.


It's not.

Acting and music are both forms of entertainment; so is football. All are Billion dollar industries. They are all the same thing.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
42938 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:16 pm to
Football isn’t a curriculum, retard.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:16 pm to
And if a school for football ever is established, it can be considered a part of the same ilk.

But your argument is that Juilliard, a School for the Arts, is the same as Ohio State having a football “curriculum” (which is not a thing, by the way). So yes, it’s stupid.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:18 pm
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Football isn’t a curriculum, retard.


quote:

the subjects comprising a course of study in a school or college




You are dumb. Plenty of people go to college only to learn football.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:21 pm
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:20 pm to
Well does anyone major in “football”?

And plenty of people also go to college to meet someone rich to marry. It’s jokingly referred to as getting an “MRS” degree. Yet I’m pretty sure that’s not a curriculum.

What someone goes to college for and what they study or major in while they are there are not always the same thing. I don’t consider “getting drunk on most weekdays” a curriculum but it’s sure as shite one of the reasons I couldn’t wait to go to college.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:23 pm
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

But your argument is that Juilliard, a School for the Arts, is the same as Ohio State having a football “curriculum” (which is not a thing, by the way). So yes, it’s stupid.


"The Arts" comprises many different curricula. Ohio St. offers many different curricula.

The point was that some so-called intellectuals look down on university athletics while laud schools like Julliard.

You can't be so obtuse that you don't understand this.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:23 pm
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
43342 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:22 pm to
WTF is an “athletic curriculum”?
Posted by LakeViewLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
17730 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Well does anyone major in “football”?


Thats semantics. Many players are majoring in football.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 9:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram