- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are so many of you poosies afraid of getting vaccinated?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:20 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:20 pm to Korkstand
quote:
he's a liar. Now that I think about it I don't know which is more likely.
Well you have claimed all he does is lie but now you believe
The mental gymnastics is what's so funny
0
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:21 pm to Korkstand
quote:Believes his freedom comes from his government
Korkstand
Getting vaccinated is his way of saying:
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:23 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:Uh no, that is frustration with having to deal with so much stupid.
Damn...that is fear mongering at a professional level!
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:24 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
So I take it youre up for buying a new car from a first time carmaker, that hasnt been certified by the FMCSA or the EPA?
I would rather the car made by a company making these types of things for the past 100+ years (Pfizer).
I guess you would prefer the first time automaker from China with a much worse “crash test rating.”
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:25 pm to Roaad
quote:
Believes his freedom comes from his government
Look, the whole politard gang is here.
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:26 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Uh no, that is frustration with having to deal with so much stupid.
Stupid?
So not wanting a “vaccine” with unknown long term effects is stupid?
Keep in mind that the companies making these “vaccines” have no culpability.
Lastly, I have already had the Rona, so why bother with a vaccine?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:27 pm to Ajo Devil
I just got my positive result today, and I’m happier to have my body fight it
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:29 pm to Ric Flair
quote:
I would rather the car made by a company making these types of things for the past 100+ years
Liar. No you wouldnt. Otherwise you would have driven one of these
Chevy Vega
Ford Pinto
Cadillac Cimarron
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:31 pm to Ric Flair
quote:
I would rather the car made by a company making these types of things for the past 100+ years (Pfizer).
In this case, however, it is a car with a new engine...one that has had no long term safety tests.
If the car has a major defect that doesn’t present itself immediately, like say at 50,000 miles it explodes (without warning ) while you were tooling around town, is your family allowed to sue the car company?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:31 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
FMCSA
Pssst - I don’t disagree with you but FMCSA only approves commercial vehicles
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:32 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So not wanting a “vaccine” with unknown long term effects is stupid?
When did over half the OT become health nuts? They’re ok with smoking a pack of cigs a day while working at a carcinogen laden chemical plant, and drinking a six pack of hepatotoxic beer after work.
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:34 pm to greygoose
quote:
I’m far more vaccinated than you are. Don’t see the need for COVID19 vaccine yet tho
Ah, I see a fellow vet that served overseas!
That’s 3 of us goose. Walked the line a few times .
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:36 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:Ya.
Stupid?
quote:If the alternative is a disease that also has unknown long term effects, yes.
So not wanting a “vaccine” with unknown long term effects is stupid?
quote:None whatsoever, huh? Do I have to use the s-word again?
Keep in mind that the companies making these “vaccines” have no culpability.
quote:Probably just as good imo.
Lastly, I have already had the Rona, so why bother with a vaccine?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:43 pm to Korkstand
quote:
So not wanting a “vaccine” with unknown long term effects is stupid?
If the alternative is a disease that also has unknown long term effects, yes.
Would anyone knowing choose to get the Rona and it’s unknown long term effects? No.
Then why would they choose to forego logic when considering the “vaccines?”
quote:
Keep in mind that the companies making these “vaccines” have no culpability. None whatsoever, huh?
Do I have to use the s-word again?
Are you suggesting that these companies are liable for the effects of these vaccines?
This is not my understanding. You will have to link your stance to support it. Otherwise, the s-word should apply to you for not understanding how liability (or rather, the lack thereof) relates to these companies in this circumstance.
This post was edited on 4/27/21 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 4/27/21 at 9:53 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
if the car has a major defect that doesn’t present itself immediately, like say at 50,000 miles it explodes
See: Ford Pinto
Posted on 4/27/21 at 10:00 pm to Korkstand
quote:
long term effects
Quit pissing into the wind thinking you have a point. The disease is a year and half old, so no one knows its long term effects.
What are the proven long term effects of SARS? How about MERS?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 10:02 pm to RobbBobb
Afraid.......or just don't want to.
Posted on 4/27/21 at 10:12 pm to Ajo Devil
quote:No, I would have to put on my stupid pants if I let them squirt something in my body that has had no testing for long range effects.
big boy pants
Posted on 4/27/21 at 10:15 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:I'm not foregoing logic. I understand that vaccines carry risks, and that I chose to take on 100% of that risk by getting vaccinated. However I also understand that we have already seen well over a billion person-months of after effects period with no downsides so far.
Would anyone knowing choose to get the Rona and it’s unknown long term effects? No.
Then why would they choose to forego logic when considering the “vaccines?”
I also understand that choosing to not vaccinate does not mean that one has chosen to get covid, but also that even 10% of the risks of covid is worse than 100% of the risks of the vaccine. We know that, at minimum, covid can damage the heart and lungs. That's long-term stuff.
What's not logical?
quote:No, I'm suggesting that they would be culpable, which is the term that you used. If these vaccines end up doing more harm than good, what do you think will happen to these companies? How long do you think it would be before they are trusted again? Do you think they would survive it?
Are you suggesting that these companies are liable for the effects of these vaccines?
Posted on 4/27/21 at 10:16 pm to RobbBobb
quote:So you require proof that a disease does have long-term effects, but you require proof that a vaccine does not have long-term effects?
The disease is a year and half old, so no one knows its long term effects.
What are the proven long term effects of SARS? How about MERS?
quote:
Quit pissing into the wind thinking you have a point.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News