- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who has right of way here?
Posted on 6/3/16 at 9:57 am to CaptainsWafer
Posted on 6/3/16 at 9:57 am to CaptainsWafer
Alright.
All I'm saying is that if you were at the intersection, in a real life scenario, I'd like to think that people would have a clearer vision and understanding of what the sign actually is. That's all.
All I'm saying is that if you were at the intersection, in a real life scenario, I'd like to think that people would have a clearer vision and understanding of what the sign actually is. That's all.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
It's not a construction sign, it's a warning sign for an intersection.
ETA: The bigger issue is that it's not an MUTCD approved sign as far as I can tel
That is because it is not a MUTCD sign, which means it is a special use sign, which 99% of the time means a type of construction.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 10:49 am to JamalSanders
quote:
That is because it is not a MUTCD sign, which means it is a special use sign, which 99% of the time means a type of construction.
I think it's more likely that the illustration was just made by someone that doesn't know any better. MUTCD has construction signs.
The sign in the illustration is clearly for an intersection. Here it is blown up:
It's a sign that shouldn't exist in the USA.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 11:17 am to burdman
quote:
If that's a yield sign for #2 then it's 3,2,1.
You would have 3 turn left in front of the oncoming 2? 2 isn't turning right.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 11:25 am to Broke
The answer is 231 but why the hell is there a yield sign at 1...? Should obviously be a stop sign
Posted on 6/3/16 at 12:39 pm to tiger91
quote:
Appears that 1 & 2 have a yield sign ... so 3 goes first. And if 1 & 2 do in fact have a yield sign, who DOES go first I would say depends on who got their first.
This is the sign for #2
ETA...this is a Belgian road sign, as far as I can tell.
This post was edited on 6/3/16 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 6/3/16 at 2:38 pm to tiger91
thats the dumbest setup of signs ever.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 6:05 pm to Broke
You guys don't see the difference in the yield sign at #1 and the sign at #2? No wonder we have such bad drivers.
"What was that triangular sign back there?"
"
"
"What was that triangular sign back there?"
"
"Posted on 6/3/16 at 6:08 pm to Broke
#2 car is definitely not a yield sign and was put there just to incite comments
Think about the wrecks a yield sign would cause on a roadway in that situation
Think about the wrecks a yield sign would cause on a roadway in that situation
Posted on 6/3/16 at 6:46 pm to 19thHole
If anyone pulled out in front of vehicle 2 then I would write them at fault
Posted on 6/3/16 at 7:15 pm to Broke
quote:
Who has right of way here?
Largest vehicle..... D'uhr.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 7:54 pm to Broke
Three, the other two have yield signs.
Posted on 6/3/16 at 7:56 pm to Broke
Sorry, 2 goes first, that's not a yield. Then three then one.
What kills me is when I'm at a stop sign waiting to take a left and some guy pulls up and takes a right across from me as I'm taking a left.
Wait your Damn turn. Damn
What kills me is when I'm at a stop sign waiting to take a left and some guy pulls up and takes a right across from me as I'm taking a left.
Wait your Damn turn. Damn
Posted on 6/3/16 at 8:01 pm to Broke
Keep this Facebook shite off OT
Posted on 6/3/16 at 8:01 pm to Broke
Keep this Facebook shite off OT
Popular
Back to top

1











