Started By
Message

re: What’s the reason for not circumcising your kid?

Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:32 pm to
Posted by Manarchist
Member since Nov 2018
404 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:32 pm to
Higher on what scale? What’s the rate of circumcised vs uncircumcised?
Posted by BananaManCan
Member since Sep 2009
4353 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:34 pm to
I had my kids foreskin removed and now use it as a steering wheel cover.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56532 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

I had my kids foreskin removed and now use it as a steering wheel cover.



Should be

quote:

BananaCanMan

Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Manarchist


Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56532 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:37 pm to
I'm not a hard-up advocate against it, but I do think it's a bit odd how it suddenly became en vogue in America in so quick a time. Your great grand pappy sure didn't have a v neck.
Posted by Manarchist
Member since Nov 2018
404 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:41 pm to
I see you like cutting up infants.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50453 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Yeah, you’re feelings don’t really amount to much.



Literally from the article you just posted:

quote:

studies have demonstrated that there is lower risk for syphilis in circumcised patients as compared to uncircumcised ones. Langerhans cells that exist on the inner surface of the preputium, are close to the surface because of the thin structure of the keratin layer and these cells are critical for some infections. In uncircumcised men, the presence of the thin, keratinized mucosal layer may allow the passage of viral pathogens to the lymphoid cells (Langerhans cells). Removal of the foreskin will block this potential port. For this reason, the World Health Organization has made a great effort for circumcision to be widely performed in Africa.


quote:

revious studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between circumcision and penile cancer.[19] The most important risk factor for penile cancer is phymosis, which explains the fact that neonatal circumcision is more protective against penile cancer compared to circumcision performed at older ages.



So, between the two of us alone in this thread - we've posted scholarly journal articles that highlight the health benefits of circumcision.

I'm glad we came to an agreement.
Posted by Manarchist
Member since Nov 2018
404 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:46 pm to
What’s the difference in risk?
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:46 pm to
Nah. I’m more against it than you actually. When my kid was born we refused to cut the umbilical cord.
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10713 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

I'm not a hard-up advocate against it, but I do think it's a bit odd how it suddenly became en vogue in America in so quick a time. Your great grand pappy sure didn't have a v neck.


Times are a changing and I don't like most of it.

But this is one I think we'll look at 100 years from now and wonder. Like riding in the back of a truck, or standing up in the front seat of a car without a seatbelt while your parents were smoking kool menthols with the windows rolled up.

I did those things and it was completely normal then. Now it's unheard of.

Someone else pointed to the falling stats in the US. So I think its prevalence will continue to wane in the US.

I'm not militant about it and definitely weighed the "social cost" when choosing not to do it. It bothered me to think about my infant being brought into this world and about the first thing he experiences is going under the knife--can't remember if they did or do use anesthesia. But they didn't for a time "because they won't remember it." Which is ridiculous. They won't remember lots of things but we still try to protect them from pain.

My wife was against it at first but came around to my way of thinking. Son seems OK with it, but he did ask me at one point and I explained my reasoning. Not something we talk about too much.

I don't judge people for having it done. I think most people don't give it a lot of thought--it's almost an automatic option in southern hospitals. I even recall the "are you sure?" question at the hospital.

But don't judge people who opt for a different path. I think the decision to not do it will ultimately be on the right side of history.
Posted by Manarchist
Member since Nov 2018
404 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:47 pm to
What are the rates of penile cancer?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50453 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

What’s the difference in risk?


"Significant" according to this peer reviewed journal article:

LINK

quote:

Results: Uncircumcised men were significantly more likely than circumcised men to have gonorrhoea in the multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, race, and site, in both the cross sectional (odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9 to 1.7) and in the cohort analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.6).
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50453 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:54 pm to
Another bit of info from WebMD:

quote:

Circumcised men have a 25% lower risk of genital herpes and a 35% lower risk of HPV, the virus that causes genital warts and cancers.

The data come from a study in Uganda that already has shown circumcision effective in reducing a man's risk of HIV infection from heterosexual sex. The two-year study by Johns Hopkins researcher Aaron A.R. Tobian, MD, PhD, and colleagues enrolled nearly 3,400 men negative for HSV-2, the genital herpes virus.


quote:

Data from earlier studies indicate that monogamous women with circumcised sex partners are only half as likely to get cervical cancer as are women with uncircumcised sex partners.


So, essentially it's significantly safer for both the male and his female partner for him to be circumcised.

LINK
This post was edited on 2/8/21 at 10:56 pm
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86556 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

This has got to be such a painful and terrifying thing to do as an adult
I was like six. I still remember that shite to this day. No anesthesia either.
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10713 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 10:57 pm to
quote:


So, between the two of us alone in this thread - we've posted scholarly journal articles that highlight the health benefits of circumcision.


It's not so cut (ahem) and dried.

We asked our Dr. about it beforehand. He didn't have a strong opinion for or against and wouldn't say it's medically beneficial, on balance.

All of these "reduced risks" are widely held and I believe they are true. But how big of a risk? And shouldn't this be weighed?

The FIRST link that came up with google (Mayo Clinic):

LINK

Definitely points out some of the same lowered risks everyone else is talking about...but also goes on to say:

quote:

The risks of not being circumcised, however, are not only rare, but avoidable with proper care of the penis.


I believe MOST of it is indeed about tradition and religion. And there's nothing wrong with that.

But I also think it speaks to the hubris of man to think we can improve on God's creation--or a million years of evolution, whichever you prefer. Again, there is no other modification we make to infants as a matter of course.
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
12273 posts
Posted on 2/8/21 at 11:56 pm to
Devils Advocate, I am torn on the issue but both my boys were trimmed up.

1. Insurance doesn't pay for it, it is more and more common that this is not covered.

2. It is a permanent body modification, some parents think their boys should choose at a later point in life if they want to get the hood off or not.

3. Some people think you get more pleasure uncut, I don't know how you could ever prove this OR disprove this.

4. Many libertarians think this is a violation of NAP.
Posted by tBacon
Member since Dec 2012
226 posts
Posted on 2/9/21 at 1:14 am to
It seems like you put a lot of thought into this.

Why?
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
21947 posts
Posted on 2/9/21 at 4:44 am to
World Health Organization (WHO) estimated 30% of adult males worldwide (aged 15+) are circumcised, with about two-thirds of those being Muslims


Are you muslim asking for a friend?
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
21057 posts
Posted on 2/9/21 at 5:32 am to
quote:

eason to do it are obvious IMO



Less chance of cancer and a slew of other health problems

Cleaner and less chance of STDs when using it

Sign of the covenant with God
Posted by ike221
Loo A Vul
Member since Aug 2006
13856 posts
Posted on 2/9/21 at 5:42 am to
Circumsizing reduces sensation and can cause decreased size when developing

So theres that
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram