Started By
Message

re: What's a concept that's hard to wrap your head around?

Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:03 pm to
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9131 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:03 pm to
3 highly trained professional referees being the only people on Earth to not see one of the most blatant pass interferences ever. Everyone instantly recognized what happened except for the 3 most qualified people. It would be like everyone in America draining a 3-pointer but then Steph Curry, Steve Kerr, and Ray Allen throw up bricks.
Posted by unbeWEAVEable
The Golf Board Godfather
Member since Apr 2010
13637 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:04 pm to
Fractals
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
37013 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:06 pm to
Yes
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
8036 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:10 pm to
Vastness of the universe has been menti8ned, but I can't wrap my head around the origins, big bang theory stuff.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105274 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:15 pm to
You actually have a very slight but measurably better chance of the coin coming up on the side you call. This is an argument in favor of the existence of telekinesis.
Posted by BlindTiger7
Houston
Member since Sep 2016
3071 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

There is an end to the universe somewhere out there.


And what's on the other side of the end of the universe?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

And what's on the other side of the end of the universe?



and what was there before?
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

And what's on the other side of the end of the universe?


Nothing. But nothing is something.

Point being, our language isn't even equipped to deal with the universe.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
8341 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:22 pm to
One of Newton’s laws. I’m sure I’m totally butchering this - if a bullet hit a mosquito the force/impact of the bullet hitting the mosquito, is the same as the mosquito hitting the bullet.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105274 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:23 pm to
That Newton smoked an impressive amount of weed.
Posted by BlindTiger7
Houston
Member since Sep 2016
3071 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:25 pm to
The same thing that's always been there: Infinity universe
Posted by BlindTiger7
Houston
Member since Sep 2016
3071 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:26 pm to
You're right.

But like you said, empty space is something.


Just think of it as the entire universe being in a box. What's outside of the box?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105274 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:27 pm to
Another box.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:47 pm to
Electrons, photons, protons, etc. I know we can describe their behavior and properties and even exploit them in practically magical ways, but seriously, WTF are they? They're all indistinguishable from each other, like they come from some perfect factory. They're our whole reality along with spacetime, which is unspeakably weird in its own right.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3139 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 10:57 pm to
The Monty Hall Problem:

Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

Under the standard assumptions, contestants who switch have a 2/3 chance of winning the car, while contestants who stick to their initial choice have only a 1/3 chance.

wikipedia monty hall problem

The wiki article mentions PhDs and Nobel prize physicists giving the wrong answer and insisting the logic is flawed. It's so counterintuitive only 13% of people switched choices in one study.

Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22341 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 11:03 pm to
Do girls poop, or is this just a myth?
Posted by Erebus
Member since Jan 2019
574 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 11:05 pm to
Suing ones parents for being born
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17600 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

There are so many possible orders of cards in a deck that every time you shuffle, it is likely the first time in history that particular order occurred. 52 factorial is a big number


I’ve thought about this occasionally and yes, 52 factorial is a number I can’t understand.

However, there are other factors at work other than just probability. The first time each deck is ever shuffled, the cards are in the same order. I’ve seen people do amazing things with a deck of cards and find it very reasonable that someone could shuffle the cards laying each one over the other, one by one.

That would result in an identical shuffle. But yes, if the starting decks were at random, almost impossible to repeat a shuffle.
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4934 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 11:20 pm to
Sleeping with Hillary Clinton.Makes me gag to think about it.
Posted by Cocotheape
Member since Aug 2015
4242 posts
Posted on 2/5/19 at 11:27 pm to
GILTI from the TCJA.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram