- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:50 am to Bruco
She set a 5 minute timer for him to agree to follow decorum. He declined, so he remains out of the courtroom.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:50 am to bikerack
quote:
An appellate judge could say that her requiring him to write a pledge was improper.
Based on what lawful law?
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:50 am to Bruco
Poor Lil Tink Tink
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:51 am to Bruco
They really should just do a side-by-side video while she is reading the charges. We got a ways to go, might as well see Brooks acting a fool
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:51 am to IT_Dawg
Looks like ole baw is writing something
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:52 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
We got a ways to go, might as well see Brooks acting a fool
I want an audio feed. That bailiff is gonna have some stories for beers with his buddies
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:54 am to IT_Dawg
DA closing should be 20 seconds:
Not really sure what else to say. I think we have proven all charges beyond a reasonable doubt and So did Mr Brook's own witnesses on his "defense." His witnesses put him as the driver of the SUV and showed no remorse. Happy to end this here so you all can go home quickly. Thank you for your service
Not really sure what else to say. I think we have proven all charges beyond a reasonable doubt and So did Mr Brook's own witnesses on his "defense." His witnesses put him as the driver of the SUV and showed no remorse. Happy to end this here so you all can go home quickly. Thank you for your service
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:55 am to Proximo
quote:
Looks like ole baw is writing something
Dude is probably drawing a picture of the judge playing with his pecker
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:55 am to Bruco
Over/under on the # of times he will object in the State’s closing? I say 75.
This post was edited on 10/25/22 at 11:57 am
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:56 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Not really sure what else to say. I think we have proven all charges beyond a reasonable doubt and So did Mr Brook's own witnesses on his "defense." His witnesses put him as the driver of the SUV and showed no remorse. Happy to end this here so you all can go home quickly. Thank you for your service
Brooks also said during his "opening" that he didn't argue with the facts of the case.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:57 am to Bruco
quote:
Some judge tossing this conviction would seem to me (not a lawyer) to create a ridiculously dangerous precedent for defendants who have no real chance of really benefiting from legal counsel
Totally agree. I (not a lawyer) think it would lay out a terrible blueprint where it would be beneficial to appear pro se then intentionally derail proceedings and insist you don't know what's going on. There's no way that can be upheld.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:00 pm to gravy553
Does anyone on here think the jury will find him not guilty on a single one of the charges?
I am guessing they will quickly appoint a foreman, take a blind poll when they first get in there, and wont even discuss a single charge. All 12 will vote guilty on all 78 the first vote.
They will take more time picking a foreman and filling out the verdict form, than actually discussing the charges....
I am guessing they will quickly appoint a foreman, take a blind poll when they first get in there, and wont even discuss a single charge. All 12 will vote guilty on all 78 the first vote.
They will take more time picking a foreman and filling out the verdict form, than actually discussing the charges....
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:02 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Does anyone on here think the jury will find him not guilty on a single one of the charges?
No
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:02 pm to IT_Dawg
Normally I am suspect of the defense getting at least one sympathizer on the jury in cases like these, but did Brooks basically skip over jury selection? I didn't see that part.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:06 pm to tterrific
I know he tried to strike the whole jury pool. Otherwise, I don't know how he handled it either.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:07 pm to IT_Dawg
Joke's on the jury. He'll simply not consent to being charged with those crimes and he'll be set free.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:07 pm to Wayne Campbell
I have not been able to keep up with this.
Does Wisconsin have the death penalty?
Does Wisconsin have the death penalty?
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:08 pm to tterrific
quote:
Normally I am suspect of the defense getting at least one sympathizer on the jury in cases like these, but did Brooks basically skip over jury selection? I didn't see that part.
Yes... he basically skipped voir dire due to his behavior
He tried to strike the whole jury pool
Posted on 10/25/22 at 12:08 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
They will take more time picking a foreman and filling out the verdict formS, than actually discussing the charges....
They've got 78 forms to fill out...i think it takes them 5 mins to elect the foreman, 2 minutes to vote guilty for all and 90 mins to fill out and sign the 78 forms.
Page 97 of 184
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News