re: Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Trial - Brooks Gets 6-Life Sent. + 762.5 yrs in prison

For the amount of counts there is, that is insane that they reached a verdict that quickly.

It means they found him guilty on every count, pretty much.

As the verdicts are read, how long before he loses his shite?

What was the fake Reddit post talking about?

Rot in insignificance Darrell you piece of shite. He loves to manipulate and hear himself talk, I hope they put him in solitary so he can argue with the walls until he breaks.

quote:

---

they didn't actually do anything besides lie on the internet for laughs

---

Just because they called it a prank doesn't make it so. They crawfished after they saw it was blowing up and there could be real trouble for them. What if a single juror was influenced?

So they lie first, then take back that lie but we're supposed to believe them that it was a prank? We'll let the Sheriffs decide that.

Also, you don't actually have to be on the jury for a jury tampering charge baw. Maxine Waters was almost charged during GF trial.

quote:

---

Waters responded that she was "looking for the guilty verdict" and encouraged protesters to stay in the streets and "fight for justice." The questioner followed up by asking Waters if she was looking for a guilty verdict just for Chauvin’s manslaughter charge, and she said "Oh, no, not manslaughter. … This is guilty for murder."

The questioner then asked Waters, "What should protesters do," assuming Chavin was not convicted. The Congress member told protesters they must "stay on the street" and "get more confrontational" so that "they know that we mean business."

---

quote:

---

"The idea is that it is a public trial; I think the court has accomplished that, but the media attention is so profound … and it is so pervasive that I just don’t know how this jury can really be said to be that they are free from the taint of this," Nelson said. "And now that we have U.S. representatives threatening acts of violence in relation to this specific case, it’s mind-boggling to me."

Cahill denied the motion, telling Chauvin’s defense team that he trusted the jury was following his instructions to avoid the news.

"I don’t think it has prejudiced us with additional material that would prejudice his jury," Cahill said. "A congresswoman’s opinion really doesn’t matter a whole lot."

However, he also said he wished "elected officials would stop talking about this case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch," and admitted that Waters’ remarks might be grounds for appeal in the future.

---

On 76 counts (with lesser included possible)... they deliberated for like 4 hours total... maybe less

Brooks fukkkkkkkkkkked

quote:

---

What if a single juror was influenced?

---

It's the jurors responsibility and oath to avoid public media. Literally anything online could influence them. You going to prosecute the entire online community for possibly influencing a juror?

quote:

---

Brooks fukkkkkkkkkkked

---

I can't wait to watch this unfold.

quote:

---

What if a single juror was influenced?

---

A juror being influenced by something they read online about the case would be a problem for the juror, not the author of the fake post, right?

quote:

---

Also, you don't actually have to be on the jury for a jury tampering charge baw.

---

How would posting fake info on a widely read message board constitute jury tampering?