Started By
Message

re: Wages Breakdown

Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:16 am to
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:16 am to
nice breakdown dude

op - you need to hire this guy to do your books
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:18 am to
You understand that you can’t multiply bi-weekly paychecks x 2 right? You have 26 pay periods a year. Also, his health care cost and retirement contribution are pretax deductions.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38685 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Mr Perfect


Thanks but actually the breakdown is wrong because I assumed the 650 was per month on insurance. He is saying it's 650 bi weekly and company pays 75%


And he couldn't afford me and I'm not working for some company that thinks it's smart to pay $67,600 for health insurance a year. Companies like that don't stay around long.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61710 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:23 am to
650 dollars is 25% of HC insurance

You said bi weekly.

The policy is 5200 bucks a month? Y’all may need some negotiating skills.

Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
33054 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:24 am to
No, he doesn't understand and his numbers are likely way off.

That's the reason he isn't replying anymore.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61710 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:24 am to
you took my moment
This post was edited on 10/4/19 at 10:25 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61710 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Not sure if you suck at math or at typing. Actually looks like both.

Your number for how much it cost a company look fine, but let's break down that 60k salary.

If your salary is 60k

401k-5% =$3000
Insurance-$650/month(your statement=7800/year

So our taxable income is $49,200

For the year our taxes break down like this

Federal
Marginal rate of 12%
Effective rate of ~8.69% so $4,274
Fica tax-7.65% so $3,764

State/local tax for someone in BR
Marginal rate-4%
Effective rate-2.7% = $1,327

So our 2018 take home would have been 39,836 or there about.

Total income tax burden is around 19.03% or $9,364


2017 you would have had a federal effectivs rate of 11.05% or an increase in federal taxes of $1,165

Now in BR you would have also had sales and property tax. On average in that income you would ha d paid about $1250 in sales, another $1400 on property if you owned a house.

frick anyone who says we should be paying more taxes.
this looks about right.
Posted by Coloradeaux
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Dec 2013
212 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:26 am to
#YANGGANG2020
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122527 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:27 am to
quote:

You really don’t understand cost of benefits.
What a person makes and what it costs to employ them are completely different numbers. In the majority of places a $60k employee costs around $91k to employ them. The bosses pay taxes too, and a lot of other stuff. Depending on how people file yes a $91k salary results in a $35k net job


Okay, I made a mistake.

So someone who makes $60k, this company pays $91.8k to employee them. So it cost $31,800 more to employ someone who makes $60k.

Are these employees billable? What is their value to the company?

Anyway, after 10 months, before takes they made $50k. At the very least they should have taken home no less than the upper $30k. But you are complaining about how much it cost to employee them.

You hire people to fill positions that provides a need to the company, so there is a certain amount employees are worth to the company.

Lets say someone has a job that uses data provided within the company, to find ways to save the company money on certain projects. If that person is saving money for the company that is more than $31,800.00, is it really costing to employ them?
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66992 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:30 am to
A couple of comments:

1. I hate when companies include in "cost of employment" employees' vacation.
It's not like the company hires an extra person at equivalent salary to fill in while employee is on holiday. Further, where does the free earnings for the company get factored in when the employee is working overtime with no pay?

2. Since pensions have all but vanished, I wonder when companies will start trimming again and whittle away at that 401k match and health insurance.
Posted by SpeckledTiger
Denham Springs
Member since Jul 2010
1482 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

$60k, family of 4. Pays nearly ZERO in taxes when you add in the credits and take out the deductions.



You're assuming single income. If married, this employee may just be carrying the total health costs.

Also, the OP including PTO in the cost of employment in this context is redundant. Sure it's listed as a liability overall, but it shouldn't be on a cash flow statement since if/when PTO is actually paid out, you wouldn't be paying the normal salary expense.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122527 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:35 am to
He has to be trolling because the OP doesn't really make that much sense.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38685 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

this looks about right.


It's actually off a little. I assumed 650 was monthly and I think I did it for two instead of 4 people. But it's pretty close and shows he is full of shite.

And I just can't fath how his company thinks it's a good idea to pay 50k just their part in insurance. Blows my mind.
Posted by Stiles
Member since Sep 2017
3458 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

What is the cost of benefits at your company?

84%. That’s just the benefits (health, pension, annuity, vacation) I don’t even know what the taxes and insurance they pay on me so I’m guessing significantly more.

I’m still don’t get how you’re getting these numbers.

quote:

a family of say 4 then pays 36% of their pay to taxes, insurances, retirement and the likes

quote:

employee has taken home less than

Are you stating that your employees are paying insurances through you and not getting that nominal number on their checks to pay to an insurance company? Because to (I guess) almost everyone, that’s not considered a deduction, it’s called paying a bill.

Retirement is different too. Just because it’s not on their take home pay doesn’t mean it isn’t realized income to them sitting in an account with their name on it. Put it this way, if they didn’t elect to get retirement withheld, it would end up on their take home pay. That’s $2600 right there back on their check.

Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

1. I hate when companies include in "cost of employment" employees' vacation.
It's not like the company hires an extra person at equivalent salary to fill in while employee is on holiday. Further, where does the free earnings for the company get factored in when the employee is working overtime with no pay?


I disagree. If you give someone 4 weeks vacation instead of 2 weeks vacation, what does it cost the company? It is a cost that has to be accounted for.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61710 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:51 am to
quote:

And I just can't fath how his company thinks it's a good idea to pay 50k just their part in insurance. Blows my mind.
that is my thought exactly

Posted by wasteland
City of peace
Member since Apr 2011
5923 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 11:00 am to
Shut up stupid. Your input is making op look like a genius
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25930 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 11:51 am to
Health insurance is stupid expensive. Last place I worked had under 30 employees and it would have cost me $1200 per month out my check to insure our family of 5. Ended up declining their insurance and went through my wife’s employer as it was $750/month. Fast forward and now we are living in a new city and currently have $900/month deducted out of paycheck for health/dental/vision coverage.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
25970 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

That's why if you don't make 6-figs you are considered a poor.

Not if you don't have kids and live in an affordable house.
Posted by RPtoDoubleT
Dallas
Member since Oct 2007
513 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 12:38 pm to
Just when I thought the math and language could not be butchered any further than the OP... OweO shows up and proves us all wrong.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram