- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:18 am to Jp1LSU
You understand that you can’t multiply bi-weekly paychecks x 2 right? You have 26 pay periods a year. Also, his health care cost and retirement contribution are pretax deductions.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:23 am to Mr Perfect
quote:
Mr Perfect
Thanks but actually the breakdown is wrong because I assumed the 650 was per month on insurance. He is saying it's 650 bi weekly and company pays 75%
And he couldn't afford me and I'm not working for some company that thinks it's smart to pay $67,600 for health insurance a year. Companies like that don't stay around long.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:23 am to Jp1LSU
650 dollars is 25% of HC insurance
You said bi weekly.
The policy is 5200 bucks a month? Y’all may need some negotiating skills.
You said bi weekly.
The policy is 5200 bucks a month? Y’all may need some negotiating skills.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:24 am to VABuckeye
No, he doesn't understand and his numbers are likely way off.
That's the reason he isn't replying anymore.
That's the reason he isn't replying anymore.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:24 am to lsu777
you took my moment
This post was edited on 10/4/19 at 10:25 am
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:26 am to lsu777
quote:this looks about right.
Not sure if you suck at math or at typing. Actually looks like both.
Your number for how much it cost a company look fine, but let's break down that 60k salary.
If your salary is 60k
401k-5% =$3000
Insurance-$650/month(your statement=7800/year
So our taxable income is $49,200
For the year our taxes break down like this
Federal
Marginal rate of 12%
Effective rate of ~8.69% so $4,274
Fica tax-7.65% so $3,764
State/local tax for someone in BR
Marginal rate-4%
Effective rate-2.7% = $1,327
So our 2018 take home would have been 39,836 or there about.
Total income tax burden is around 19.03% or $9,364
2017 you would have had a federal effectivs rate of 11.05% or an increase in federal taxes of $1,165
Now in BR you would have also had sales and property tax. On average in that income you would ha d paid about $1250 in sales, another $1400 on property if you owned a house.
frick anyone who says we should be paying more taxes.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:27 am to Jp1LSU
quote:
You really don’t understand cost of benefits.
What a person makes and what it costs to employ them are completely different numbers. In the majority of places a $60k employee costs around $91k to employ them. The bosses pay taxes too, and a lot of other stuff. Depending on how people file yes a $91k salary results in a $35k net job
Okay, I made a mistake.
So someone who makes $60k, this company pays $91.8k to employee them. So it cost $31,800 more to employ someone who makes $60k.
Are these employees billable? What is their value to the company?
Anyway, after 10 months, before takes they made $50k. At the very least they should have taken home no less than the upper $30k. But you are complaining about how much it cost to employee them.
You hire people to fill positions that provides a need to the company, so there is a certain amount employees are worth to the company.
Lets say someone has a job that uses data provided within the company, to find ways to save the company money on certain projects. If that person is saving money for the company that is more than $31,800.00, is it really costing to employ them?
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:30 am to Jp1LSU
A couple of comments:
1. I hate when companies include in "cost of employment" employees' vacation.
It's not like the company hires an extra person at equivalent salary to fill in while employee is on holiday. Further, where does the free earnings for the company get factored in when the employee is working overtime with no pay?
2. Since pensions have all but vanished, I wonder when companies will start trimming again and whittle away at that 401k match and health insurance.
1. I hate when companies include in "cost of employment" employees' vacation.
It's not like the company hires an extra person at equivalent salary to fill in while employee is on holiday. Further, where does the free earnings for the company get factored in when the employee is working overtime with no pay?
2. Since pensions have all but vanished, I wonder when companies will start trimming again and whittle away at that 401k match and health insurance.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:35 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
$60k, family of 4. Pays nearly ZERO in taxes when you add in the credits and take out the deductions.
You're assuming single income. If married, this employee may just be carrying the total health costs.
Also, the OP including PTO in the cost of employment in this context is redundant. Sure it's listed as a liability overall, but it shouldn't be on a cash flow statement since if/when PTO is actually paid out, you wouldn't be paying the normal salary expense.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:35 am to East Coast Band
He has to be trolling because the OP doesn't really make that much sense.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:38 am to tigerfoot
quote:
this looks about right.
It's actually off a little. I assumed 650 was monthly and I think I did it for two instead of 4 people. But it's pretty close and shows he is full of shite.
And I just can't fath how his company thinks it's a good idea to pay 50k just their part in insurance. Blows my mind.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:42 am to Jp1LSU
quote:
What is the cost of benefits at your company?
84%. That’s just the benefits (health, pension, annuity, vacation) I don’t even know what the taxes and insurance they pay on me so I’m guessing significantly more.
I’m still don’t get how you’re getting these numbers.
quote:
a family of say 4 then pays 36% of their pay to taxes, insurances, retirement and the likes
quote:
employee has taken home less than
Are you stating that your employees are paying insurances through you and not getting that nominal number on their checks to pay to an insurance company? Because to (I guess) almost everyone, that’s not considered a deduction, it’s called paying a bill.
Retirement is different too. Just because it’s not on their take home pay doesn’t mean it isn’t realized income to them sitting in an account with their name on it. Put it this way, if they didn’t elect to get retirement withheld, it would end up on their take home pay. That’s $2600 right there back on their check.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:44 am to East Coast Band
quote:
1. I hate when companies include in "cost of employment" employees' vacation.
It's not like the company hires an extra person at equivalent salary to fill in while employee is on holiday. Further, where does the free earnings for the company get factored in when the employee is working overtime with no pay?
I disagree. If you give someone 4 weeks vacation instead of 2 weeks vacation, what does it cost the company? It is a cost that has to be accounted for.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 10:51 am to lsu777
quote:that is my thought exactly
And I just can't fath how his company thinks it's a good idea to pay 50k just their part in insurance. Blows my mind.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 11:00 am to OweO
Shut up stupid. Your input is making op look like a genius
Posted on 10/4/19 at 11:51 am to wasteland
Health insurance is stupid expensive. Last place I worked had under 30 employees and it would have cost me $1200 per month out my check to insure our family of 5. Ended up declining their insurance and went through my wife’s employer as it was $750/month. Fast forward and now we are living in a new city and currently have $900/month deducted out of paycheck for health/dental/vision coverage.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 12:01 pm to The Torch
quote:Not if you don't have kids and live in an affordable house.
That's why if you don't make 6-figs you are considered a poor.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 12:38 pm to Jp1LSU
Just when I thought the math and language could not be butchered any further than the OP... OweO shows up and proves us all wrong. 
Popular
Back to top


1








