- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USCP will not charge anyone in the Senate gay sex video.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:39 pm to Undertow
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:39 pm to Undertow
quote:I think they would probably be charged with trespassing if they didn't work in the building, as the colbert show was. The reason Colberts charges were dropped is because they were invited in and never told to leave.
Imagine if this was 2 MAGAs that snuck into Nancy pelosi’s office and filmed a porno on her desk. It’s all you would hear about anytime you turned on the TV and the Dems would be livid. And they would be in jail right now.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 3:40 pm
0
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:17 pm to tide06
quote:
A closed door that can be opened does not meet a threshold of being protected or private.
People this invested in peosecuting some no name staffer are gayer than the dude with a dick up his arse.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:24 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
People this invested in peosecuting some no name staffer are gayer than the dude with a dick up his arse.
Its just like the democrats trying to charge Trump with all kinds of bullshite. The left and the right are the same.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:49 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
When there wasn’t immediately complete and total disdain for it, I realized that there are forces at work in American politics that I have no control over nor ever will have.
This is why I will vote for Trump. The "forces at work in American politics" in DC hate him and that's good enough for me.
You don't throw a grenade because you love the grenade, you throw to frick people up. Watching leftists squirm over Trump gives me fuel.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:54 pm to tide06
quote:
Don't you think there's a reason why high school kids and lovers don't use public buildings as a meetup shack? Hint: they'd go to jail if not prison.
They didn't at your school?
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:26 pm to Joshjrn
quote:Actually, you and I agree on this more than we disagree.
The actual standard is that the statute requires exposure “at such a time and place where as a reasonable man knows or should know his act will be open to the observation of others.” In the few cases I’ve skimmed, doors being closed and/or locked are of significant importance as they illustrate an intent for the act to remain private.
However, the fact that this was being captured on video does present an odd wrinkle to your point.
Are you asserting that the exposure must be live? Or can the recording serve as what we consider the exposure which completes that element of indecent public exposure? You see, it was in fact publicly exposed, albeit belatedly. This fact could be very relevant in terms of the fullest meaning of that element. So, the argument could be made that it may have been intended for exposure all along. We do live in the digital age - so to speak...
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:50 pm to Rabby
quote:
Actually, you and I agree on this more than we disagree.
However, the fact that this was being captured on video does present an odd wrinkle to your point.
Are you asserting that the exposure must be live? Or can the recording serve as what we consider the exposure which completes that element of indecent public exposure? You see, it was in fact publicly exposed, albeit belatedly. This fact could be very relevant in terms of the fullest meaning of that element. So, the argument could be made that it may have been intended for exposure all along. We do live in the digital age - so to speak...
For the sake of indecent exposure-esque laws, yes, I would argue that it would have to be live. With that said, practically every jurisdiction has more generalized laws that cover obscenity. As an example, Louisiana covers both under our Obscenity law: LINK
So our Section (A)(1) would cover behavior envisioned in the previously summarized (though not specifically quoted) public lewdness statute while (A)(2) would cover the recording of the act with the intent to disseminate it to the public for commercial gain. But as you can see, generally speaking, the location is irrelevant for (A)(2) type laws.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:56 pm to Roy Curado
If you’re liberal, no charge. Two tiered system is extremely obvious at this point
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:56 pm to Undertow
quote:
Imagine if this was 2 MAGAs that snuck into Nancy pelosi’s office and filmed a porno on her desk. It’s all you would hear about anytime you turned on the TV and the Dems would be livid. And they would be in jail right now.
Porno title:
Insurrection 2: Electric Boogaloo
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:16 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
What crime do y'all want them charged with?
Sodomy
Disorderly Conduct
Public Indecency
Voyeurism
Trespassing
Start there
Posted on 2/2/24 at 1:16 am to CAD703X
Those heavily armed right wing extremists, who happened to forget their guns when they went to overthrow the US government
Posted on 2/2/24 at 1:29 am to Smoke239
quote:
Sodomy
That’s a crime?
quote:
Disorderly Conduct
Eh. Maybe.
quote:
Public Indecency
They weren’t in public.
quote:
Voyeurism
Don’t think you understand what term.
quote:
Trespassing
It isn’t trespassing if you have access.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 1:30 am to Smoke239
quote:
Sodomy
Disorderly Conduct
Public Indecency
Voyeurism
Trespassing
Name 5 things that politicians do to the country everyday once they get elected.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 7:47 am to Smoke239
quote:
Sodomy
Disorderly Conduct
Public Indecency
Voyeurism
Trespassing
The first one was deemed unconstitutional over two decades ago. See: Lawrence v. Texas.
Link to the statutes for the rest and we can go through them line by line
Posted on 2/2/24 at 7:52 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
A bit mellow dramatic over a gay sex vid no? This is THE issue for you?
No it's the absurdity of all of it.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 7:56 am to Snipe
quote:
Why would any reasonable minded person have any trust in a system that allow this type of behaviors to go unchecked? Serious question? for those of you who still believe elections and getting the right people in Washington matter.
That’s what they want. They want you to lose faith in the system. They’re purposefully collapsing the system so no one will mind when they replace the system. Anyone who’s familiar with the history of communism, knows this is straight out of the communists handbook on how to bring about the “worldwide revolution of the proletariat”. None of this is by accident.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 7:59 am to pankReb
quote:
Public Indecency
quote:
They weren’t in public.
Help me understand how you came to such an absurdly stupid conclusion that the US Capital isn’t public. Walk me though that.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:03 am to pankReb
quote:
Public Indecency
They weren’t in public.
What?
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:05 am to Lsupimp
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:19 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
People this invested in peosecuting some no name staffer are gayer than the dude with a dick up his arse.
I don’t care what combination of inputs and outputs are involved, people shouldn’t be bending each other in a public government building.
Set aside the law, which I still believe would support a prosecution if the local authorities were inclined to do so.
Are the people against prosecution ok with people having sex in government buildings with an unlocked door that anyone could walk into?
Then filming it and posting it online.
No issue with that at all?
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News