- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U.S. Will Ban Smoking in Public Housing Nationwide
Posted on 12/27/16 at 7:46 pm to BowDownToLSU
Posted on 12/27/16 at 7:46 pm to BowDownToLSU
they can't keep out drugs, vandalism, hookers, and murder, how they hell they going to keep out tobacco?
Posted on 12/27/16 at 7:49 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
If they have kids, like most in public housing do, the give ain't evicting shite. They won't be throwing kids out onto the street.
This. First social media story about a woman with multiple frick trophies being put on the street and the riots will put Sterling to shame.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 7:49 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Since the property is owned by the government, I have no problem with this. But this is pretty much unenforceable.
I did some work for a GC that built 5 different 60 lot section 8 housing developments that were managed by a property management company when we were done. When doing our warranty work I always talked to the property manager. They have a major waiting list and evict people left and right. One of the main things they evict people for is grease fire damage from frying foods. It's crazy!
Posted on 12/27/16 at 7:56 pm to Byron Bojangles III
They should ban sex too. Would be about as successful as banning smokes.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:01 pm to ballscaster
If you enter into a government subsidy program, you should lose certain liberties. Like how you live, what you eat for food, what kind of car you drive. I guess they did that at one point with government cheese. You would lineup for your welfare food. I'm not sure why that one went away.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:03 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Since the property is owned by the government, I have no problem with this.
I have no problem with it either, especially being that the property is owned by us, the people.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:12 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Good. If you can afford cigarettes, you don't need the government's help finding a place to live
Look, I completely agree that there are tons of people in public housing who are only there because of poor life choices, and zero financial management skills, but a pack a day habit, average of $6 per day is only $186/month. That ain't exactly a rent payment in non subsidized housing. The much bigger issue than a smoker living in public housing is the rampant fraud and abuse of the public housing qualifications program. Let's fix that before blaming a smoking habit for forcing someone onto the government's teat.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:15 pm to BowDownToLSU
I think if they can afford $5+ a day on a pack of smokes, they shouldn't be in public housing to start with.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:29 pm to Darth_Vader
Smoking should be banned everywhere.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:30 pm to BowDownToLSU
Support, smoking inside is nasty.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:32 pm to BowDownToLSU
Good luck trying to police that one...
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:33 pm to BowDownToLSU
Smoking is bad
Milking welfare encouraged
Don't we want em to die quicker? Seems we would give em cigs and heroin with their keys
Milking welfare encouraged
Don't we want em to die quicker? Seems we would give em cigs and heroin with their keys
Posted on 12/27/16 at 8:57 pm to BowDownToLSU
Great so force the people outside to loiter in the streets.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:02 pm to BowDownToLSU
So where are we suppose to smoke our illegal weed?
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:04 pm to BowDownToLSU
Looks like a good idea until they come out with the "smoking ban enforcement department" with a 20 million dollar a year payroll.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:04 pm to LakeViewLSU
quote:
Even Newports and Black n Milds?
Those are exempt. Only white people cigs are banned.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:06 pm to BowDownToLSU
Roughly 50% of poor black people smoke so how is this going to work?
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:25 pm to The Boat
quote:
Roughly 50% of poor black people smoke so how is this going to work?
It won't. This is one of those feel good laws. "Look, we the law makers are doing something"!
Honestly they missed the trifecta of making middle class parents feel good about their leaders. If you add in a clause that says the poor people will pay a fine for smoking that will directly go to schools then you could get reelected for years.
1) Law that effects only poor people (especially people that have a reputation for committing crimes) CHECK
2) punishes smokers CHECK
3) has a nebulous provision that help the children CHECK
This post was edited on 12/27/16 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:30 pm to BowDownToLSU
quote:
Smoking will be prohibited in public housing residences nationwide ..
Try enforcing that one.
Posted on 12/27/16 at 9:56 pm to SuperSaint
I agree completely. If they require housing assistance, they shouldn't have $300 a month to spare on cigarettes. It wouldn't be a bad idea to study cost effectiveness of requiring smokers on government assistance for health care to complete cessation programs. I know and love lots of smokers. It's hard as hell to quit, but can the government possibly be generating more revenue off the taxes to ignore how costly poor, sick smokers are?
My insurance charges more for smokers. It's a penalty, and I wish they could figure out how to penalize smokers on Medicaid too without people freaking out.
My insurance charges more for smokers. It's a penalty, and I wish they could figure out how to penalize smokers on Medicaid too without people freaking out.
Popular
Back to top


0







