Started By
Message

re: U.S. GDP has tripled the last 20 years, do you think the country is 3x better than it was?

Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
8784 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

U.S. GDP has tripled the last 20 years, do you think the country is 3x better than it was?


It's mainly resulted in the very richest being 6x richer while middle class buying power has been decreasing since the early 80s.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
21400 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:06 pm to
All propped up by cheap borrowing. Embarrassing.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8861 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

It's mainly resulted in the very richest being 6x richer while middle class buying power has been decreasing since the early 80s.


And don't forget, productivity measures of American workers has skyrocketed right in line with these GDP numbers. The top 1% sure as shite aren't responsible for all that increased productivity.

A lot of people have said that we need to tax the frick out of these rich mofos and their companies unless they start treating their employees more fairly.

CEO pay in 1990 was typically 74x greater than an average employee's salary working for their company. Ridiculous.

But wait....in 2023, it reached 290x!

Yep....nothing to see here. Let's keep taxes low for the rich and make sure the poor don't pay anything! The middle and upper will take care of everything!
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
986 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Inflation is not that bad really in last 20 years. 1965 to 1985 it increased 242% 1985 to 2005 it increased 82% 2005 to 2025 it increased 64%


From 2005 to 2020 it wasn’t bad. From 2020-2025 it’s been terrible. At least for middle class and below. Upper class doing amazing thanks to taking advantage of free money and government handouts like PPP.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
8784 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

CEO pay in 1990 was typically 74x greater than an average employee's salary working for their company. Ridiculous.

But wait....in 2023, it reached 290x!



It's a problem with the whole model. Those CEOs are probably worth it to stockholders because they're enacting cost cutting methods like part time jobs without benefits, subcontracting cheap overseas labor to rid themselves of higher paying American jobs etc etc. . .

The whole model just penny pinches working to upper middle classes in ever more surgical ways into staggering increases for the richest investors.

This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 2:17 pm
Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
1236 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:15 pm to
Any idiot in a suit can rubber stamp the latest Kinsey analysis.

They're not worth a fraction of the actual labor they govern.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
8861 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

It's a problem with the whole model. Those CEOs are probably worth it to stockholders because they're enacting cost cutting methods like part time jobs without benefits, subcontracting cheap overseas labor to rid themselves of higher paying American jobs etc etc. . .

The whole model just penny pinches working to upper middle classes in ever more surgical ways into staggering increases for the richest investors.




'member way back in the day when companies didn't face existential threats if they had a bad quarter or two? When a CEO could actually lead a business through methodical, intentional growth over the long term, hiccups and all on the way there, and investors understood that as a means of achieving durable success?

Yeah, those were the days. Long gone, but those were the days.
Posted by Warfox
B.R. Native (now in MA)
Member since Apr 2017
3584 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Truth is there are so many factor that go into this, that no one here unless they have a PhD in economics and studied this stuff for a decade, can really tell you if it was better or not then vs now as there are multiple factors such as GDP per capita, average earnings and median earnings, home prices, interest rates, inflation, average and median debt per family. A lot goes into it.


Sorry but I will never accept the premise that only the erudite phd class has the ability to ascertain this.

The average American absolutely knows if it is better or not.



Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
47454 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Numbers in the air that have very little tangible impact on the average American’s daily life

The average American lives a much richer lifestyle today than 20 years ago. How did that happen if GDP had nothing to do with it?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
21328 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:03 pm to
Is this the thread where a bunch of broke dicks bitch about wealthy people?
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86925 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Yep....nothing to see here. Let's keep taxes low for the rich and make sure the poor don't pay anything! The middle and upper will take care of everything!
spot on unfortunately.
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7251 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

it doesn't appear that life has gotten much better for the middle class on down



There is plenty to complain about, but the comfort, housing and leisure of Americans has increased at every level of society. It is now simply taken for granted that you'll be watching streaming television, on a 60 inch third television in your home that is *only* 15% larger than your parents, with almost certain air conditioning and heat, with two cars in the garage with global positioning systems.

The amount of plenty that people assume is a natural state, rather than the hard won measure of progress is stunning.
Posted by Jimmy Bags
Member since Apr 2025
437 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:04 pm to
We don't have a revenue problem we have a spending problem yo
Posted by uptowntiger84
uptown
Member since Jul 2011
4418 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:11 pm to
I would think the elites are 3x richer if not more.
Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
1483 posts
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:13 pm to
It doesn’t actually measure production. A good chunk of that is government and agency jobs that are a net drain on production. Around 10% is financiers trading assets around without adding much value to the economy.
Posted by Hussss
Helena, AL
Member since Oct 2016
7484 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:56 am to
The U.S. Economy has been in a “silent depression” for 20 years.

This explains it all very well with charts and data to back it up.

Real wages haven’t increased since 1983.

It was as good as it gets for the entire population in the year 2000.

LINK
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
13431 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Kinda my point

These GDP gains have improved the lives of a very small % of the population


Technology and its availability have greatly increased in the past 20 years. As a small example, everyone has a smart phone, including kids.

Housing has gone up, and the price of cars has gone up. i'm willing to bet the combined value of household vehicles is way higher then it was 20 years ago.

just because me are dominated by the" must have the latest and best" mentality but are startled with debt doesn't mean we are not better. i can guarantee most households have way more "luxury" items then we did 20 years ago. now most luxury items are considered essential items.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
8784 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

i can guarantee most households have way more "luxury" items then we did 20 years ago. now most luxury items are considered essential items.


Cheap Asian products that diminished American manufacturing is precisely what flipped the script on "luxury" items, though.

In the 60s-80s, the new electronics were luxury items for working middle class folks but they owned a home.

I lived in Italy from 2000-2006 when European policies meant Chinese DVD players were just as expensive as German ones and Chinese shoes were more expensive than nice Italian ones. Luxury items in Europe, at that point at least, were still luxury items insofar as the retail price reflected the costs to make them with decently paid workers.


It's like we simply traded good jobs that brought real buying power to a majority of working Americans for cheap "luxury" Chinese TVs at Walmart.


This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 5:20 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130572 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 5:35 pm to
Gotten significantly better the last 4 months
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
41722 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

free market

someone hasn't been paying attention.

quote:

a free market is an economic system in which the prices of goods and services are determined by supply and demand expressed by sellers and buyers. Such markets, as modeled, operate without the intervention of government or any other external authority.

Idiots love to claim we have a free market, but fact of the matter is, we're far from having a free market. Especially with the current jackass in office.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram