- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
US crude oil output could boost, method promises to recover fuel from 90% left behind
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:26 am
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:26 am
quote:
A new method, developed in the United States, could help improve oil output from the tightly packed formations of shale rock. Developed by researchers at Pennsylvania State University, the new oil extraction workflow may improve shale oil recovery up to an additional 15%.
The efficient method could also provide long-term storage for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
Researchers revealed that the workflow was successfully implemented for the Texas Eagle Ford Shale, where it demonstrated improvement in oil extraction, the researchers said, explaining that it can be expanded for application in other shale reservoirs.
The method focuses on improving cyclic CO2 injection, a process in which CO2 is pumped into the reservoir to enhance oil production. Also known as “CO2 huff-n-puff,” the decades-old injection method bolsters extraction from naturally occurring rock formations.
Researchers revealed that these rocks contain microscopic pores, called nanopores, where significant portions of hydrocarbons – the main component of oil — accumulate.
Published in the journal Fuel, the study indicates that a larger volume of injected CO2 leads to greater enhanced oil recovery by enabling deeper penetration into the reservoir and more effective mixing with crude oil.
Furthermore, deep reservoirs containing low gas–oil ratio black oil are especially favorable for cyclic CO2 HnP, as the injected CO2 substantially enhances oil swelling and improves production potential, according to researchers.
quote:
“I would call this one of the best recycling systems in the industry,” said Hamid Emami-Meybodi associate professor of petroleum and natural gas engineering, faculty associate in Penn State’s EMS Energy Institute and lead author.
“Leveraging CO2 to bolster oil production eases environmental impacts, helps fulfill growing energy demand and contributes to the U.S.’ energy independence and security.”
quote:
The lead researchers revealed that during injection, CO2 is fed into the reservoir through a well. Then the well is shut to allow the injected gas to soak for a sufficient period. The gas mixes with the oil, altering its properties and improving oil mobility and extraction, according to the researchers.
By introducing CO2 in oil mixtures at different pressures, the injection process helps force hydrocarbons out of nanopores and to the surface. But the method’s effectiveness varies widely with changing operational conditions, depths and oil types, according to a press release.
quote:
Researchers revealed that the workflow was successfully implemented to optimize and screen cyclic CO2 injection in the Eagle Ford Shale. The workflow can be expanded for broader applications across various types of unconventional EOR projects, according to the study.
Oil produced from shale reservoirs drove record crude output in the U.S. over the past decade, but inefficiencies in extraction often leave as much as 90% of the oil behind.
LINK
My non-engineering mind self finds this kind of stuff fascinating, and very encouraging for continued domestic production. Whether using water or CO2, secondary and tertiary oil recovery has been around for about fifty or so years. However, it's the advances, which have accelerated over the past decade, that the industry is making technology wise that could help recover the remaining oil (cited at as much as 90%) out of those shale reservoirs, at a rate that is still economically feasible.
Very cool!
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:32 am to ragincajun03
We use that here in Louisiana already, nothing new.
What is new are horizontal drilling techniques to cover more area in a tight shale formations. In the Haynesville is a horseshoe shaped horizontal section which vertical to horizontal then a U turn in the horizontal. In the Permian is a J shaped horizontal section. and the J's straddle each other.
A cost savings of $10 million per well
What is new are horizontal drilling techniques to cover more area in a tight shale formations. In the Haynesville is a horseshoe shaped horizontal section which vertical to horizontal then a U turn in the horizontal. In the Permian is a J shaped horizontal section. and the J's straddle each other.
A cost savings of $10 million per well
This post was edited on 8/18/25 at 7:33 am
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:37 am to CitizenK
quote:
the J's straddle each other.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:37 am to ragincajun03
quote:
“CO2 huff-n-puff”
So, frack shotgunning?
Posted on 8/18/25 at 7:43 am to ragincajun03
CO2 Flood OUT
C2 Flood IN
It's ethane flooding szn
C2 Flood IN
It's ethane flooding szn
Posted on 8/18/25 at 8:01 am to CitizenK
quote:
We use that here in Louisiana already, nothing new.
Yeah...I'm kind of aware...
quote:
Whether using water or CO2, secondary and tertiary oil recovery has been around for about fifty or so years. However, it's the advances, which have accelerated over the past decade
Posted on 8/18/25 at 8:06 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
So, frack shotgunning?
Guess that could be one way to put it. I'll call it that next meeting on such a project and see what kind of looks I get from the engineers.
Apparently some secondary benches in the Permian produce a pretty good amount of CO2 that would have to be scrubbed before going down the true natural gas pipelines, so there's thoughts about almost immediately injecting that back into the same geographical area as the horizontal that drills that bench, but injecting it back into the primary bench reservoir that was already drilled and has been producing for several years.
Not even transporting it out.
A decade ago it might have just been vented out, but with all the emissions regulations and the hype around keeping excess CO2 from escaping into the atmosphere, different strategies are being tested.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 8:15 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Guess that could be one way to put it. I'll call it that next meeting on such a project and see what kind of looks I get from the engineers.
It's up to you to get this term to stick.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 8:41 am to ragincajun03
Denbury, Oxy, and Hilcorp have been CO2 injection for years. This doesn't seem like anything new
Posted on 8/18/25 at 8:50 am to ragincajun03
The CEO of Exxon when interviewed by Maria Bartiromo said the thought industry would continue to improve recovery rate in unconventional reservoirs for years to come. So it looks like Midland Texas is safe for years to come.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:02 am to LSUfanNkaty
Mostly conventional reservoirs.
The going back into unconventional shale stuff is what's been progressing over the past decade, which can hopefully help in get more juice with processes that may not be as capital intensive.
Still gotta figure out the increased water volumes, though, in Permian and Eagle Ford. Much higher ratios than DJ region. Though I wonder if the politics of the prime DJ regions are going to even allow for large scale huff and puff projects down the road.
The going back into unconventional shale stuff is what's been progressing over the past decade, which can hopefully help in get more juice with processes that may not be as capital intensive.
Still gotta figure out the increased water volumes, though, in Permian and Eagle Ford. Much higher ratios than DJ region. Though I wonder if the politics of the prime DJ regions are going to even allow for large scale huff and puff projects down the road.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:08 am to ragincajun03
Is injecting CO2 less controversial that water injection that the fracking opponents get upset about?
At least as my non-oil/gas mind thinks of it...
At least as my non-oil/gas mind thinks of it...
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:12 am to ragincajun03
quote:
My non-engineering mind self finds this kind of stuff fascinating, and very encouraging for continued domestic production. Whether using water or CO2, secondary and tertiary oil recovery has been around for about fifty or so years. However, it's the advances, which have accelerated over the past decade, that the industry is making technology wise that could help recover the remaining oil (cited at as much as 90%) out of those shale reservoirs, at a rate that is still economically feasible.
Very cool!
Yes.
So what I see happening here is dense phase CO2 being injected into these shale trapped oil deposits and mixing with the oil. I don't believe there is even a point of saturation when dense phase CO2 mixes with oil, like you have with salts and water and the salts precipitated out into crystals. I believe the dense phase CO2 mixed with oil just forms a less viscous fluid and the crude/dense phase CO2 mixture is easier to extract.
What is interesting to me is to understand the flow dynamics as the dense phase CO2/crude mixture rises to the well head. The pressure has to be kept above 1,060 psig in order to maintain dense phase CO2. If not they will run into all kinds of Joules-Thompson problems due phase change and potentially freeze the well.
Furthermore, once the dense phase CO2/crude mixture is brought to the surface the crude needs to be degassed of CO2. (Refineries don't want to purchase CO2). In that process the mixture will get VERY cold so the mixture needs to be degassed with a combination of heat input and flow rate to prevent freezing.
Another issue (and it's environmental) is as the crude is degassed the CO2 will just go back into the atmosphere.
FYI, I use the term dense phase CO2 because when CO2 is above 1060 psig it is either liquid or supercritical. Above this pressure and below 88 degrees F CO2 is liquid. Above 88 degrees it is supercritical. There are few YT videos that show the difference liquid and supercritical CO2. It's an interesting behavior.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:17 am to LSUfanNkaty
quote:
Denbury, Oxy, and Hilcorp have been CO2 injection for years. This doesn't seem like anything new
CO2 injection for sure, but new techniques are what this is about. I’m unfamiliar with them, but apparently they can help get 15% more oil out of the reservoirs.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:18 am to LSUfanNkaty
quote:
Denbury, Oxy, and Hilcorp have been CO2 injection for years. This doesn't seem like anything new
The only thing that I see as new is it's application to shale reservoirs.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:27 am to TigersnJeeps
quote:
Is injecting CO2 less controversial that water injection that the fracking opponents get upset about?
You’re still going to frack these shale reservoirs with a shite ton of water for the initial horizontal D&C phase. But then as you’re on the downswing of the production curve, at some point, CO2 will be injected into that same zone that was fracked with water say…six years ago and hope for an uptick in production.
This has somewhat been done, though usually with produces, marketable gas, in what’s called gas lift. However, those are typically just gas lines directly from the production facility linear back to the wellhead. And it’s a pretty steady injection stream/rate.
Typical secondary/EOR recovery with CO2, and with how I’ve seen some of these huff and puff projects proposed, can be more of a looped system that’s integrated. Doing that, though, can also involve more upfront land, legal and regulatory work to unitize the benches that were drilled off just lease based or drill spacing unit horizontals, but now you may want to develop a large, several thousand acre unit for the secondary recover operations.
Greta above should be very happy with these developing improvements, as it means we’ll put more CO2 back in the ground so she doesn’t have to grow up with dirty air and dirty water.
This post was edited on 8/18/25 at 9:29 am
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:38 am to GumboPot
That’s way too much nerd speak for me. I’ll have to get a coworker or my oldest to translate. 
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:46 am to ragincajun03
Thanks - so the CO2 injection is not really replacing the fracking with water but follows it to get even more gas/oil out.
Posted on 8/18/25 at 9:52 am to ragincajun03
Those Nittany Baws are doing good work.
Popular
Back to top

11









