- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Upper-class parents are raising their children better than lower/middle-class
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Parental involvement is still far more important than activity.
No one is disagreeing here. Parental involvement and the limiting of technology are not mutually exclusive. I'd argue that the limiting of technology actually promotes more parental involvement and interaction between parents and their children.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to lsupride87
Pecker still hasn't had his own kids yet, right?
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:09 am
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Bingo. From the very basic of being involved enough to provide and care for, to the much more advanced being involved of nurturing.
Parental involvement is still far more important than activity.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:12 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He's not. And he's right. Far too many variables to issue a blanket statement saying one is better than another
Your statement, at face value, is absolutely true.
But in the absence of any other information, I'd be willing to bet that a parent who has their kid taking piano lessons is generally a better parent than one who hands their kid an ipad for their extracurricular activity.
I'm honestly at a loss as to how this is even up for debate. It's like ya'll just read Battle Hymn of The Tiger Mother and think that a parent who has their kid in piano lessons must be a ruthless whip-cracking dictator.
It doesn't have to be piano. It can be sports. Dancing. Painting. Whatever. Any of these are generally much better for a child's cognitive, creative, and social development than playing on a ipad.
Which I believe is the point of the thread. Good parents should be encouraging and pushing their kids towards healthier activities and discouraging less healthy activities. Nothing about that concept has changed in the past 300 years.
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:17 am
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:12 am to Sun God
Again... Irrelevant to the topic at hand.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:13 am to UGATiger26
quote:
Rather, considering recent research on device and social media use, there are trends which suggest that excessive use stunts a child's cognitive development.
I've read some of those articles, and there actually hasn't been much that has linked the two past a general correlation. In other words, are the screens to blame or are they a symptom? However, I think moderation is important with anything.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:18 am to Displaced
Guessing you don't have kids either
OPs point boils down to "spend more time with your children". Well no shite. Of course that's a great thing. But once you fire out a couple little ones 95% of folks's best laid plans go to shite, for awhile at least.
Also the couple limiting their kids to 10 minutes per week on devices seems pretty harsh. Why let them have them at all
OPs point boils down to "spend more time with your children". Well no shite. Of course that's a great thing. But once you fire out a couple little ones 95% of folks's best laid plans go to shite, for awhile at least.
Also the couple limiting their kids to 10 minutes per week on devices seems pretty harsh. Why let them have them at all
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:20 am to Kracka
quote:
I love technology. I am a nerd and IT person. But I would love for my kids to not have anything to do with ipads. And it's our fault that they do. I don't mind them, but I wish my kids would have the same types of friends I had when I was a kid growing up. We always played outside damn near every day until dark, or until we had to do homework. We'd get together ride bikes, play football, basketball, baseball. We'd actually go knocking on their doors to see if they could come out to play. I hate this play date shite. I want my kids to be able to go beat on their friends door and tell them to come outside and ride bikes and shite. Maybe sneak off in the woods behind the house and look at some nudie mags. Fun stuff
Sounds like you need a different neighborhood. I have an 11 and 9 year old (along with a 5 and 4 year old). The older two are almost exclusively outside playing with friends in the neighborhood when there's daylight. And our door is constantly knocked on by other kids.
That doesn't mean they don't play video games, because they do. But they are expected to maintain good grades and behavior to have that priviledge. They are also active in multiple sports.
The one thing I will not allow at this point is social media. They absolutely will not have access to it until an age my wife and I deem appropriate (probably some time in HS).
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am to Pecker
quote:
I'd argue that the limiting of technology actually promotes more parental involvement and interaction between parents and their children.
This isn't necessarily true.
However using anything as a substitute for time with kids is bad.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am to Sun God
I do actually.
Please tell me how it's relevant though.
Please tell me how it's relevant though.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:25 am to Displaced
quote:It's not irrelevant.
Irrelevant to the topic at hand.
Who would you rather take a golf lesson from? A golfer, or some kid who is an expert at golf clash?
Who would you rather show you how to cook? A person who cooks regularly, or a person who watches the Food Network?
Who would you rather lecture you about parenting? A person who has experience raising kids on his own, or some kid who talks down to you based on an article he read and his ignorant ideals of what it takes to be a good parent?
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:26 am to Saskwatch
quote:
Damn shame lower income households don't have a piano in the living room. Too bad there isn't a big back yard for inner city kids to go build a fort. Shitty for single parent households to not hire a nanny to bring the little ones to tennis at the country club.
You buy a electronic piano perfectly suited for a piano student for $300.00, individual piano lessons for a kid cost less per month than their lower income parents are paying for cable TV. Tennis lessons can usually be had for free through recreation departments of most cities. The larger the city the easier it is to find activities for kids that don't involve staring at a screen. Its all about what the parents priorities are.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:27 am to slackster
quote:
Why can't you have a 5-10 year old who plays on an iPad for an hour or two each day?
That's a horrible parenting decision.
And, yes, I can judge parents on it. Now, it may not guarantee that their kid turns out to be this ADHD simpleton but willfully making that decision given the known data is poor parenting.
It's like arguing that its not bad parenting if I just give my kids 3-4 cigarettes a day so long as it isn't extreme.
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:34 am
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:27 am to Displaced
Hit submit too soon; I added some detail 
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:28 am to UGATiger26
quote:
Which I believe is the point of the thread. Good parents should be encouraging and pushing their kids towards healthier activities and discouraging less healthy activities. Nothing about that concept has changed in the past 300 years.
Well maybe I missed this point. The fact of the matter is kids have killed free time with less healthy (mental/physical health) activities for decades. If I see a kid playing with an ipad, I don't make a judgment on that person's parenting skills one way or the other. If I saw that person playing on an ipad for 5 hours, it would be a little different.
The bottom line is that it doesn't have to be an either/or situation. Plenty of good parents have kids who are involved in offline activities while still spending an hour or two in front of a screen each day. If my previous posts have insinuated otherwise, my apologies.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:29 am to RealityTiger
quote:
Who would you rather lecture you about parenting? A person who has experience raising kids on his own, or some kid who talks down to you based on an article he read and his ignorant ideals of what it takes to be a good parent?
It's not that though. He is commenting on stidies and findings vs what someone thinks about their parenting style which is subjective
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:30 am to Displaced
quote:
He is commenting on stidies and findings
Yet interjecting opinion and not considering numerous variables.
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
There are plenty of well rounded, well educated children that spent time learning multiple languages and the arts who will tell you their parents were shitty parents who just sent them off so they didnt have to deal with them
Those are called "exceptions to the rule."
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:31 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
And, yes, I can judge parents on it. Now, it may not guarantee that their kid turns out to be this ADHD simpleton but the willfully making that decision giving the known data is poor parenting.
An iPad is a better educational tool than anything we grew up with honestly
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:33 am to Antonio Moss
quote:Slightly, but I wouldnt call it a rare exception
Those are called "exceptions to the rule."
I think there are a ton of absent parents from rich households. Especially the fathers. But money helps to hide the negative consequences of this
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:34 am
Popular
Back to top


1




