Started By
Message

re: Upper-class parents are raising their children better than lower/middle-class

Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Parental involvement is still far more important than activity.



No one is disagreeing here. Parental involvement and the limiting of technology are not mutually exclusive. I'd argue that the limiting of technology actually promotes more parental involvement and interaction between parents and their children.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
52805 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:08 am to
Pecker still hasn't had his own kids yet, right?
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:09 am
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Parental involvement is still far more important than activity.
Bingo. From the very basic of being involved enough to provide and care for, to the much more advanced being involved of nurturing.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9128 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:12 am to
quote:


He's not. And he's right. Far too many variables to issue a blanket statement saying one is better than another


Your statement, at face value, is absolutely true.

But in the absence of any other information, I'd be willing to bet that a parent who has their kid taking piano lessons is generally a better parent than one who hands their kid an ipad for their extracurricular activity.

I'm honestly at a loss as to how this is even up for debate. It's like ya'll just read Battle Hymn of The Tiger Mother and think that a parent who has their kid in piano lessons must be a ruthless whip-cracking dictator.

It doesn't have to be piano. It can be sports. Dancing. Painting. Whatever. Any of these are generally much better for a child's cognitive, creative, and social development than playing on a ipad.

Which I believe is the point of the thread. Good parents should be encouraging and pushing their kids towards healthier activities and discouraging less healthy activities. Nothing about that concept has changed in the past 300 years.
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:17 am
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
33054 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:12 am to
Again... Irrelevant to the topic at hand.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Rather, considering recent research on device and social media use, there are trends which suggest that excessive use stunts a child's cognitive development.


I've read some of those articles, and there actually hasn't been much that has linked the two past a general correlation. In other words, are the screens to blame or are they a symptom? However, I think moderation is important with anything.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
52805 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:18 am to
Guessing you don't have kids either

OPs point boils down to "spend more time with your children". Well no shite. Of course that's a great thing. But once you fire out a couple little ones 95% of folks's best laid plans go to shite, for awhile at least.

Also the couple limiting their kids to 10 minutes per week on devices seems pretty harsh. Why let them have them at all
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am
Posted by RoscoeHarper
Edmond, OK
Member since Aug 2011
5023 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:20 am to
quote:

I love technology. I am a nerd and IT person. But I would love for my kids to not have anything to do with ipads. And it's our fault that they do. I don't mind them, but I wish my kids would have the same types of friends I had when I was a kid growing up. We always played outside damn near every day until dark, or until we had to do homework. We'd get together ride bikes, play football, basketball, baseball. We'd actually go knocking on their doors to see if they could come out to play. I hate this play date shite. I want my kids to be able to go beat on their friends door and tell them to come outside and ride bikes and shite. Maybe sneak off in the woods behind the house and look at some nudie mags. Fun stuff


Sounds like you need a different neighborhood. I have an 11 and 9 year old (along with a 5 and 4 year old). The older two are almost exclusively outside playing with friends in the neighborhood when there's daylight. And our door is constantly knocked on by other kids.

That doesn't mean they don't play video games, because they do. But they are expected to maintain good grades and behavior to have that priviledge. They are also active in multiple sports.

The one thing I will not allow at this point is social media. They absolutely will not have access to it until an age my wife and I deem appropriate (probably some time in HS).
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I'd argue that the limiting of technology actually promotes more parental involvement and interaction between parents and their children.


This isn't necessarily true.

However using anything as a substitute for time with kids is bad.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
33054 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:23 am to
I do actually.

Please tell me how it's relevant though.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Irrelevant to the topic at hand.
It's not irrelevant.

Who would you rather take a golf lesson from? A golfer, or some kid who is an expert at golf clash?

Who would you rather show you how to cook? A person who cooks regularly, or a person who watches the Food Network?

Who would you rather lecture you about parenting? A person who has experience raising kids on his own, or some kid who talks down to you based on an article he read and his ignorant ideals of what it takes to be a good parent?
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Damn shame lower income households don't have a piano in the living room. Too bad there isn't a big back yard for inner city kids to go build a fort. Shitty for single parent households to not hire a nanny to bring the little ones to tennis at the country club.


You buy a electronic piano perfectly suited for a piano student for $300.00, individual piano lessons for a kid cost less per month than their lower income parents are paying for cable TV. Tennis lessons can usually be had for free through recreation departments of most cities. The larger the city the easier it is to find activities for kids that don't involve staring at a screen. Its all about what the parents priorities are.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49577 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Why can't you have a 5-10 year old who plays on an iPad for an hour or two each day?


That's a horrible parenting decision.

And, yes, I can judge parents on it. Now, it may not guarantee that their kid turns out to be this ADHD simpleton but willfully making that decision given the known data is poor parenting.

It's like arguing that its not bad parenting if I just give my kids 3-4 cigarettes a day so long as it isn't extreme.

This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:34 am
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
52805 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:27 am to
Hit submit too soon; I added some detail
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Which I believe is the point of the thread. Good parents should be encouraging and pushing their kids towards healthier activities and discouraging less healthy activities. Nothing about that concept has changed in the past 300 years.


Well maybe I missed this point. The fact of the matter is kids have killed free time with less healthy (mental/physical health) activities for decades. If I see a kid playing with an ipad, I don't make a judgment on that person's parenting skills one way or the other. If I saw that person playing on an ipad for 5 hours, it would be a little different.

The bottom line is that it doesn't have to be an either/or situation. Plenty of good parents have kids who are involved in offline activities while still spending an hour or two in front of a screen each day. If my previous posts have insinuated otherwise, my apologies.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
33054 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Who would you rather lecture you about parenting? A person who has experience raising kids on his own, or some kid who talks down to you based on an article he read and his ignorant ideals of what it takes to be a good parent?


It's not that though. He is commenting on stidies and findings vs what someone thinks about their parenting style which is subjective
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:30 am to
quote:

He is commenting on stidies and findings


Yet interjecting opinion and not considering numerous variables.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49577 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

There are plenty of well rounded, well educated children that spent time learning multiple languages and the arts who will tell you their parents were shitty parents who just sent them off so they didnt have to deal with them


Those are called "exceptions to the rule."
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
52805 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

And, yes, I can judge parents on it. Now, it may not guarantee that their kid turns out to be this ADHD simpleton but the willfully making that decision giving the known data is poor parenting.

An iPad is a better educational tool than anything we grew up with honestly
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:32 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112530 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Those are called "exceptions to the rule."

Slightly, but I wouldnt call it a rare exception


I think there are a ton of absent parents from rich households. Especially the fathers. But money helps to hide the negative consequences of this
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 11:34 am
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram