- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
RoscoeHarper
| Favorite team: | Colorado State |
| Location: | Edmond, OK |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5053 |
| Registered on: | 8/30/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: "Producer Jesse"
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 10/1/26 at 1:12 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Its called the JP Poll cause that rhymes with AP Poll. Its supposed to be a joke
re: RIP to Mr. Belding: a principal to an entire generation
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/29/26 at 9:37 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
I'm 51 and was the targeted age demographic for that show and I never watched one episode
No you weren't, youre too old. Also, sorry to hear your are gay. Kelly Kapowski sent me thru puberty.
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/8/26 at 11:53 am to D500MAG
Explain yourself. I still haven't seen a good argument for your position other than "hurr durr u dum"
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 9:49 pm to Volvagia
My man I can't even follow you. Get off reddit for a minute and use your brain.
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 9:34 pm to Volvagia
Who said anything about more than a second??
So I think we can agree 0:00=0:00.
You seem to be arguing 0:01 means anything between 1.00 - 1.99.
It actually is anything between 0.01 - 1.00.
Its called an absolute clock if you'd like to Google that.
So I think we can agree 0:00=0:00.
You seem to be arguing 0:01 means anything between 1.00 - 1.99.
It actually is anything between 0.01 - 1.00.
Its called an absolute clock if you'd like to Google that.
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 4:36 pm to Volvagia
Yes it will. Tbh I'm questioning your education.
Do me a favor. Go put 10 seconds on your microwave and tell me if it instantly turns to 9 or it takes a second. Works exactly the same way as a game clock.
Do me a favor. Go put 10 seconds on your microwave and tell me if it instantly turns to 9 or it takes a second. Works exactly the same way as a game clock.
re: Which of these games was the most dominant natty beatdown?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 12:43 pm to Uga Alum
UGA-TCU was the biggest whoopin. But Bama-ND was just like a boa constrictor consistently choking the life out of another team from the starting whistle. The UF-tOSU game was just a pleasant surprise you couldnt look away from, also fun because of Ginn returning the opening kick for a TD then just getting dominated.
re: Did they ever find out who was the guy in the smoke that tried to take out Arch?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 12:36 pm to koreandawg
Looked like there was a camera man knelt down that he tripped over. Certain this meme will not be used later in the season though
re: Oklahoma going to Ann Arbor
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 12:31 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Serious Q, can anyone explain how the hell its only a 5.5-6.5 point spread? Everyone show ive heard today is making fun of it saying there should be a 1 in front of the 5 or 6.
I cant believe Vegas would take that risk. Nobody in their right mind will take Michigan
Vegas is about to make a mint on this game
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 9:37 am to D500MAG
quote:
Think about this
Where does the first second come from?
Again, in your scenario of it going from 15:00 to 14:59 instantly, that only counts out 899 seconds. There are 900 seconds in 15:00. Youre missing a second.
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 9:34 am to Dadren
You are exaclty correct. Somehow people are arguing against this.
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/7/26 at 7:35 am to Volvagia
quote:
Yes? When have you ever seen a fraction of a second displayed? Similarly, when they start the clock, you think it waits a second to turn every time?
That's the point, its not displayed but that doesn't mean it doesnt exist. And yes it does wait a second to turn. How else would it keep accurate time?
Think about this logically. A quarter is 15:00, if the clock immediately goes from 15:00 to 14:59 then in actuality the quarter is only 14:59. Where did the last second go?
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 10:55 pm to Volvagia
quote:
The instant you start the clock it is no longer 9 seconds. It’s 8.9. Which is shown by 8.
No it isn't. If that is the case how is 0.9 displayed? 0:00? No...
re: How is there variance in 9 seconds?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 4:33 pm to LongHornHandy
Problem was though it should have been a full 9 seconds, it wasnt. It clearly went from 9 to 8 almost instantly.
re: FIBA Women - USA vs Italy. (55-52 USA. Final)
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 3:04 pm to Buckeye Backer
Go Italy
re: NBC's clock probably wasn't synced with the game clock
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 1:48 pm to D500MAG
quote:
0.09 seconds on a game clock can be anywhere from 9.00 to 9.99 seconds
I'll reply to you too, you real sure about that? How much time is left when the clock shows 15:00?
When there are 0:09 seconds showing on the game clock it is 8.01-9 seconds, not 9-9.99.
re: Oregon and Michigan Not Impressive Oregon Rank #2
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 1:44 pm to TigerTiger12914
Oregon and Michigan were two completely different situations. Oregon didn't need a miracle clock operator and hail Mary. And on top of that Boise would be favored to beat WMU by about 14.
re: NBC's clock probably wasn't synced with the game clock
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/6/26 at 1:37 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
To be clear. 9 seconds would be displayed for anything between 9.0 and 9.9 seconds
You sure about that? How much time is left when the clock shows 15:00? By your logic it's 15:00.9 just so you are aware.
re: Will the 5 for 5 rule eventually work better?
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 9/4/26 at 8:53 pm to i am dan
Yes? That's kinda the entire point of it. No waivers
re: Big 8 + SWC superconference
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 8/30/26 at 9:10 pm to hookem33
No one is reading that
re: Big 8 + SWC superconference
Posted by RoscoeHarper on 8/30/26 at 2:20 am to hawgfaninc
Tried that once and texas fricked it all up
Popular
0












