- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: Idaho Murders Thread (Links inside)
Posted on 1/8/24 at 8:28 am to JasonDBlaha
Posted on 1/8/24 at 8:28 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
All his legal team has to do is raise the doubts, and the judge will let him walk.
That's it, huh? Raise a little doubt and the judge lets you off.
1
Posted on 1/8/24 at 8:38 am to Giantkiller
quote:
It was weird enough you bumped this thread for no real reason, but since then every take you've had is shittier and shittier.
Have you looked at this dude’s post history? Everything he posts is shitty. He’s either an internet troll or just a really ignorant human being. Maybe both.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 8:45 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
They let her walk because all of the evidence was purely circumstantial and there were no witnesses when it happened.
If I recall correctly, wasn’t this a prosecution issue? They tried her on the murder charges they couldn’t prove, but they probably could have gotten her for lesser charges had they gone that route. Or am I misremembering?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:08 am to jchamil
A legal team doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent, they simply have to raise the doubts. It’s common litigation sense 101
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:17 am to BeachDude022
All I’m doing is stating my opinion based on the evidence. You can disagree, but don’t fricking attack me just because I have a different opinion. That’s petty bullshite. And yeah, I like to have fun and talk smack to LSU fans because that’s the fricking purpose of this site; it’s supposed to let fans of opposing teams congregate and one-up each other when their teams win. That’s the beauty of this site.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 9:23 am
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:23 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
It’s common litigation sense 101
Is the judge determining guilt or innocence also Common Litigation Sense 101?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:44 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
JasonDBlaha
aTm fan
It's not what you identify as, it's what you are.
Take a lap and try some
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:12 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
None of that automatically means he killed them. And his legal team is contesting the reliability of the instrumentation that was used in obtaining his DNA.
You're reaching here reminds me of the line from Guilty Conscience when Eminem says "what she tripped, fell, landed on his dick?"
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:31 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
A legal team doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent, they simply have to raise the doubts. It’s common litigation sense 101
I see you've never served your civic duty. Raising some doubts about certain aspects is not enough to sway a jury from conviction. They have to raise a reasonable doubt that he was not the one that killed these kids.
Can the defense prove he has ever been inside that house other than to kill them? Can they prove how his knife sheath got there other than him murdering them? Can they explain why he got in his car around the same time as the murderer and turned off his phone, coincidentally having the specific type of car known to belong to the murderer?
I believe they could explain why he drove around that area days before and after, but that going along with the murder is going to tie him to it.
Raising "doubt" is not just giving some excuse why it couldn't have been him...you have to show that the doubt is real and why
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 11:39 am
Posted on 1/8/24 at 12:41 pm to Hangit
I can assure you that Texas A&M has hotter girls than LSU. That’s a fact.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 12:50 pm to Proximo
quote:this isn't allowed where they are, per a news clip I saw on this the other day.
That’s why jurors are taken on location at times
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:34 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Raising "doubt" is not just giving some excuse why it couldn't have been him...you have to show that the doubt is real and why
Hence the term REASONABLE doubt. People don't understand that. The Defense can't simply make up some other explanation for the crime with zero evidence and then force the Prosecution to refute that theory. And the jurors can't just say "it was aliens" and acquit. The doubt has to be Reasonable.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:41 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
You can disagree, but don’t fricking attack me just because I have a different opinion
Nobody’s attacking you because of your opinion, they’re attacking you because you’re an idiot
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:11 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:Nah. But they have bigger swords than Texas A&M men.
I can assure you that Texas A&M has hotter girls than LSU. That’s a fact.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:17 pm to L.A.
the wheels of justice continue to turn
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:21 pm to JasonDBlaha
IIRC, a knife sheath was left in the house with Kohberger’s DNA on it. I’m voting guilty if I’m on the jury based on that alone. Kohberger needs to fry.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:23 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
A legal team doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent, they simply have to raise the doubts. It’s common litigation sense 101
This isn't accurate. The prosecution has to carry it's burden of proof. The defense is under no obligation to say anything at all if they were so inclined. He didn't even offer a plea of not guilty as I recall so the judge entered it for him.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:10 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
A legal team doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent, they simply have to raise the doubts.
And unless the doubts raised are good ones, the prosecution will destroy them. What are you not getting?
Conviction doesn't require a witness or video proof.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:03 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
I can assure you that Texas A&M has hotter girls than LSU. That’s a fact.
We see them on TV at the games, standing next to those lil baws that are playing army men. They are a solid group of 3-4's.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 3:43 pm to Hangit
Page 179 of 179
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News