- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United's dragged passenger hires high-powered Chicago personal injury lawyer
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:23 pm to stendulkar
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:23 pm to stendulkar
I bet that poor guy is in ICU now.
0
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:23 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do you even read the terms and conditions when you purchase your tickets?
Have you? United's contract of carriage is actually not that well written for addressing when you are on the plane and the IDB happens. There is space to work for a lawyer.
This could come down if it is refusal to transport instead of denial of boarding.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:28 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
As is evidenced by the multitude of posts you have already made and are continuing to make to tell people they are wrong, when it isn't definite that they are.
Posting my opinions doesn't mean I care about yours.
quote:
A quick look at your post history shows 28 posts from you in this thread, and about 100 posts in yesterday's threads about this topic. But please, keep telling us how you don't really care about this topic.
Holy fricking creepy.
Also, I never said what you're trying to attribute to me.
quote:
You've made 130 posts in less than 2 days about the topic. Link yourself.
Still creepy.
quote:
It made sense financially to handle this situation in a multitude of other ways instead of the way they chose to. It made sense financially for the CEO to not place the blame on the passenger.
You really don't know the difference?
Interesting.
quote:
I'm perfectly happy with the questions I am asking and have asked.
Good for you.
I don't answer stupid questions with any amount of seriousness.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:28 pm to Dam Guide
quote:
United's contract of carriage
It's interesting that the "experts" here continue to pretend this is the only relevant document.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:29 pm to dukke v
quote:
Why should ANY passenger suffer because UNITED screwed up and could not get their people where they need to be???
Because it's not their plane. We don't have to like it.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:30 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Almost as bad as Bill Nelson.
The difference is that the bosses of United and the airport police now have to explain their employee's actions to Bill Nelson and the Senate subcommittee.
They don't have to tell Geraldo hello.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:31 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
I have noticed you wont answer me?? You ACT like you know everything about this subject... PROVE IT...
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:32 pm to Hangit
I said almost...
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:32 pm to dukke v
I did answer you, crazy.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Because it's not their plane. We don't have to like it.
OK...Would YOU have gotten PULLED off that plane?????
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:34 pm to dukke v
quote:
Would YOU have gotten PULLED off that plane?????
No.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:35 pm to dukke v
quote:
YOU are missing the point.... Why should ANY passenger suffer because UNITED screwed up and could not get their people where they need to be???
United had no choice. Neither did airport security.
You know nothing of DOT rules and regs. The crew could not get to their destination due to weather. So they had to get a jump ASAP, in order to have the time to go thru pre-flight for their next leg
United had no choice. Either bump these 4, cancel an entire flight that would have no crew and possibly pay outrageous penalties for the crew not meeting certain regs
They probably didn't think the crew was going to make it, once they began boarding. When they showed up at the gate. Denial time
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:38 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Posting my opinions doesn't mean I care about yours.
Then exactly what are you posting your opinions in response to?
quote:
Also, I never said what you're trying to attribute to me.
Do you know you're lying when you do this? Or do you actually believe the things you're typing?
quote:
Still creepy.
Apparently we can creepy to that list of words you don't know the meaning of.
quote:
You really don't know the difference? Interesting.
Nope. So please, attempt to spell it out for me.
quote:
Good for you. I don't answer stupid questions with any amount of seriousness.
It's quite obvious from your posts on this thread that you don't answer any question with any amount of seriousness.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:41 pm to barry
quote:As a couple of posters already replied, we know section 25 is regarding oversold tickets, which this was not the case.
United contract of carriage; section 25
So again, I have yet to see any one show me anywhere where he can be bumped at the discretion of United.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:45 pm to League Champs
quote:
You know nothing of DOT rules and regs. The crew could not get to their destination due to weather. So they had to get a jump ASAP, in order to have the time to go thru pre-flight for their next leg
SO United screwed up and A passanger who paid for their flight had to suffer????
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:47 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Then exactly what are you posting your opinions in response to?
You understand the two can be separated, right?
quote:
Do you know you're lying when you do this?
Link it.
quote:
Apparently we can creepy to that list of words you don't know the meaning of.
Are you saying your obsession is not creepy?
quote:
Nope. So please, attempt to spell it out for me.
Pass. I just find it interesting.
quote:
It's quite obvious from your posts on this thread that you don't answer any question with any amount of seriousness.
That isn't true. It only appears that way because there are so many stupid questions.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:47 pm to dukke v
quote:
YOU are missing the point.... Why should ANY passenger suffer because UNITED screwed up and could not get their people where they need to be???
You missing the point. Due to overbooking, which is something airlines can do legally, when a flight doesn't have enough cancellations and there are more people on the flight that seats, they have a system in place to determine who they will take off the flight.
Unless I am missing something, the only thing that United screwed up was the was they removed the guy from the plane.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:51 pm to OweO
quote:
Unless I am missing something
Well you are.... FRom what I have seen, United mesed up because A CREW HAD to be on that plane.. So they chose to remove pAYING customers to take another flight so that THEIR crew could get to Louisville...............
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:51 pm to shel311
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Still waiting on that link with the multiple attorneys siding with United.
Can you provide links of the multiple lawyers siding with United? I peeked around today, didn't find much.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:52 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Can you quote the part of the contract that puts UA in the clear?
I'm still correct
Thanks in advance.
Page 27 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News